You can't catch a virus. It's all scientism nonsense.

orafi

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,426
https://booksrun.com/textbooks/9783...DkfnweasG1D-FwPmbEZ9dEuebGrEwPDAaAo9REALw_wcB

61-SR4PYKNL.jpg
 


Did This All Happen Before?


The Daniel Natal Show
July 1, 2022


The 19th Century was rife with fake philanthropy movements, from temperance leagues, to anti-smoking groups, to hygiene organizations. One of these movements was organized about spreading hysteria and panic related to syphilis . . . regardless of the fact that syphilis was not a pressing danger to the society (based on its small size and mild symptoms). Nevertheless, repressive laws were instituted to fight it and "irresponsible power" given to the government--in the name of a disease whose dangers were wildly exaggerated. Sound familiar?
 
????

show me where a PhD author says "you can't catch a virus" because I've caught viruses from people in my life
so the quote just doesn't make sense to me.
 
I'm intrigued about the book.

One thing is for sure. Scientists know very little about viruses so it wouldn't surprise me if the whole virus theory is wrong.


Excerpt:

The authors of Virus Mania, journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and doctor of internal medicine Claus Köhnlein, MD, the general practitioner and research physician Samantha Bailey, MD, and the expert in microbiology Stefano Scoglio, BSc PhD, show that these alleged contagious viruses may be, in fact, alternatively be seen as particles produced by the cells themselves as a consequence of certain stress factors such as drugs and toxins. These particles are then identified by antibody and PCR tests and (wrongly) interpreted as epidemic-causing viruses by doctors who have been indoctrinated for over 100 years by the theory that microbes are deadly and only modern medications and vaccines will protect us from virus pandemics. The central aim of this book is to steer the discussion back to a real scientific debate and put medicine back on the path of an impartial analysis of the facts. It will put medical experiments, clinical trials, statistics and government policies under the microscope, revealing that the people charged with protecting our health and safety have deviated from this path. Along the way, Engelbrecht, Köhnlein, Bailey and Scoglio will analyze all possible causes of illness such as pharmaceuticals, lifestyle drugs, pesticides, heavy metals, pollution, stress and processed (and sometimes genetically modified) foods. All of these can heavily damage the body of humans and animals and even kill them.

...

This book's central focus is to steer this discussion back to where a scientific debate belongs: on the path to prejudice-free analysis of facts. To clarify one more time, the point is not to show that diseases like cervical cancer, SARS, AIDS or hepatitis C do not exist.* No serious critic of reigning virus theories has any doubt that people or animals are or could be come sick... Instead, the central question is: What really causes these diseases known as cervical cancer, avian flue, SARS, AIDS and hepatitis C? Is it a virus? Is it a virus in combination with other causes? Or is it not a virus at all, but rather something very different?

---

Lydia's Review of 'Virus Mania' by Torsten Engelbrecht, Dr. Claus Kohnlein and more

 
????

show me where a PhD author says "you can't catch a virus" because I've caught viruses from people in my life
so the quote just doesn't make sense to me.

Read the book ����
Or Goodbye Germ Theory

The phd is overrated and gay
 
????

show me where a PhD author says "you can't catch a virus" because I've caught viruses from people in my life
so the quote just doesn't make sense to me.

MD is a PhD in medicine. So. The book is written by a PhD :shrugging:

It's just a fundamental failure to understand the reality of the human biome. You have in your body, right now, pretty much every infectious organism that has ever infected any human on the planet, ever. You surely have every known variant of COVID in your body, and possibly undiscovered variants. The question is not whether it "exists" somewhere within the surface of your skin, as though health is a question of scrubbing away all the dirty organisms from inside of you. Rather, it's a question of whether the infectious organism is able to spread enough that it requires your immune system to mount a vigorous response. I can't remember the timestamp, but Kary Mullis (inventor of the PCR test, and Nobel prize-winner) explains this in some side-remarks during the following interview (extremely worthwhile to watch, in its own right):

 
That’s not the point I’m making. It’s an appeal to
Authority. You can be a phd in things that make sense or things that don’t make sense.
 
Back
Top