3 states sending 700 National Guard troops to DC

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,559
via AntiWar.com

Nicholas Slayton
Aug 16, 2025


At least 700 National Guardsmen will be sent to Washington, D.C., nearly doubling the number of troops already activated in the capitol.


Hundreds of National Guardsmen from three states are being activated to go to Washington, D.C. to aid the military mission in the nation’s capital.

West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced the activation on Saturday, posting on X that the state is deploying “300-400 skilled personnel to the nation’s capital” at the request of the Trump administration; Joint Task Force – District of Columbia specified it is 350 Guardsmen. In a press release that followed, the governor’s office added that the state’s involvement will include “providing mission-essential equipment” and “specialized training.” The deployment is being funded “at the federal level,” the announcement said. South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster posted on X that he authorized the deployment of 200 National Guardsmen, but noted they could be recalled in the event of a disaster such as a hurricane. Meanwhile Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said that the Ohio National Guard is sending approximately 150 military police officers at the request of the Secretary of the Army, which will arrive in the coming days. They will conduct “presence patrols and serve as added security,” DeWine said.

That brings the total number of troops activated for the D.C. mission to more than 1,500. The West Virginia National Guardsmen were the first group of troops announced to join the District of Columbia National Guard since it was activated on Monday. The deployment comes five days after President Donald Trump said he was activating the National Guard to join hundreds of federal law enforcement personnel that were sent to Washington, D.C. 826 District of Columbia National Guardsmen are set up inside the city, with 200 patrolling the streets at any time, according to the military. They have conducted patrols near the National Mall and Union Station.

Trump said he was sending in the large law enforcement and military presence to address crime and homelessness in the nation’s capital. Data from local agencies and the Department of Justice show that crime has significantly dropped in Washington, D.C. However, since last weekend, hundreds of federal agents, including personnel from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Drug Enforcement Administration have arrived in the city, patrolling D.C. streets around the clock. Authorities have also been clearing homeless encampments in the city.


Continue:

 
[In the back of my mind thought]:

It's great that Trump is clearing the homeless out[?]. I wonder what will happen to them. Will they end up in my neck of the woods? Migrate up to @Anti Federalist 's in New Hampshire? Maybe @TheTexan 's down in Texas? Perhaps they will go where it's warm and head over to @Swordsmyth 's over in Cali. I mean, they have to end up somewhere.

What a game of Musical Chairs. All for political expediency.

Remember folks, any time every time government [the state] gets involved... it ain't gonna save you. Federalized, or not. It will cost money, though.



Trump said this week that homeless people will be moved far from the city in his crackdown on crime. But details of the plan to do so are unclear.​
Washington’s status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump the opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda. It’s prompted concern from advocates and others who say there are better ways to address homelessness than clearing encampments and leaving their occupants worrying about where they go.​
 
Last edited:
[In the back of my mind thought]:

It's great that Trump is clearing the homeless out[?]. I wonder what will happen to them. Will they end up in my neck of the woods? Migrate up to @Anti Federalist 's in New Hampshire? Maybe @TheTexan 's down in Texas? Perhaps they will go where it's warm and head over to @Swordsmyth 's over in Cali. I mean, they have to end up somewhere.

What a game of Musical Chairs. All for political expediency.

Remember folks, any time every time government [the state] gets involved... it ain't gonna save you. Federalized, or not. It will cost money, though.

Most of the homeless are homeless by choice. Making that choice inconvenient can actually reduce homelessness
 
Clearly the reason this is happening is because Trump is going to need more manpower to arrest our pedophile politicians.
 
3 *MORE* GOP Governors Authorize Deployment of National Guard Troops as Part of Trump Show of Force

by MATT BROWN and MIKE PESOLI
August 18, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — Three more Republican governors authorized the deployment of National Guard troops to Washington on Monday, part of President Donald Trump’s escalating show of force that he says is designed to crack down on crime and boost immigration enforcement in the nation’s capital. The announcements by Mississippi, Tennessee and Louisiana brought the number of state troops detailed to the president’s effort to more than 1,100 — and the number of states to SIX.


Continue:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1,100. In one town. That's a lot. Can you even imagine walking around, minding your business, only to be surrounded by 1,100 armed uniforms?

Even after "Patriot" Act, TSA, Covid... that Manufactured Consent Whitney Webb repeatedly warned about really did work :mouthopen: [again]
 
Hopefully they're patrolling a wider area than just me.

Selfishly thinking, because I truly do believe people should get exactly-what-they-deserve - I hope every-single-person who supports this ends up getting caught up in the system - even if "inadvertently".

Fucking Statists.
 
Selfishly thinking, because I truly do believe people get exactly-what-they-deserve - I hope every-single-person who supports this ends up getting caught up in the system - even if inadvertently.

Fucking Statists.
Pssst.... You're caught in it too, PAF.
 
Pssst.... You're caught in it too, PAF.

I never supported this. I knew well before and repeatedly warned about it. And I certainly did not "vote" Trump, the first, second or third time.

It's on them. Fuck them.
 
I never supported this. I knew well before and repeatedly warned about it. And I certainly did not "vote" Trump, the first, second or third time.

It's on them. Fuck them.
A sense of humor helps.
 
Oh, I see. You're one of them.

[End discussion]
By them, do you mean someone who believes individuals who violate property Rights should be held accountable for their behavior? Someone who is tired of progs making excuses for criminals? Then yes, I am one of them.
 
Back
Top