Recent content by newtoforums

Which one is more likely to run and win some electoral votes? I think Johnson sticks to his principles more but might not be electable as Sanford.

Yes you do. You do realize men and women have different work habits. Men are more likely to stick to one job, work weekends, work overtime . A woman working full time works less hours than a man who works full time. Men on average work 10-20 hrs more per week. If you want to get paid...

Why should men do what you feel like they should do? Maybe men are tired of being nothing more than beasts of burdens. Why are you only attacking lazy, corrupt, and irresponsible men? Do traditional gender roles allow women to be this? Should men ignore any bad things women do out of...

True. Why should homosexuals pay into a system which they can't take out of? If we eliminate finacial benefits then there is no reason for this to be an issue. I also believe in eliminating alimony something the Republicans will never go for with all their man hating chivalry.

roxic27 that sounds like a joke. If you're so independent why do you need to have your feelings protected? Why do you need chivalry? Why do you need to be defended as you put it. its one thing to want those things. But don't say you're independent. Sounds like only a passive aggressive...

There already is. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,94415,00.html

That's like all women.:D

Female politicians with daughters and sons have constantly "volunteered" their sons for a draft. Everybody has an equal right to not be killed. Doesn't the constitution guarantee equal protection? Not everybody believes in wimpy chivalry.

1. Men get raped and sexually assaulted in POW camps too. 2. Aren't women often the leaders of the POW camps? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

There is probably no need or attraction in being a gentleman. But yes many women do want thugs. And these guys are usually treated ridiculously nicely by women. And from what i have heard women treat these guys amazingly too. they are affectionate, loving, want sex, cook, pay for these men...

So what you are saying is if women lead they benefit? But when men lead, women are still the ones benefiting and being taken care of? Being dominant is a burden but if the privileges and rights that come with it don't outweigh the burden its pretty stupid to take it. Now if when you mean men...

This is not gentlemanly behavior. Most could be applied to women too. This is just civil behavior that every male and female should act. Btw men can't be fathers because they have to support women. I am sure most men would switch places and trade in their tiring office jobs to spend more time...

You are thinking about a woman's definition of a sensitive man. A TRULY sensitive man would show his emotions but he would almost NEVER sit on the sidelines and comfort a woman. He would find that to be painful and move on to a woman who will be there for him and think about him and ONLY him...

Chivalry seems anti biblical. Doesn't the bible say women were created for men and not vice versa? Wasn't the original chivalry a code of how to act in war? It seems we are talking about courtly love. www.antimisandry.com has numerous threads explaining this.

What a disgusting attitude. Feminism does believe in harming men and protecting women. Hence why male vicitms of DV are ignored. YOU are a feminist.