(11/22) Republican Debate On Natl Security - Heritage Foundation & AEI - OFFICIAL Thread

What happened? My livestream cut out right after Ron made his last statment.

He said to Paul that we WERE attacked (9/11) but it's funny how neither Iran nor Iraq nor Syria nor Lybia attacked us.... he just ties it all in to play into the fears of the ignorant masses who can't distinguish one of these countries from the others.
 
If Ron was a better speaker and 40 years younger, he'd be leading this pack. But he's getting better with his presentation as we creep towards the primaries.

That's what matters. He needs to peak at the right time, unlike the rest of them that have their moments in the sun then fade back after they open their mouths. Ron is handling this just fine.
 
He's not going to win over the hardcore neocons. This debate is being conducted by failures of the Bush administration and other necons. But the AUDIENCE includes a lot of more reasonable people, including at least some who do not profit from the military industrial complex. Many of them will understand. Hell, even the necons understand- they understand too well.

I'm sorry, but no. RP could simply have talking points, and stop with his truths. For crying out loud, do we RP people never talk with people that watch Fox News and the other networks daily? RP is shown as insane/crazy on national defense...WEAK, and his answers don't help that! GET HIM SOME DANG TALKING POINTS! I have been screaming this since the last go around, RP needs a speech coach, and they need to sit down with him for a week straight to help him with talking points. Talking points that keep his message, but sound tough on defense. This whole, "What would we do if China..." yea, wonderful great. AINT working, we must win the REPUBLICAN nomination to continue...........
 
Back
Top