If the media is bothering to cover it and paint it like it doesn't matter, I'd say that's a good indication that they realize that it's far from over, but want to paint the narrative as if it is. Why would they even bother if it didn't matter?Much of it is "he's winning things but that doesn't matter…" I wish the media really knew what they were talking about.
There is so much misinformation out there - from both our ranks and the media's - that I don't know what to think.
To original poster:What is your source?
Which candidate was talked about most this week?
Candidate......Twitter mention.........news mention
Barack Obama.... 217,871...12,676
Mitt Romney .......165,949.....5,393
Ron Paul .............79,340 ...... 758
I have/had a thread following these things...Last month Ron Paul had Ron Paul 62,204....773
[SIZE=-1]ron paul[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]mitt romney[/SIZE]![]()
![]()
Yea I get that but from what source are you taking your data?Just google or ?This is today only, look at the number of articles when you search his name. Also pay attention to last 30 days on Google trends, in particular last 24 hours.
Yea I get that but from what source are you taking your data?Just google or ?