Recent content by bobburn

The paranoia and leaps in logic in this article/thread is astounding.

He titled it this way to show that inaccurate titles don't help anything.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::toady:

It's not just "copying the design" it's a deliberate fraud (a fake) meant to confuse people on which slate to vote for.

If we could get him to first, that would be amazing..but it seems unlikely at this point.

It was pretty obvious in the end. The reporter clearly labeled what everyone was doing was pandering or being pandered to. The person missing was Ron Paul who doesn't pander and will never do so. The beginning was pretty good too--they distinctly allowed the fact that he "received the most...

If you want to be a delegate, you should probably fill out all the forms so they can't challenge you.

Ben just needs to sit down for about 5 minutes with a statistician to know that there is no actual evidence of vote flipping.

None of them have one a single election. Primaries, yes, but not a presidential election.

The idea that one's reputation isn't property is absolute tripe. There would be no chose of action (think claim) if this was true. If one harms, or damages your reputation, they harm something that belongs to you. That is why you can get damages for it--they've damaged your property...

If Paul isn't the GOP nominee, Obama will win. I have no doubt of that.

That's not exactly how that works. There's a presidential preference poll, which are the totals reported, and then there are votes for each individual delegate--the 31 he got. They don't affect one another.

Ron got 3 of the top 9 of what seem like delegates. Romney got 4 and uncommitted got 2.

http://vigop.com/ Says that Ron won the popular vote, but only got one delegate while Romney got 6.

and 600 of them will vote :-/.