Non-Atlanta news broadcast tonight:
“Investigators are trying to determine a motive here. Six of the victims were Asian and seven were women, authorities say the 21 year old told them he had a sex addiction and was trying to eliminate temptation though there is no evidence the women targeted here were sex workers. Investigators have not ruled out race as a motive.”
Wink, wink, it’s really all about race, no matter what anyone says...
I've always wondered about the obsession with trying to find the motivation behind a crazy person's actions. Is it not enough to say that this person had a mental breakdown and his crazy brain found some sort of crazy reasoning for what he did? Somehow, it's always got to be a societal problem. The fact that 99.9999% of the population do NOT do these things should tell them it isn't society's fault.
I mean, crazy people gonna crazy. That's what they do.
I'd be willing to wager that if prostitution wasn't his motive, than he would have found something else. I don't think it starts with the "justification" for these guys. I think they're messed up and will glom onto whatever happens to be rattling around in their brains at the time. In other words, they have a short-circuit in their wiring and they'll find something in the outside world to fixate upon. There's really no sense for sane people to try to remove all "justifications" that could arise in the minds of crazies - you'll never be able to cleanse the world of all possible triggers.Here is something else to consider from a societal point of view. Assuming the killer is telling the truth about his motives, and I have no reason to think otherwise, what led him to such a state of self loathing over frequenting prostitutes? Is it the fact that prostitution is illegal? The movie "The Silence Of The Lambs" was propaganda about the idea that society blocking someone with gender dysphoria getting a sex change might lead that person to become a serial killer. But...in this case...it seems that the facts support the idea that the prohibition of the world's oldest profession led to mass murder. Someone explain to me why I'm wrong here.
But...in this case...it seems that the facts support the idea that the prohibition of the world's oldest profession led to mass murder. Someone explain to me why I'm wrong here.
My take on his reasoning seems to lead me to the opposing idea: that the readily available amount of "cheap" sex and porn facilitated these addictions that he internally loathed.
Think A.J. Maggot from the film "The Dirty Dozen"
I'd be willing to wager that if prostitution wasn't his motive, than he would have found something else. I don't think it starts with the "justification" for these guys. I think they're messed up and will glom onto whatever happens to be rattling around in their brains at the time. In other words, they have a short-circuit in their wiring and they'll find something in the outside world to fixate upon. There's really no sense for sane people to try to remove all "justifications" that could arise in the minds of crazies - you'll never be able to cleanse the world of all possible triggers.
I recognize this is the constrained view of the world, but I think it's valid in the case of mass murderers.
So all mass murderers are the guy that shot up the Nashville Waffle House and will never stand trial for his crimes because he is crazy? Maybe. But I don't think so.
I've always wondered about the obsession with trying to find the motivation behind a crazy person's actions. Is it not enough to say that this person had a mental breakdown and his crazy brain found some sort of crazy reasoning for what he did? Somehow, it's always got to be a societal problem. The fact that 99.9999% of the population do NOT do these things should tell them it isn't society's fault.
I mean, crazy people gonna crazy. That's what they do.
... But...in this case...it seems that the facts support the idea that the prohibition of the world's oldest profession led to mass murder. Someone explain to me why I'm wrong here.
My take on his reasoning seems to lead me to the opposing idea: that the readily available amount of "cheap" sex and porn facilitated these addictions that he internally loathed.
...
Nobody has said this yet, so I'll say it. Is there a reason why most of these "massage parlors" that are undercover bordellos are Asian? This is a stereotype that seems rooted in reality. It's just like I expect a nail salon to be Asian. And yes, the overwhelming majority of prostitutes/escorts are NOT Asian. I did a simple search on Google for "massage parlor bust." There were the top three videos.
...
If I hear that a meth lab exploded I'm expecting to see a white person. If I hear a crack house got busted I'm expecting to see a black person. If I hear a school shooting, I'm expecting a white male. If I hear there was a drive by shooting, I'm expecting to see a black male. If I hear a massage parlor got raided for prostitution.....I'm expecting to see Asian women. Color me crazy.
So....crazy guy has a hard on for massage parlor prostitutes? He wants to take out his main temptation? And it's a shocker that most of his victims are Asian women? That's what nobody is saying. But I said it. If he just hated Asians over the "kung flu" you'd think he would find a way to kill some Asian men.
I’m with AF on this. Obviously these services were out in the open and highly available.
The contradictions and failures in the law are a separate issue.
Stereotypes and gross generalizations exist for a reason. They usually reflect real world observation.
I had the same thought while watching an Asian woman on TV telling us how the fact that mostly Asian women were shot proves that the shooting was racially motivated. If someone wanted to go out and murder prostitutes, they would have to go to fixed locations like these massage parlors, which happen to all be Asian. There are plenty of other prostitutes, but a street walker would probably be much harder to find than these parlors.
Highly available is not the same as available without risk. If you have not been involved with the legal side of prostitution, either as a defense lawyer or a defendant, there is a piece of the puzzle you're missing. The men who get arrested are forced to go to "John school" to get out of having to spend time in jail where they are told over and over again how horrible they are for paying for sex. The perp in this case was identified as a "sex addict" and his roomate said he attended supporting meetings. Think 12 step "alchoholics anonymous" type groups. Step 1? "Admitting powerlessness over the addiction." So, dude gets drilled in his head over and over again that not only is he horrible for having gone to prostitutes, but also that he can't help his behavior. He is supposed to be paranoid about himself, only the reaction to his self induced paranoia isn't supposed to be "go and destroy your temptation" but "go call up your support group to get one of them to talk you out of what it is you really really want to do." I agree with [MENTION=30558]CaptUSA[/MENTION] that he's got a wire loose up there somewhere. I agree with [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] that the hypersexualization of society in general probably was a problem for this guy. But I happen to think that the criminalization and demonization of his easiest outlet for his urges probably didn't help matters either.
And at the end of the day, no matter how you cut it, there is more "sex" available everywhere you turn, but it is cheap, tawdry and hard.
Sex, and every perversion of it, are on open display everywhere, readily available...
And yet we're all having less of it, and what we do have, is less and less satisfactory and fulfilling.