Recent content by randfan7

It is clearly a photoshop; he didn't cross his fingers like that. Do you know anybody that can cross their fingers like that? Index over middle wrapped that far across even? Go give it a try and come back here.

I don’t want to criticize either of these two whistleblowers but the way in which they both accessed and disclosed the information is important to compare and contrast. I think how they proceeded is critical in understanding why one would get more support than the other. I think Snowden took...

Pretty good timing for Rand considering in his CNN editorial yesterday before the news of this broke: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/29/opinion/rand-paul-syria/index.html McCain just proved Rand's point.

I'd like to see if the timing of the arming of these terrorists coincides with McCain's visit to Libya. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42715776/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/

The powerbrokers and their shihtzus in the media know very well that his father and his supporters are both the strong foundation of his base but at the same time a a potentional destructive weak link. They are going to hit that foundation repeatedly and do their best to infest it with cracks...

I was just asking a question about what rights the owner of the supposed evidence has and if they can restrict it release. There is no need to be an asshole. If I had that evidence and I couldn't restrict its release then it seems like a good reason to shop it around before giving it to the feds.

So the feds can distribute copyrighted material? Isn't that what they would be doing by releasing the video? I understand if it goes into the public record at trial; but before hand I can't see how they have that right without permission from the copyrightholder.

I'm no expert on copyrights or evidenciary procedure; but would the person who took the claimed video be the copyright holder? Would such a person have the right to stipulate that the feds not release the video to the public until it was part of a trial? If I was the person that took the...

If pomposity is a requirement for the job; then there really is no substitute for a qualified brit.

You must remember that Bush's campaign manager and director of political affairs in the white house was a gay man. And who would doubt that Rove (and Bush) knew that all along? These people only use religious folk as tools for their empowerment.

Lets not forget his wish to eradicate the 2nd amendment:

The photo I remember; they looked like old lady jeans he was wearing. In regards to Rand, I think they just misspelled genes.

As long as you hire a doctor to kill somebody it should be legal cuz its "privacy" and all.

I don't know why anybody is surprised by this. Rand has said many times that his first politically related speech he made was on the subject of pro-life, it is clearly important to him. If you don't want a kid, don't have sex; it really is as simple as that. Even with our retarded...

It wasn't the OP that I replied to. I quoted the person I was responding to.