I'm still not doing very well with the nurturing, am I?
You're not making many debate points, either.
I'm still not doing very well with the nurturing, am I?
Sounds like money laundering to me under those circumstances.
There definitely is/will be a "paper trail" as to which money transfers move from/to which bank accounts and when.
And wouldn't it have been nice to have received an e-mail explaining the intended allocation of those excess funds, as well as a link to the newly released FEC reports vs. finding out in a newspaper article?
I believe the original article is quoting the published FEC reports.
Do those FEC reports represent reliable information as to how monies "are actually used" as legally reported by HQ?
You should probably start by making some damned sense before you bother with nurturing.
I'm not nurturing, nor am I a teacher. If you have a reading comprehension problem, ask your teacher to help you.
He can transfer it from EITHER campaign to the CFL anytime he wants to.
They will have to detail what they do with the money, though they are free to do virtually anything they want with it.
The point is, all we know now is that it was moved from one campaign war chest (presidential) to another (congressional). That doesn't necessarily tell us a thing about how it will ultimately be spent.
Keeping a campaign going is a paperwork nightmare and costs money. Given that the Presidential campaign is over, they probably just want to "close the books" on it. Before they could close the books, they had to do something with the money. Its entirely possible that he just temporarily "parked" the money in the congressional campaign fund (which stays open as long as he's in congress) because he had to get it out of the Presidential campaign in order to shut that campaign down.
In other words, just because it was moved to the congressional campaign does NOT mean its going to be spent running for congress- he can still shift it to the CFL next week or next month if he chooses to do so. Or he can spend it on booze and strippers. Or he can spend it on booze and strippers for the CFL rally (best of both worlds).
Sigh. Please include a link to anything that supports what you keep posting.
But there are definitely laws that specify how it *cannot* be spent/transferred.
And it's "entirely possible" that 100% of your guesses are wrong!
Wouldn't it really be nice, for once, if RP told us what he is doing based on the constraints imposed by various legal requirements?
I also think many people would vehemently disagree with you that the campaign has been *SHUT DOWN* vs. suspended.
Sigh. Just more babble.
Hmm. Somehow, I recall hearing that paying strippers tends to impact political careers. Doing so would certainly impact supporter perceptions of RP's personal integrity!
How many strippers will $3.5M strip?
Hell, for my share of the overage, I could have rented my own stripper!
How many strippers will $3.5M strip?
ALL of 'em!
There may not be enough strippers in Minnesota. I can bring a couple from Texas (if Ron will pay for them in advance).
Notice that today's email from the CFL says "Paid for by Committee to Re-elect Ron Paul". That is the congressional campaign. So I guess until the CFL is officially announced in Minn all CFL stuff falls under his congressional campaign and that's why the money was transferred there. Makes sense to me.