Zbigniew Brzezinski on Hardball defending Ron Paul's position on Iran (video)

No offense but I think all this talk about "globalists" and "one world government" needs to stop. They're basically abstractions. An actual, definable and visible problem are the neocon zionists. They're the guys who get us to go around the middle east and fight wars for Israel. Brizenski isn't one of them. The chances of us getting into a war with Iran, Syria, etc because of them are much higher than us being led to war with China and Russia by globalists. At the very least Brizenski is honest. His foreign policy isn't based on his own ethnic interests.
The "neocon zionists" leaders are NWO/CFO shills. They're all PUPPETS of the FED.
 
The "neocon zionists" leaders are NWO/CFO shills. They're all PUPPETS of the FED.

This kinda` Alex Jones style retarded talk is hurting Ron Paul. Reinforces the view most of his supporters are paranoid, shotgun bible, redneck morons with tinfoil hats on their head.

World is not as black or white as some would have you believe.
 
Last edited:
As others have said, Zbigniew is big on promoting a world government or at least a lone superpower to police the world (for peace and stability). He is more strategic than the traditional neo-con hawks. He would advocate a more peaceful approach to solving problems if possible.

As far as endorsing Paul, not a chance.


The guy seriously needs to buy a vowel.

lmao
 
This kinda` Alex Jones style retarded talk is hurting Ron Paul. Reinforces the view most of his supporters are paranoid, shotgun bible, redneck morons with tinfoil hats on their head.

World is not as black or white as some would have you believe.

Actually...you're wrong.

But whatever. I assume you don't LIVE in a red state?
 
People need to stop seeing the world in the 2 party paradigm.

If they understand the problems with the FED...and then connect that the bankers own BOTH Obama AND Romney it wakes a LOT of people out of the slumber. So I respectfully disagree.
 
You have your corporate whore media at the baseline, then the politicians in our government, then people higher up like Kristol, then the executive branch and above that is where you start hitting the top of the pyramid with the likes Zbig and Rockefeller, and the influential elites here, and in the UK/other countries. I wouldn't consider Zbig a 'neocon' lol, he is way above that order. In fact, neocons or neocon 'zionists' are nothing more than lapdogs for the wealthy and powerful illuminists, most of which rarely make public appearances.
 
As others have said, Zbigniew is big on promoting a world government or at least a lone superpower to police the world (for peace and stability). He is more strategic than the traditional neo-con hawks. He would advocate a more peaceful approach to solving problems if possible.

As far as endorsing Paul, not a chance.




lmao

On by far the biggest foreign policy issue of today, only one person in office or running for president has the same opinion as him. I don't think an endorsement is that far-fetched.
 
On by far the biggest foreign policy issue of today, only one person in office or running for president has the same opinion as him. I don't think an endorsement is that far-fetched.

An endorsement is that far-fetched.

Dick Cheney thinks there should be a New World Order, and we should get there right now if we have to turn the economies of the major economic powers to rubble in the process. Brzezinski thinks we could take a little time about it, and do it more carefully. Ron Paul doesn't want a New World Order. He believes in states' rights specifically because he believes competing governments help ensure our liberties. You can't have totalitarianism where you can move across the border and have liberty.

So, if you're holding your breath waiting for Brzezinski to endorse Paul, don't worry. You'll pass out before you die, and start breathing again. Might give yourself a headache, though...
 
There was a thread about him here recently and I was surprised at how negatively he was viewed here. There's a huge difference between him and neocons like Bill Kristol. Anyone hated by AIPAC and called an "anti-semite" can't possibly be that bad. Check out what he has to say. Maybe there is a chance we can get him to endorse Ron Paul.

Uhm, no...Luke talks to him bout some things...
 
I think a lot of these "NWO" order people (I don't really believe there is some over-reaching conspiracy, there's probably elites into that sort of poorly-defined thing, but there are factions with differing aims. I think a lot of the rich globalists really are interested in peace, trade, secular governments, cynical of democracy, western values and western dominance, etc... it's just that they think in terms of NOW instead of the long term. Brezinski here seems to think in terms of the long-road, though it was interesting he didn't mention the Green Revolution and how the Iranian citizens don't like the current regime. Reading on wiki he was against overthrowing the Shah of Iran so he seems to be of a smarter breed.

I think the biggest problem is that some of these factions want to be play king, and that doesn't work in a post-monarchic civilization.
 
Last edited:
On by far the biggest foreign policy issue of today, only one person in office or running for president has the same opinion as him. I don't think an endorsement is that far-fetched.

Ron Paul wants out of the UN, NATO and other entangling alliances.

Zbigniew Brzezinski wants exactly the opposite. He's a member of the CFR.

You're delusional if you think Zbigniew would even think of endorsing Ron Paul.
 
I hope Iran gets a bomb!

They have the right to protect their sovereign nation.

America, UK, EU and other UN nations are being bullies jockeying for position to take over their oil.

It makes me sick and disgusted that we allow our country to police and bully other countries.

Are we really gonna allow ourselves to become a nation of all out aggression and invasion.

The Fed Gov spouts Fear thru the mouths of the Media to scare the general US population into submission to allow us to become a Dictator to other nations.
This does Not make america great nor does it make me proud to be American!!
 
Richard Engel: Even if Iran were to get a nuclear weapon, what would they do with it? Would it fire it on to Israel. Iran would cease to exist a short while later.

7:00 minutes in. It sounds like Chris Matthews was trying very hard not to laugh after that line from Richard Engel.



Richard Engel: Even if Iran were to get a nuclear weapon, what would they do with it? Would they fire it on to Israel. Iran would cease to exist a short while later.

7:00 minutes in. It sounds like Chris Matthews was trying very hard not to laugh after that line from Richard Engel.
 
Last edited:
Why are we anti-zionist? I don't think we should be involved with Israel's wars, but I don't have a problem with Israel existing.

The Zionists movement generally means the movement in europe after WW2 to give the Jews a place to live after all the horror they went through in Europe.
 
Back
Top