romeshomey
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Messages
- 301
I don't get it. I have been trying to think of why Ron Paul said there was about a 0% chance of a brokered convention with Romney out of the race.
Why does he think that? He doesn't think there can be a 3 way split between McCain, Huckabee, and himself?
I find it odd that as Ron Paul says there is a 0% chance since Romney dropped out, the MSM has been reporting that now that Romney is gone, it's looking more like a brokered convention.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this becuase I thought the WHOLE strategy from day one was to win a brokered convention. I thought that is why he was aiming for the caucus' and not focusing on the primary states.
What am I missing, and why does the MSM report that it looks like there is going to be a brokered convention since Romney dropped out and Ron saying it now looks like 0%.
Anyone?
Why does he think that? He doesn't think there can be a 3 way split between McCain, Huckabee, and himself?
I find it odd that as Ron Paul says there is a 0% chance since Romney dropped out, the MSM has been reporting that now that Romney is gone, it's looking more like a brokered convention.
I'm not quite sure what to make of this becuase I thought the WHOLE strategy from day one was to win a brokered convention. I thought that is why he was aiming for the caucus' and not focusing on the primary states.
What am I missing, and why does the MSM report that it looks like there is going to be a brokered convention since Romney dropped out and Ron saying it now looks like 0%.
Anyone?