12-year-old running Trump campaign office in Colorado

There are 12 year olds that are getting their Ph.Ds. I'll bet the kid does a fine job, and probably has read and understands the U.S. Constitution.

Yep- a lotta kids I work with are just like that.

We had a "Constitutional Convention" at a local University. The college students couldn't even tell you what the Amendments were. Our kids sank 'em. ;)
 
Trump better fits the definition of national socialist than Hillary.

Hillary's more like a bolshevik.

Same thing in practice, but the one is clothed in class-based rhetoric ans the other in nationalist rhetoric.

clinton has a bigger body count...= Hitler.

any body counts on Trump?...
 
clinton has a bigger body count...= Hitler.

any body counts on Trump?...

Actually, Stalin had a much higher body count (assuming we're not counting war deaths), though that's well beside the point of my analogy.

In any event, the murders attributed to Hillary over the years are small potatoes compared to the policy issues at stake.

And on those issues (wars, increasingly socialistic economic policy, increasing loss of civil liberties, etc), Trump = Hillary, Hillary = Trump.
 
I want a new site guideline that simply says ban CPUd.

Or you could create your own site where you can all talk about your favorite tyrants and how they will run your life for you. But I guess that would take more brain power than most trump supporters have. Sorry to interrupt. You can go back to sounding stupid again.
 
Actually, Stalin had a much higher body count (assuming we're not counting war deaths), though that's well beside the point of my analogy.

In any event, the murders attributed to Hillary over the years are small potatoes compared to the policy issues at stake.

And on those issues (wars, increasingly socialistic economic policy, increasing loss of civil liberties, etc), Trump = Hillary, Hillary = Trump.

Yep.

And in death and loss of liberty, Stalin made Hitler look like an amateur.

I'd say:

Hillary Stalin
Donald the Trumpet Hitler
 
the comparison of hitler and trump is a childish comment, as hillary has a true body count. Trump does not. Why is that?....
 
the comparison of hitler and trump is a childish comment, as hillary has a true body count. Trump does not. Why is that?....

I was speaking in terms of national socialist (Hitler) compared to global socialist (Stalin)- not body counts, per se.
 
Actually, Stalin had a much higher body count (assuming we're not counting war deaths), though that's well beside the point of my analogy.

In any event, the murders attributed to Hillary over the years are small potatoes compared to the policy issues at stake.

And on those issues (wars, increasingly socialistic economic policy, increasing loss of civil liberties, etc), Trump = Hillary, Hillary = Trump.

I really thought you were just a little misguided until I read this........... As in your core philosophy was generally acceptable to me, but I still don't know how you're arriving at this far fetched conclusion.

Hillary has a, extensive, documented political record of what she has tangibly done, while Trump is a neophyte with no known record. Unless, you own a time machine of some type, this is awfully subjective.
 
Last edited:
False

He has a long record of expressing his support for terrible, radically unlibertarian policies and politicians.

That record is described in great detail in the Trump Opposition Research Thread.

He has served in a public capacity like Hillary? That's where the rubber meets the road so to speak. Buying politicians for business favors doesn't nearly carry the same weight as actively participating in the governmental structure.
 
Last edited:
He has served in a public capacity like Hillary?

No, why would that matter?

Person A has expressed support for policy X; therefore, we can infer that if elected President this person will pursue policy x.

That applies to everyone, regardless of whether the person held office previously.

Buying politicians for business favors doesn't nearly carry the same weight as actively participating in the governmental structure.

Forget the donations to the likes of Hillary, how about his many public statements in support of specific policies?

Was doing TV interviews to praise the bailouts and stimulus, or posting a youtube video praising he invasion of Libya "just business" too somehow?

...despite whatever tortured logic you'll deploy in your next post to say "yes," the answer is very clearly "no."

He held/holds those views, and we should therefore infer that he would govern in accordance with them: i.e. terribly.
 
lol...and yet you support a liberal....

oh well...nobody's perfect...:D

If you mean liberal in its original sense, yes indeed:


  • end the fed, return to gold standard
  • balance the budget through spending cuts
  • replace all existing taxes with single FairTax
  • abolish Dept. of Education
  • opposes all business subsidies
  • opposed TARP
  • opposed auto company bailouts
  • opposes Keynesian stimulus spending
  • opposed Obamacare
  • opposed the Medicare Part D expansion under Bush
  • favors cutting social security, medicare, and medicaid
  • opposes labor unions
  • wants to eliminate the minimum wage
  • opposes immigration restrictions/deportation
  • favors tree trade, opposes tariffs
  • opposes governmental regulation of internet
  • opposes PATRIOT Act and NSA spying
  • opposed Iraq and Libya Wars
  • opposes involvement in Syria Civil War
  • opposes involvement in Ukraine Civil War
  • favors immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan
  • favors cuts in defense spending
  • supports 2nd Amendment
  • opposes War on Drugs
  • favors legalization of assisted suicide
 
No one is supporting Hillary that I know of.

i suspect you're a closet supporter of clinton...proof is in your million or so posts beating up on your candidates opponent...

if it quacks like a duck...that sort of thing, but carry on, you're amusing me.
 
Back
Top