Your Guns Must be Stored at a Government Authorized Storage Depot

presence

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
19,330
New Proposal Will Force Gun Owners to Store Assault Weapons
At Government Authorized Storage Depots





Because you can never have too many laws, regulations and mandates,

Massachusetts State Representative David Linsky has filed a new bill that would, among other things, force gun owners to undergo mental health background checks, acquire liability insurance, pay an additional 25% tax on all forms of ammunition, and require firearms categorized as “assault weapons” to be stored outside of their homes and only at government approved storage depots.


“This bill is a comprehensive effort to reduce all types of gun violence – murders, intentional shootings, accidental shootings and suicides. There is not one solution to reducing gun violence – we can’t eliminate it – but there are a lot of common-sense steps that we can take to significantly reduce the everyday tragedy of gun violence and deaths,” said Linsky.

“I have spoken with hundreds of people over the past few weeks in developing this legislation – victims, police officers, criminologists, physicians, and yes – gun owners and sportsmen,” stated Linsky. “There are a lot of good ideas out there. We should all have one goal – reducing gun violence and trying to keep more tragedies from happening.”


Provisions in the bill include:

  • Having one standard of the issuance of all gun licenses, giving local police chiefs the ability to evaluate all aspects of an application for a gun license.
  • Requires proof of liability insurance for possession of a firearm, rifle or shotgun.
  • Requires that all large capacity weapons and grandfathered assault weapons must be stored at gun clubs or target ranges.
  • Requires live shooting as part of the curriculum for a basic firearms safety course; this is not a current requirement.
  • Requires all applicants for gun licenses and FID cards to sign a waiver of mental health records for reviewto be destroyed after decision.
  • Imposes 25% sales tax on ammunition, firearms, shotguns, and rifles; dedicates funds towards firearms licensing, police training, mental health services, and victim’s services.
  • Brings Massachusetts into compliance with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).
  • Limits gun buyers to one firearm purchase per month.
Source: Natick Patch

Bills such as this one are being filed by irrationally driven anti-gunners all over the country.

They are targeting every aspect of firearms in an effort to first reduce ownership, and then to ultimately ban it altogether.

They’ll expand the definitions for mental health to include basic forms of stress and normal human mood fluctuations and designate these as mental health conditions that would disqualify you from owning a gun.

They’ll tax gun purchases and ammunition like they’ve done with cigarettes (tripling the cost over a decade) and require huge insurance premiums, making ownership unaffordable for most Americans.

They’ll track the sale and transfer of all firearms through registration, with unjust punishments for anyone engaging in black-market trading.

And, eventually, another crisis – likely one that purports to threaten the very security and stability of the government of the United States – will be used in an attempt institute a complete roundup of the majority of modern firearms.


A full out
assault on the Second Amendment
is underway.




Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 14,407 people
Date: January 18th, 2013
Website: www.SHTFplan.com


Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.

..
 
Last edited:
This is usually reserved for out of line LEO's but this jerk qualifies in spades!

hang.gif
Get a rope! :mad:
 
The only way my guns will be stored off site in a government run facility will be if they come and try to take them. Thus proving the need for personal defense.
 
Gun control debate summarized : Liberals believe guns kill people themselves without an operator, conservatives believe guns never kill people and any control will lead to genocide.
 
Americans like their guns and demand to keep them handy...
NEW MOVIE: Guns, small guns, BIG GUNS
(bad guys sure have 'em, so why not get granny one too?)

 
That's Mass for you. I mentioned this earlier today in a similar thread. The statists in MA are going nuts. They are proposing NY style gun laws and 3 billion a year in tax and fee increases.

The best thing for the liberty lovers in MA to do is join the Free State Project and move to New Hampshire. We have already had dozens of earlier movers from MA. A few of them have even been elected to the NH House.
 
Gun control debate summarized : Liberals believe guns kill people themselves without an operator, conservatives believe guns never kill people and any control will lead to genocide.

Or, the state should not interfere with an individual's self-determination unless that individual is suspected of violating another individual's life, liberty, or property.
 
Gun control debate summarized : Liberals believe guns kill people themselves without an operator, conservatives believe guns never kill people and any control will lead to genocide.

Or, the state should not interfere with an individual's self-determination unless that individual is suspected of violating another individual's life, liberty, or property.
 
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
 
Or, the state should not interfere with an individual's self-determination unless that individual is suspected of violating another individual's life, liberty, or property.

that's a good loophole right there.
 
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"
"Shall not be infringed"

the other guy said "unless he's suspected of violating another person's life, liberty or property", you can't both be right.
 
t shirt needs 4 words across the chest...

"Shall not be infringed"
 
Last edited:
hey Rep. Linsky...you're the one that needs a mental 'exam'

oh, and one more thing....Molon Labe
 
The reminds me of what I read in history. The British are coming the British are coming. Lexington and Concord...
 
Back
Top