[Youtube] Ron Paul and Ed Schultz duke it out 5/20/09 [Digg]

dep't of agriculture.... are they in charge of peanut growers? Ed's a dick. way to go Ron.
 
You know, that guy was a real ass hole. Why invite someone on your show if all you're going to do is interrupt them. And honestly, I'm a little disappointed in Dr Paul for taking the bait. He jumped right into the argument at the end instead of keeping it civil. People like that Ed Schultz should not be on a news network.
 
You know, that guy was a real ass hole. Why invite someone on your show if all you're going to do is interrupt them. And honestly, I'm a little disappointed in Dr Paul for taking the bait. He jumped right into the argument at the end instead of keeping it civil. People like that Ed Schultz should not be on a news network.

are you kidding?

"You've gotta admit that you just don't care about hte constitution"

That's not taking the bait, that's ripping him a new asshole. Ron owned this fool, and kept his cool. he was pretty much laughing at him. :cool:
 
I like when in the beginning Ed starts to talk and Ron is just like WAIT.

Holy shit that guy starts going nuts, kind of a Billo rant going on there.


lol at the end Paul's just like "who is this fuckhole? why does he have a show? why bother wasting my time with this fool? There you go, whatever you want" and laughs it off.
 
I want to punch that fat bastard ED.

Holy krap what a peanut brained tard. The idiot is ignorant about economics, as if subsidizing farmers to not produce is going to make prices cheaper. What a freakin moron. Lets see, we PAY taxes which then go to farmers as subsidies to not produce to keep prices higher.

Seems like to me we are getting doubled screwed. he is a typical moron he thinks money from the government is "free". When in fact Americans are paying the subsidies+higher food prices as a result of restricting production.
 
hah what research did this guy even do. It sounds like he just read the mission statement of the department and claimed the people were for it. That was the basis of his whole argument. This guy actually believes government agencies provide for their stated function. What a chump.
 
If you look at departmental budgets way too much money is spent on studying the study that someone else did. There are essential and legitimate Federal functions for some of these departments, but if the legislature quit funding the crap, it would stop.

The legislature doesn't do that because its primary concern is perpetuating the system, not serving the people. It all comes back to an honest vote and an informed electorate. We will get neither unless the people unite to break free from corporate slavery.

In 1776 we declared our independence from Britain. We fought for years to assert that independence, then we squabbled amongst ourselves for a few years before we came up with a "Constitution" or basic principles of national law. It had to happen in that order for it to happen at all.

Dr. Paul had his priorities in order.

First comes the the Declaration - that hasn't even happened yet because most of the people in this country don't really understand the fix we are in.

Second comes the Revolution - overthrowing the old and putting a new power base in control that will respect and protect the rights of the individual.

Third - the reorganization of government around the consent of an informed electorate. Forms, laws, etc. to be decided LATER - after the revolution.

I think Paul did a good job of cramming his message in between attacks.
 
wow. how on earth did the human race survive before the US Department of Agriculture was created?

/sarcasm
 
What a great argument at the beginning.
Back in the olden days local government was fine, but now that we've advanced, it's best to let the bureaucrats in Washington plan all of our lives.
 
LOL! That was awesome. Ron came prepared to handle the abuse and kept getting in those counter-punches. This interview makes me so proud of the old man :-)
 
Back
Top