Kind of weird to think that if instead of doing this he had looked at a picture or video of someone else doing what he did he would be facing at least a minimum sentence of 10 years (likely much more).
No, I'm not saying that looking at porn like that is "okay" , it's definitely not in a moral sense -- but still it's bizarre that there are draconian sentences for that yet those who actually commit direct physical abuse against children often just get a slap on the wrist.
No, I'm not saying that looking at porn like that is "okay" , it's definitely not in a moral sense -- but still it's bizarre that there are draconian sentences for that yet those who actually commit direct physical abuse against children often just get a slap on the wrist.