Recent content by lew

Not only the Old Right, but even the most prominent influences of the New Right were anti-militarist. http://anarcho-monarchism.com/2012/01/19/antiwar-conservatism/ 'Conservatism' today is a sad movement with influence from Trotskyist neoconservatism, Religious Right Christian-statist...

When are you people going to learn that online polls mean NOTHING?

You guys are misconstruing what he said in this particular instance. He was stating that big government and disorder go hand in hand. He was criticizing big government here.

Right. Because those polls didn't get much attention. Now that all you people are voting in this one, it will get attention. If you really wanted to 'prove' to them that we don't spam polls, you'd either a.) leave the poll alone or b.) vote 'yes' in the poll. If 'No' starts increasing...

Uh no. Spamming means that idiots repost a poll all over the Internet to get people to vote in the poll, far beyond the typical vote response and readership of the original source. Thus, why it is so incredulously stupid for us to post these meaningless polls all over the place. If you...

Who cares? It's an online poll. Leave the polls alone. If you are a regular reader of Ingraham's site, by all means, vote. If not, don't.

Cool. Expect to lose the election with this tripe.

oh shut up. If you think Paul can weather a charge of racism, with the EVIDENCE BEING A NEWSLETTER WITH HIS OWN NAME ACROSS THE BANNER, simply by stating what he said in 2008, you're a moron. As Paul rises in the polls, he will be hit hard with this. And he needs to provide an answer that the...

You guys aren't being consistent here. Don't act like that if there was some Newsletter that went out for 20 years under Romney's or Newt's name, that we wouldn't be clamoring to make commercials about it. The fact is that these Newsletters exist. They've always been the bane in Ron Paul's...

La Follette > Roosevelt

Why is it when people say they attacked us because we are free, people don't say that is 'blaming America'? Why is it only when someone says our policy contributed towards it? To say that they attacked us because of our liberties IS TO BLAME AMERICA, at least as much as it is to say foreign...

Check out this article about Santorum: http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/york-why-santorum-runs The questions here are all answers Paul would answer in the affirmative. We're on the cusp of something wonderful here.

Excellent interview. But Paul fumbled with some of his answers, unfortunately. He repeated the same thing here. He didn't say two opposing viewpoints, which is what he meant to do. He misspoke a few other times too. Still, an excellent interview.

For people that support individualism, many of you are even worse at mob think than socialists. "I support individualism, but I'll get pissed at anyone that thinks differently than I do on any given issue."

I tried to coordinate a money bomb on this date a few months back, but no one really responded. http://thisseptember29th.com/