(11/22) Republican Debate On Natl Security - Heritage Foundation & AEI - OFFICIAL Thread

He's not talking like a Dove at all. He's sticking to the declaration of war point, that Israel can do what it wants with Iran (he mentioned his support for them to take out Iraq's reactor in the 80s), and that we just flat out can't afford aid and undeclared wars.

He's obviously been listening to the grassroots.

That's good to hear. You can be a non-interventionist and not paint yourself into a corner as a vulnerable pacifist. Maintaining that balance is crucial.
 
129159146086577935.jpg
 
Give Ron a rebuttal NOW. Wolf Blitzer and CNN, Ron is a front runner, he is being called out, he must have a chance to respond. They don't want him responding because the MSM darlings will look foolish. See the ultimate Romney flustering on the budget of all things. Mittens strong point.
 
since they ran out of legitimate talking points, and want to rehash the same debate to not give real contenders(like paul) a legitimate chance to appropriately speak his mind in these debates.
 
If Ron were actually getting a chance to rebut these morons and maniacs, he'd be winning this debate even more handily than he already is.
 
Back
Top