As a grown up adult, I couldn't care less. I have my own standards and none of them depend on being endorsed by Ron Paul, you, or anyone else.
If the campaign can watch a video of that poor man being dragged away by police, begging for them to stop, and being brought to the ground injured and in agony, and not make a comment about it, then there's something wrong with them.
What's the charlatan's name that sic'd the bulldogs on the older gentleman? Not sure what avenue to take as we are on our own on this as the campaign fiddles, but I feel like grouping up like some locusts and swarming something.
As a grown up adult, I couldn't care less. I have my own standards and none of them depend on being endorsed by Ron Paul, you, or anyone else.
If the campaign can watch a video of that poor man being dragged away by police, begging for them to stop, and being brought to the ground injured and in agony, and not make a comment about it, then there's something wrong with them.
I also expect that Ron Paul will be upset that anyone was hurt because of his campaign.
I wouldn't be so sure. When one of ours got struck in the back in OK, the campaign didn't seem too upset about that; in fact, "the campaign" admonished us against booing Prince Romney instead, or our lack of decorum or something. The point is, there was never any statement about our supporter getting assaulted. You are 100% right, however, that time will tell. I certainly HOPE they make some kind of statement. I haven't heard from anyone in the campaign about anything lately though.
A question for this forum:
What is the difference between expecting the "campaign" stepping in and saying doing something every-time there is a scuffle or disagreement and the "government" from stepping in every time there is a scuffle or disagreement?
I thought this was about INDIVIDUALISM & LIBERTY not changing the name of the collective that rules us ... am I wrong.
A question for this forum:
What is the difference between expecting the "campaign" stepping in and saying doing something every-time there is a scuffle or disagreement and the "government" from stepping in every time there is a scuffle or disagreement?
I thought this was about INDIVIDUALISM & LIBERTY not changing the name of the collective that rules us ... am I wrong.
Agreed, we need to own this and be the ones that are solely responsible. Looks like the training wheels are off, and we've hit the pavement. Time to just keep on trucking. Expose these people and inspire more to come. My first response to this video was...![]()
A question for this forum:
What is the difference between expecting the "campaign" stepping in and saying doing something every-time there is a scuffle or disagreement.
What's the charlatan's name that sic'd the bulldogs on the older gentleman? Not sure what avenue to take as we are on our own on this as the campaign fiddles, but I feel like grouping up like some locusts and swarming something.