You can operate under whatever president, congress, or authoritative figure you'd like - just don't force me to accept your personal decisions on the issue. In return, I won't force you to accept my personal decisions either.
^^ Except this should be for 2016. No more playing the politics game after Ron Paul. There's so much we could do in the next four years to free so many people, and none of it involves electing representatives. If only we could stop pretending like those guys in suits have legitimate authority to...
speaking off the record: It's kind of insane how many people think the "proper role of government is to protect the rights of the individual," and yet the fact that for the institution to exist, it must then necessarily have a moral right to tax you without your consent doesn't seem to pose any...
Right, and I appreciate a lot of what Alex Jones does. But with regard to the protesting, can you give me an example of a possible outcome that would convince you your actions have been ineffective?
What I mean is this, in the free market, a company has limited resources, and if the company...
The argument isn't over too much liberty...in my opinion, there can be no such thing. The question has always been, how do we achieve liberty, and the question I would pose with regard to protesting elite globalists is: "is what you are doing having any affect whatsoever on liberty. What...
Lol, well that sounds easy, what am I missing? Do I just go lobby Washington to pass a law for no government? Is that what you've been doing posthaste to get Ron Paul in office?
Burning down a church doesn't make all the parishioners atheists. Society-wide ideological changes take time, and at...
The actual protesting is likely doing nothing...sure they're getting some coverage from Russia Today News, but let's be serious, these are the most powerful people in the world. Nobody can touch them...they are the boss of the boss of your boss's boss...they own everything, and more importantly...