10%

+rep

Thanks for everything you're doing, Catdd. We'll never be truly free until more people show the courage it takes to be true revolutionaries by anonymously insulting others on the internet.

@OP
The movement needs a large number of people, not divisive, useless postings.
 
Have you read his recommended reading lists at the back of his books?

If you had, you'd be an-cap.

Why does Ron Paul want you to be an-cap?

There you go, imposing on him non-existent qualities out of thin air. You can't really tell me that Ron Paul wants me to be an-cap if he hasn't said so himself. You can't judge what someone wants just cuz they tell you to read a book. There are many more things you can get from that book than "an-cap society is obviously the best solution to everything."

Don't be naive. I know you're not that stupid. And no, I would not necessarily be an-cap if I read those books.
 
And no, I would not necessarily be an-cap if I read those books.
Oh yes, you most definitely would be. You only think there's any hope you wouldn't be because you haven't actually read the books. If you

a) value truth, and
b) value liberty,

and I presume you value both because you are a Ron Paul supporter, then you will be totally crushed under the inescapable deluge of truth and reason that will assault you from the pages of these books that Ron Paul recommends you read. You will not be able to escape from the relentless logic. There will be no way out and no excuses left to you.

So are you brave enough to put me to the test and prove me wrong? Do you have the courage to read what Ron Paul has challenged you to read?
 
I get so tired of the people who refuse to recognize that we're all fighting for the same things.

I wish this was true. When it becomes true, then we will achieve what we want.

There are people on this board and in media that will fight to the death to keep the truth from being told. CoIntelPro is alive and well. Hegelian dialect is alive and well as well. It is not always easy to determine who is fighting the truth because they don't understand it, or if they are fighting the truth to keep their privileged position. Rev9 could spot them on this board in an instant. They did everything they could to disrupt this board during the election. Rev9 hasn't been posting since his last ban. He may be getting tired of getting banned. Yet he is a true freedom fighter.
 
So what exactly is wrong with taking the NAP, self ownership, and private property rights to their logical conclusion (anarcho-capitalism)? I will say that a government that would strictly follow the Constitution would be much better than what we have of course. I just won't defend the constitution because I'm not going to defend the existence of any state.
 
So what exactly is wrong with taking the NAP, self ownership, and private property rights to their logical conclusion (anarcho-capitalism)? I will say that a government that would strictly follow the Constitution would be much better than what we have of course. I just won't defend the constitution because I'm not going to defend the existence of any state.

The state is not based on the non-aggression principle. Laws are. Hume, Locke, Mises, and Paul are all pro-State guys. Ron Paul's message has always been obey the Constitution. He has been saying that over and over consistently for 40 years or more. I think he knows what he is talking about.
 
Do you remember the speech at the We are the Future Rally about the Freedom Train metaphor? I think it is relevant
 
Back
Top