Mitt Romney Multi-billion dollar ponzi scheme involving Romney and Son

Tiso0770

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
519
Wow!, I don't know if this has been posted yet but it's the first for me and it does need to be repeated as a reminder of why one should vote for paul.

So, Romney thinks he could get away with his and his sons crimes by becoming president, i say "no chance".

As reported here and here several weeks ago, we reported that Romney would certainly be disqualified or discredited as a Presidential candidate for the 2012 election due to fraud and other crimes against the American Taxpayer and the US Government.

As far back as 2009, nearly concurrent with the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scandal, the GOP knew, beyond any doubt, that Mitt Romney was seriously involved with a Ponzi scheme, to the tune of $8.5 BILLION dollars.

In February of 2009, the Washington Post revealed that the SEC was alleging $8 Billion in savings fraud by Allen Stanford AND HIS COLLEAGUES, read Mitt Romney and Son, of lying about investments and CDs in a Ponzi scheme concerning staggering amounts of investor’s money, partnerships in which they invested upon collapse of the fraud.

“”We are alleging a fraud of shocking magnitude that has spread its tentacles throughout the world,” Rose Romero, director of the SEC’s Fort Worth office, said in a statement.”

Despite the actions of the SEC in this case,

“A few months after the Ponzi scheme collapsed, a firm financed by Mitt Romney and run by his son and chief fundraiser partnered with the three men and created a new “wealth management business” as a subsidiary.”

So what do we know?

We know that Stanford has a PAC which has contributed large amounts of money to lawmakers annually.

We know that over $400,000 of that money was tied directly into the Madoff Ponzi scandal.

We know that one is only sentenced if FOUND GUILTY:

“Sentencing has been set for June 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8A before Judge Hittner. Stanford faces a maximum prison sentence of 20 years for the count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, each count of wire and mail fraud, and the count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and five years for the count of conspiracy to obstruct an SEC investigation and the count of obstruction of an SEC investigation.”

Victims of this Ponzi scheme have been asked to fill out ‘Victim Impact Statement/Financial Crime’ and have not, as yet, received compensation or restoration of fraudulently stolen funds.

We know that Romney lied about the specifics of the Stanford Fraud and still created a joint ‘wealth management system’ with criminals

“Mitt Romney, his son Tagg, and Romney’s chief fundraiser, Spencer Zwick, have extensive financial and political ties to three men who allegedly participated in an $8.5 billion Ponzi scheme. A few months after the Ponzi scheme collapsed, a firm financed by Mitt Romney and run by his son and chief fundraiser partnered with the three men and created a new “wealth management business” as a subsidiary.”

Whereas the ‘screwing’ those ‘poor guys took’ actually was court ordered forfeiture:

“According to the indictment, which also seeks forfeiture from all the defendants (18 U.S.C. §§981(a)(1)(c) and 982(a)(1)), Stanford and his co-defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors who purchased approximately $7 billion in certificates of deposit administered by Stanford International Bank Ltd. (SIBL), an offshore bank controlled by Stanford and located on the island of Antigua. Stanford and his co-defendants allegedly misused and misappropriated most of those investor assets, including diverting more than $1.6 billion into undisclosed personal loans to Stanford himself, while misrepresenting to investors SIBL’s financial condition, its investment strategy and the extent of its regulatory oversight by Antiguan authorities.

“Also according to the indictment, Stanford, Pendergest-Holt and King conspired to conceal the fraud from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to fend off an SEC investigation. King allegedly provided Stanford and others with confidential information that he had received from an official SEC inquiry into a possible fraud on investors by SIBL so that additional false representations concerning SIBL’s financial health and Antiguan regulatory oversight could be made. In addition, Stanford, Pendergest-Holt and others allegedly agreed that Pendergest-Holt would provide false information to the SEC about the true value of SIBL’s investment portfolio. See copy of Indictment below.”

We know that the charges are many and serious:


Background: On June 19, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas unsealed a 21-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury on June 18, 2009, against defendants Robert Allen Stanford, Laura Pendergest-Holt, Gilberto Lopez, Mark Kuhrt, and Leroy King, charging each with one count of conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud (Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371); seven counts of wire fraud (Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1343); ten counts of mail fraud (Counts 9-18: 18 U.S.C.§ 1341), and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering (Count 21: 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) stemming from a $7 billion investment fraud scheme. The indictment also charges Stanford, Pendergest-Holt and King with one count of conspiracy to obstruct a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation (Count 19: 18 U.S.C. §371) and one count of obstruction of an SEC investigation (Count 20: 18 U.S.C.§1505).


We know that Romney has no intention of protecting citizens and investors from further Ponzi schemes:

“The revelation about Romney’s ties to the Stanford ponzi scheme unmask the risks associated with removing new investor protections. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform law, a reform Romney says he will repeal if he wins the presidency, attempts to address future Ponzi schemes by enacting new protections for whistleblowers to alert authorities when they find evidence of fraud. The law also creates a new Investor Advocate and Investor Advisory Committee within the Securities and Exchange Commission to detect and investigate future Ponzi schemes.”

As early as 2009, with the scandal of a major PAC being involved with leading Republican Mitt Romney, an honest vetting by the GOP would certainly have disqualified him from GOP support for the Presidential elections. However, if the GOP, who in 2008 adopted the identical platform as the Democratic Party reworded, WANTED to throw the election to Barack Obama, they could hardly do more to guarantee it for 2012.


As Crooks and Liars states:

So to review, we have Mitt Romney coughing up $10 million to help start a firm that hired three brokers who sold bogus CDs for Stanford Financial and made some decent money on the deal, too. Not only that, but Spencer Zwick the lead fundraiser for Romney’s campaign is a principal in the Solamere Capital firm along with these Stanford brokers. Spencer Zwick does business as SJZ, LLC, and has been paid over $2 million in fees by the Romney campaign.

Since sentencing of the first convict begins in June of 2012, it is guaranteed to blow up as a major campaign issue leading into August, September and November of this year, and will affect the GOP campaigns.

The criminal fraud not only of Madoff and Stanford, but of the major banks and Wall Street firms has so overwhelmed the economy of this country that voters will be hard pressed to give the office to one so deeply connected to these evils.

hxxp://libertarianreview.us/2012/05/04/gop-threw-2012-election-to-obama-in-2009-multi-billion-dollar-ponzi-scheme-involving-romney-and-son/
 
Everyone thought that trial of Tony R someone in Chicago, the one who bought the house next to Obama contemporaneously with Obama's purchase and let Obama use (and mow) his yard as an extension of Obama's own, would 'bring down Obama' but media seemed completely uninterested.

I don't know that the article you quote proves all the points it alleges with the evidence it cites (I don't see a direct lie in there, for example), but I agree this is definite smoke.
 
One way we could tell is this...

Sentencing has been set for June 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8A before Judge Hittner

Someone could check with the clerks desk to see if such a case is to be presented.

Edited: hmmmm, some more info....

JUDGE DAVID HITTNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Courtroom No. 8A, 8th Floor
States Courthouse 5l5 Rusk Avenue, Room
Houston, Texas 77002
(7l3) 250-57ll
Ellen Alexander, Case Manager
United States District Clerk
Post Office Box 61010
Houston, Texas 77208
(7l3) 250-5511
 
Last edited:
There are plenty of honorable businessmen. Romney isn't one of them. The line of work he is in is just plain dirty. You have to be a snake to nest with snakes.

What we need is an honorable man to clean-up the corruption in Washington. All we would get from a Romney presidency would be a venomous pit of serpents.
 
Something like this should hurt Romney badly. Will it? Probably not. Should it? Most certainly yes. Here's hoping.
 
There are plenty of honorable businessmen. Romney isn't one of them. The line of work he is in is just plain dirty. You have to be a snake to nest with snakes.

What we need is an honorable man to clean-up the corruption in Washington. All we would get from a Romney presidency would be a venomous pit of serpents.

i agree...while his businesses may be completely legal, they find loopholes, and are very dirty. So when asked about this or any other questionable act, they will always respond with we follow the law type of answers. But this isn't just him, its corporatism, and its so big, its nearly impossible to stop.
 
about that, it depends if Goldman Sachs thinks Obama has done enough for them and is going to do more of it, then media wont give a damn about it and thus that story will die a slow death. the literary agent will be discredited, called paranoid, sent to an institution, all his past will be dug up for his fallcies, etc etc
on the other hand, if GS thinks Romney would do more for them and they decide to throw Obama under the bus, things would be quite different.
I think the first option is more likely.

What will the news of obama's birthplace "actually" being in Kenya (according to his literary agent from a 1991 book) do?
 
But it doesn't matter because Romney is electable :rolleyes:

no one gives a damn about what scandals that romney is involved in, unless there is a dead hooker in romney's closet. people dont care cause he has the "Republican" tag next to his name and that he is supposedly the one to beat Obama.

imo, i think Obama is purposefully making himself look bad and Romney look good (with the birther issue and pro-gay). Romney flipflops to being anti-gay. I think most of us heard that romney has a 9point lead over obama in gallup polls.
 
What will the news of obama's birthplace "actually" being in Kenya (according to his literary agent from a 1991 book) do?

Probably nothing because most people don't even know it is against the Constitution for him not to be a natural born citizen and many of those that do know think the Constitution is wrong and should be changed.

The Romney vs. Obama show will look real for public consumption, but don't be fooled, it is all a prearranged show with a prearranged winner and both Romney and Obama are in on it. Paul had to be censured because he wasn't a part of the show, but was staging a genuine run for the presidency of the USA. One where votes count and speaking to crowds was a way to educate and encourage them, rather than like the other candidates where it meant just a few reporters gathered around to record the latest sound bites for the "news" shows. Paul was not a part of the show, he was a unwelcome party crasher and they just wanted him to go away. They have smeared him, made fun of him, and called his supporters nuts, but he still gets the biggest crowds and he still has more knowledge about the Constitution and foreign affairs than the rest of them have with an army of advisors at their sides. Ron Paul knew what he was up against and ran anyway. Why? Because he gives a damn about America and Americans, that's the only reason.
 
This is the party so many of you want to be a part of and try to salvage.

Nothing will change as long as the two party criminal system stays in place. That is something you can bank on.
 
Men like Romney become the types of men that everyone loves, those who abuse you with a smile on their face. Women love them so men love them and many more men want to be like them. By being deceptive and abusive he'll get many more votes than by being sincere and promoting liberty.
 
I stopped reading here because the article lost its objectiveness:

In February of 2009, the Washington Post revealed that the SEC was alleging $8 Billion in savings fraud by Allen Stanford AND HIS COLLEAGUES, read Mitt Romney and Son...

That conclusion is not a logically sound extension of the initial statement.
 
If this information ever sees the light of day, it will probably be ONLY because of the Obama campaign. Since they are in bed with the same serpents though, seems unlikely. This is information I would love to pass on, but I can't really try to circulate it when it's from such a biased (towards us) publication.

I wish people would continue to follow up with the procedings however ... anything having to do with Romney would most likely be delayed until after the election and then squashed, or a deal made or somthing.
 
Back
Top