400,000 march for "climate change" in NYC

Some say a comet will fall from the sky.
Followed by meteor showers and tidal waves.
Followed by fault lines that cannot sit still.
Followed by millions of dumbfounded dip shits.

Some say the end is near.
Some say we'll see Armageddon soon.
I certainly hope we will cause
I sure could use a vacation from this

Stupid shit, silly shit, stupid shit...

 
DeCaprio to push Climate change globally, via his private jet.

Socialists... the useful idiots of the Marxists.


LDiCaprioPrivate110208_01_X.jpg


oh... and via private yachts

Photos-clockwise-from-top-left-Getty-Images-AFP-Getty-Images-YouTube-screenshot-Wmagazinevevo-Getty-Images.jpg
 
DeCaprio to push Climate change globally, via his private jet.

Socialists... the useful idiots of the Marxists.

He also gets to smoke and not be harassed about it. It must be nice to a privileged puppet.
 
nucular plants have almost no carbon emissions.

The uranium needed to operate it is conjured from thin air, not mined by large machines that run on fossil fuels?

And they say we libertarians want to return to the stone age. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
DeCaprio to push Climate change globally, via his private jet.

Socialists... the useful idiots of the Marxists.


LDiCaprioPrivate110208_01_X.jpg


oh... and via private yachts

Photos-clockwise-from-top-left-Getty-Images-AFP-Getty-Images-YouTube-screenshot-Wmagazinevevo-Getty-Images.jpg

Not to mention his multiple Hollywood mansions,his luxury NYC apartment or his private Caribbean Island.
http://www.bornrich.com/leonardo-dicaprio.html

I bet that yacht burns more fuel in 24 hours than I have burned in my V-8 4 wheel drive pickup truck in the last ten years,and which one does Leonardo want to outlaw?

Yep,the super rich liberals supported by the useful idiots.
 
That reporter wasn't even challenging Kennedy that much, but he still got bent out of shape. Kennedy not only grabs her microphone, but his little friend in the background starts wagging his finger at the reporter. lol

She should have asked him this:

“Don’t stronger environmental laws mean higher costs?”

“And don’t higher costs mean more pollution?”
 

maybe it's the fact we have better energy saving refrigerators, while smartphones and computers are relatively new.

the paper actually attributes it to the use of wireless networks, which would be no better if your device was a tablet or computer. Smartphones are just one of many devices which use the same wireless technology. Is wireless communication less energy consuming than using copper wires? are smartphones more efficient than computers 10 years ago?
 
She should have asked him this:

“Don’t stronger environmental laws mean higher costs?”

“And don’t higher costs mean more pollution?”

How about we start off on the right foot and stop conflating climate with pollution? CO2 is not a pollutant or poison. Causing climate change is not polluting.
 
I bet that yacht burns more fuel in 24 hours than I have burned in my V-8 4 wheel drive pickup truck in the last ten years,and which one does Leonardo want to outlaw?

How many people have yachts?

And what would it matter how much fuel is burned if you don't accept that carbon emissions influence climate?
 
I wonder about how many of those 400,000 marchers legally pay zero in income tax each year and/or are on welfare and feeding at the taxpayer trough?
 
Back
Top