Yet another vaccine researcher caught faking research

[donnay]

Vaccination: The Hidden Truth

To summarize in broad terms, instead of resulting in prophylaxis, meaning prevention, all responses to vaccines actually fall under the broad umbrella of anaphylaxis, which means sensitisation, the OPPOSITE of immunization. In this extremely informative video, fifteen people, including Dr. Viera Scheibner (a PhD researcher), five medical doctors, other researchers, reveal what is really going on in relation to illness and vaccines. Ironically, the important facts come from the orthodox medicine’s own peer-reviewed research.

With so much government and medical promotion of vaccination for prevention of disease, the video is clearly devoted to presenting the other side of the issue that parents and others are not being told. The result is a damning account of the ineffectiveness of vaccines and their often harmful effects. It declares that parents are not being told the truth by the media, the Health Department and the medical establishment, with a medical doctor, Dr. Mark Donohoe, confessing that "It is a problem for me that I am part of a profession that is systematically lying to people…"

The video presents well documented answers to questions like: Was it really vaccines that saved us? Why are they only counterproductive? How are many statistics misleading? What do vaccines contain? What are they doing to our organs, immune systems, even our genes? Are childhood diseases really dangerous to healthy children? Why does vaccination continue? What are our rights? Can vaccine damage be evaluated and countered? What is the true key to immunity?

The video raises the fundamental question of whether we should be trying to prevent childhood diseases anyway, in that they contribute to the development of a healthy immune system. If what the video says is true, why is vaccination pushed so heavily by the government authorities? (Excerpt from vaccination.inoz.com)

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/vaccination-the-hidden-truth/


Watch the full documentary now

 

[silverhandorder]

Vaccination: The Hidden Truth

Yeah yeah like every other conspiracy. If it was hidden you sure as hell would not know about it. And if it was so easy to prove as to just show a video sure as hell all of us would know.

 

[donnay]

Yeah yeah like every other conspiracy. If it was hidden you sure as hell would not know about it. And if it was so easy to prove as to just show a video sure as hell all of us would know.

Do you have any idea the ingredients that are in vaccines? Have you ever asked a doctor if s/he would guarantee that the vaccine would not cause any detrimental side effects to you or your child? I have, and the doctor would not guarantee me that the vaccine would not cause any detrimental side effects, and then told me the benefits outweigh the risks.

Dismiss it if you want. I choose not to. I have had about 10 vaccines in my entire life...that was before I decided to research vaccines and realize that I have an immune system for a reason.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Dismiss it if you want. I choose not to. I have had about 10 vaccines in my entire life...that was before I decided to research vaccines and realize that I have an immune system for a reason.

And you aren't dead, paralyzed or sterilized or autistic? I thought all vaccines caused those things. How far along are you in your soft kill death?

 

[NewRightLibertarian]

I could say the same about you putting your kids at risk by not getting the shot.

It would depend on the particular shot if I had children. I'd definitely keep them away from H1N1 or Gardasil type bullshit for sure.

 

[Ender]

Snakeoil salesman have voluntary customers getting defrauded.

Pharma companies are no different then 95% of society who use government as a rent seeking vehicle. Admit it you don't like big pharma and not the fact that they get subsidies.

Perhaps you ought to know that snake oil is actually beneficial and healthy. It was so popular that the government made it illegal, as it was used in the beginnings of Big Pharma.

Just like hemp was made illegal because of Big Steel and Cotton. During the FF's days, people who didn't grow hemp were taxed. It was so useful that the big Steel/Cotton companies could not handle the competition. Same for snake oil.

The liars, then, were the government; not much has changed.

 

[Ender]

Yeah yeah like every other conspiracy. If it was hidden you sure as hell would not know about it. And if it was so easy to prove as to just show a video sure as hell all of us would know.

Kind of a hypocritical POV for someone who has Snowden as his avatar.

 

[donnay]

Deadly Vaccine Kills 8 Infants; Drug Maker Says Deaths “Coincidental”

Jeffry John Aufderheide
VacTruth.com
December 29th, 2013

Eight babies in China have died in the past two months shortly after being injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine, according to an article in the New York Times. The deaths are being investigated and linked to vaccine manufacturer Kangtai Biological Products (BioKangtai). [1]

The Hepatitis B vaccine is now suspended until further notice.

Some of the details have not been released, however from what we do know, the infants died two days or less after being vaccinated. [2]

But, there’s more to the story.

Deaths Are “Coincidental”

What is even more disturbing is the well-rehearsed script given to media outlets.

For example, the Mail Online reports, “In a statement earlier this month, the company [BioKangtai] said it was confident in the safety of its products and that the deaths could be caused by underlying diseases that were incubating in the babies and coincidentally started showing symptoms after the inoculations.” [3]

Contrary to this ignorant statement by the pharmaceutical company, one father was told by doctors his child was in good condition shortly after being born. The baby died about an hour after being injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine. [4]

Your Child is the 1-in-a-Million

Of course, due to public backlash, the Spin Doctors must react quickly to prevent any breach of confidence in the vaccination program.

The China Daily cites Jia Jidong, of Beijing Friendship Hospital, saying, “Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent newborns from hepatitis B even if it, like all other medical procedures, is never risk free,” and that, “The hepatitis B vaccine is safe…The incidence of very severe abnormal reactions is one in every 100,000, one in every 1 million or even lower.” [5]

This person is obviously parroting what is learned in medical school, or possibly even paid to stay on message like doctors are in the United States. [6-9]

Many parents have heard similar mantras about their child being “one in a million” repeated to them when it is obvious a vaccine has injured their baby. Don’t believe it.

You can see this evidence for yourself by visiting Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) or visiting the website Ian’s Voice. [10,11]

Conclusion

The simple truth is this: there is no safe vaccine and you can never unvaccinate your child. If you live in the United States, be aware that the court systems have protected the vaccine manufacturers from any legal liability.

As a parent, you take on all of the risk of vaccinating your child. Death or mutilation from a vaccine is an acceptable sacrifice for the medical establishment to keep the gears turning.

If you are saddened or frustrated by what happened in this article, turn your feelings into action and help your own child. You may not know these parents by name, but you still can help.

Download the list of vaccine ingredients right now and see for yourself what is being injected into your baby. Share your experience with others and tell other parents about these resources.

References

1.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/26/w...igates-vaccine-maker-after-infant-deaths.html
2.http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/833500.shtml
3.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...aths-babies-received-hepatitis-B-vaccine.html
4.http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/article_xinhua.aspx?id=189363
5.http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/2013-12/25/content_17196021.htm
6.http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/jul/22/glaxosmithkline-admits-bribery-china
7.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/16/business/global/glaxo-used-travel-firms-in-bribery-china-says.html
8.http://www.scmp.com/news/china-insi...er-also-targeted-chinese-pharmaceutical-probe
9.http://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/
10.http://www.medalerts.org/
11.http://www.iansvoice.org/

Source: http://vactruth.com/2013/12/27/vaccine-kills-8-infants/

 

[silverhandorder]

Perhaps you ought to know that snake oil is actually beneficial and healthy. It was so popular that the government made it illegal, as it was used in the beginnings of Big Pharma.

Just like hemp was made illegal because of Big Steel and Cotton. During the FF's days, people who didn't grow hemp were taxed. It was so useful that the big Steel/Cotton companies could not handle the competition. Same for snake oil.

The liars, then, were the government; not much has changed.

Like snake oil salesman were actually selling snake oil. Plus you seems to promote anything that is not a big pharma product. So your claims about benefits of snake oil are automatically suspect.

Kind of a hypocritical POV for someone who has Snowden as his avatar.

Snowden is confirmed to have worked for the government. He has credibility. Your sources do not. I used to pay attention to conspiracy theorists. Any time I wanted to find out if the primary sources existed the trail would disappear.

Even better I just realized if what you saying is true Russia and China would be just as involved as they are with Snowden to get this information out to hurt US credibility.

 

[Ender]

Like snake oil salesman were actually selling snake oil. Plus you seems to promote anything that is not a big pharma product. So your claims about benefits of snake oil are automatically suspect.


Snowden is confirmed to have worked for the government. He has credibility. Your sources do not. I used to pay attention to conspiracy theorists. Any time I wanted to find out if the primary sources existed the trail would disappear.

Even better I just realized if what you saying is true Russia and China would be just as involved as they are with Snowden to get this information out to hurt US credibility.

Yes, snake oil salesmen were actually selling snake oil. Do you think someone just made that term up? The government made it sound evil so that people would not buy it- sorta like sticking the Mexican slang word for cannabis on to a popular drug- Voila! Now we have marijuana, which is eeevvvviiilll.

So Snowden has credibility because he worked for the government? Do you really believe that?

 

[amy31416]

Yes, snake oil salesmen were actually selling snake oil. Do you think someone just made that term up? The government made it sound evil so that people would not buy it- sorta like sticking the Mexican slang word for cannabis on to a popular drug- Voila! Now we have marijuana, which is eeevvvviiilll.

So Snowden has credibility because he worked for the government? Do you really believe that?

From two minutes of reading up on the history of snake oil--just scanned articles, you're wrong. There usually was not real snake oil, it was touted as a cure-all, and it came from the Chinese who are the ones who referred to it as snake oil (Chinese vendors often had real snake oil.)

And you're changing the subject. Bad form.

 

[Ender]

From two minutes of reading up on the history of snake oil--just scanned articles, you're wrong. There usually was not real snake oil, it was touted as a cure-all, and it came from the Chinese who are the ones who referred to it as snake oil (Chinese vendors often had real snake oil.)

And you're changing the subject. Bad form.

I didn't bring up the term "snake oil"; so bad form backatcha.

SNAKE OIL SALESMAN – THE TRUE STORY
Aug 5, 2011Posted By: igorUnder: Complementary Alternative Medicine, Historical Notes

The term “Snake Oil Salesman” for most people brings to mind notions of a “charlatan”, the “huckster” who years gone by was noted for his peddling of worthless nostrums and quack remedies that made all manner of health claims. The salesman’s character was that of a fast talker who with a certain twisted charm and verbal misdirection, could convince the consumers of the late 1800’s and early 1900’s that his medicinals were capable of curing all manner of disease or for that matter, regain lost youth and grow hair on a billiard ball.

It’s unfortunate that the term “snake oil” became associated with that description of salesman, because snake oil per se, has a very different story, based on some good science. Historically, snake oil saw use by the Chinese who immigrated to North America, many to labour on the building of the railways. Their labours were very physical, as they worked to lay the track that gradually connected all of North America.

Of course, as a result of their labours, they found the need to alleviate muscular and joint aches, a result of this very physical work. What they brought with them was in fact snake oil, that when rubbed on the skin above the area of pain brought relief, or at least as it was reported. This story had to wait until 1989 before a nutrition-oriented physician from California; Dr. Richard Kunin decided to find out just what was in snake oil that may have given it this pain relieving ability.

He went to San Francisco’s Chinatown obtained the snake oil and had it analyzed. What he found was that it contains 75% unidentified carrier material, likely emulsifying ingredients which would help the oil mix with other ingredients and including the liquid base, as well as to aiding the oil to penetrate the skin and tissue when applied. He also found this product to contain camphor, but the remaining 25% was oil from Chinese water snakes, which contains 20% of the important omega 3 derivative eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) as well as 48% oleic acid and 7% linoleic plus arachidonic acids. At 20% EPA, Chinese water snake is the richest known natural source of the parent of Series 3 prostaglandins, which inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory Series 2 prostaglandins.

These are naturally occurring lipid compounds in the body derived from the enzyme-controlled oxidation of fatty acids and have a long list of important functions. At the risk of over simplifying, Series 1 and 2 prostaglandins are the “good” prostaglandins. Where the Series 1 prostaglandins, made from linoleic acid lower blood pressure, decrease inflammation, improve nerve function, the Series 3 prostaglandins are derived from EPA and can prevent the production of the “bad” Series 2 prostaglandins.

Like essential fatty acids and their other derivatives, EPA can be absorbed through our skin. Salmon Oil, the next-best source of EPA, contains a maximum of 18% EPA, with other fish oils containing less.

Those eyeing our native Rattlesnake should approach with caution for several reasons, one being that not all snake oils contain 20% EPA and in fact, Rattlesnake oil contains only 8.5% EPA with many other snake oils never being tested.

The moral of this story – traditional snake oil is natural and therapeutic. The true snake oil salesman you could say, has been vindicated. What about the report by Dr. Kunin? Well, he submitted his findings to the New England Journal of Medicine but they were unwilling to publish it. Although we were certain that our readers would be interested in the information.

 

[donnay]

From two minutes of reading up on the history of snake oil--just scanned articles, you're wrong. There usually was not real snake oil, it was touted as a cure-all, and it came from the Chinese who are the ones who referred to it as snake oil (Chinese vendors often had real snake oil.)

And you're changing the subject. Bad form.

History

Snake oil originally came from China, where it is called shéyóu (蛇油). There, it was used as a remedy for inflammation and pain in rheumatoid arthritis, bursitis, and other similar conditions. Snake oil is still used as a pain reliever in China. Fats and oils from snakes are higher in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) than other sources. Snake oil is still sold in traditional Chinese pharmacy stores.

Snake fat also played a role in ancient Egyptian medicine, mixed with the fats of lion, hippopotamus, crocodile, tomcat, and Nubian ibex into a homogeneous mass believed to cause bald men to grow hair.[1]

Chinese labourers on railroad gangs involved in building the Transcontinental Railroad to link North America coast to coast gave snake oil to Europeans with joint pain. When rubbed on the skin at the painful site, snake oil was claimed to bring relief. This claim was ridiculed by rival medicine salesmen, especially those selling patent medicines. In time, snake oil became a generic name for many compounds marketed as panaceas or miraculous remedies whose ingredients were usually secret, unidentified, or mis-characterized and mostly inert or ineffective, although the placebo effect might provide some relief for whatever the problem might have been.

Patented remedies originated in England, where a patent was granted to Richard Stoughton's Elixir in 1712.[2] Since there was no federal regulation in the USA concerning safety and effectiveness of drugs until the 1906 Food and Drugs Act[3] and various medicine salesmen or manufacturers seldom had enough skills in analytical chemistry to analyze the contents of snake oil, it became the archetype of hoax. American snake fats have EPA contents markedly lower than those of the Chinese water snake. Thus, the American snake oils were even less effective in relieving joint pain than the original Chinese snake oil, further promoting the hoax stereotype.

http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Snake_oil.html

 

[amy31416]

Aug 5, 2011Posted By: igorUnder: Complementary Alternative Medicine, Historical Notes

Good source.

Conveniently ignores the vast numbers of snake oil salesmen who made their money claiming it cured everything under the sun and didn't even contain snake oil.

 

[donnay]

Do You Believe More Vaccines or Better Nutrition Prevents Disease?

The National Institute of Health recently announced an expansion of its funding of nine Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units with an annual budget of $135 million dollars of government money. Each of the nine research centers can compete with each year for the next seven years for a portion of this funding. [1]

The effort to decrease disease outbreaks by increasing the funding of vaccine studies is misguided. Financial and medical resources could be better spent focusing on the underlying causes of illnesses. Functional medicine has established that most diseases are caused by nutritional deficiencies and toxic overload, which together suppresses the immune system, making one susceptible to disease. [2]

Vaccines Decrease Immune System Functioning and Fail to Prevent Disease

The National Institute of Health established Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units in 1962 to conduct hundreds of vaccination clinical trials. The VTEUs include Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital, Duke Medicine, Atlanta’s Emory University, the Group Health Research Institute in Seattle, Saint Louis University, the University of Iowa, Baltimore’s University of Maryland and Nashville’s Vanderbilt University. Clinical vaccine trials involve the following diseases: influenza, pneumonia, pertussis, haemophiles influenzae Type B infection, cholera, anthrax, malaria, tuberculosis, childhood vaccines and combination vaccines. [3]

While the idea that vaccinations can safely prevent disease is an attractive one, unfortunately research and data do not support this theory. Ironically, the actual impact of vaccinations is to increase one’s exposure to dangerous toxins and poisons, which weakens the immune system, making one more susceptible to disease.

Renowned neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock has established that vaccinations decrease cellular immunity which is critical for fighting diseases. Vaccinations have been shown to increase the antibodies for a particular targeted disease for a limited length of time. Scientists mistakenly equate this increase in antibody creation to immunity from disease. Unfortunately, increasing antibodies has never been proven to be effective in reducing disease likelihood. [4]

Population studies universally show that vaccinated populations experience more disease outbreaks than those with no vaccinations. In a 1992 New Zealand study comparing 226 vaccinated to 229 unvaccinated children, the results overwhelmingly showed that the unvaccinated children suffered far less from chronic childhood illnesses including tonsillitis, sleep apnea, hyperactivity, ear infections, and epilepsy.

An Africa study done in 2000, covering a six-year period and examining the health of 15,000 children, showed that the death rate from diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough was twice as high in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children.

A 2011 German study of 8,000 unvaccinated children, with medical documentation from birth to age nineteen, showed vaccinated children have at least two to five times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. [5]

Vaccinations have never been proven to prevent illness and are, in reality, one of the greatest medical myths in existence. Research comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated children consistently show that unvaccinated children enjoy better health compared to those vaccinated.

In addition, when there are outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, studies show that the majority of those with the disease have received immunizations for the illness. This data provides additional evidence that vaccines do not provide immunity to disease.

Continued...

 

[Ender]

Good source.

Conveniently ignores the vast numbers of snake oil salesmen who made their money claiming it cured everything under the sun and didn't even contain snake oil.

There was one:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2013/08/26/215761377/a-history-of-snake-oil-salesmen

A History Of 'Snake Oil Salesmen'
by LAKSHMI GANDHI
August 26, 201311:55 AM
"Snake Oil Salesman." The phrase conjures up images of seedy profiteers trying to exploit an unsuspecting public by selling it fake cures. In fact, the Oxford English Dictionary defines snake oil as "a quack remedy or panacea." What the OED does not note, however, is that the history of snake oil is linked to an often forgotten chapter of Asian-American history.

i
Made from the oil of the Chinese water snake, which is rich in the omega-3 acids that help reduce inflammation, snake oil in its original form was effective, especially when used to treat arthritis and bursitis.

Jagrap/Flickr
Because the words "snake oil" are so evocative, it has been a favorite go-to phrase for politicians and lobbying groups on both sides of the aisle. Earlier this month, Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell called his opponent in the Republican primary, Tea Party candidate Matt Bevin, a snake oil salesman in a campaign mailer. While campaigning for a second term last year, President Obama referred to the Romney-Ryan tax plan as "trickle-down snake oil" at a rally. In 2008, the Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund took out full-page ads in The Washington Post to denounce then-President George W. Bush's plan to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, calling it "100 percent snake oil."

But what, exactly, is snake oil? And why is peddling it such a terrible thing?

The 1800s saw thousands of Chinese workers arriving in the United States as indentured laborers to work on the Transcontinental Railroad. According to historian Richard White's book Railroaded, about 180,000 Chinese immigrated to the United States between 1849 and 1882. The vast majority of the workers came from peasant families in southeastern China and were signed to contracts that ran up to five years for relatively low wages (compared with their white counterparts), wrote David Haward Bain in his book Empire Express.

Among the items the Chinese railroad workers brought with them to the States were various medicines — including snake oil. Made from the oil of the Chinese water snake, which is rich in the omega-3 acids that help reduce inflammation, snake oil in its original form really was effective, especially when used to treat arthritis and bursitis. The workers would rub the oil, used for centuries in China, on their joints after a long hard day at work. The story goes that the Chinese workers began sharing the oil with some American counterparts, who marveled at the effects.

So how did a legitimate medicine become a symbol of fraud? The origins of snake oil as a derogatory phrase trace back to the latter half of the 19th century, which saw a dramatic rise in the popularity of "patent medicines." Often sold on the back pages of newspapers, these tonics promised to cure a wide variety of ailments including chronic pain, headaches, "female complaints" and kidney trouble. In time, all of these false "cures" began to be referred to as snake oil.

As word of the healing powers of Chinese snake oil grew, many Americans wondered how they could make their own snake oil here in the United States. Because there were no Chinese water snakes handy in the American West, many healers began using rattlesnakes to make their own versions of snake oil.

This set the stage for entrepreneur Clark Stanley, aka The Rattlesnake King. In an 1897 pamphlet about Stanley's life and exploits, the former cowboy claimed he had learned about the healing power of rattlesnake oil from Hopi medicine men. He never publicly mentioned Chinese snake oil at all. Stanley created a huge stir at the 1893 World's Exposition in Chicago when he took a live snake and sliced it open before a crowd of onlookers.

Joe Schwarcz, the director of McGill University's Office for Science and Society, described the scene in this 2008 article:


How did a legitimate medicine become a symbol of fraud?

Wikimedia Commons
"[Stanley] reached into a sack, plucked out a snake, slit it open and plunged it into boiling water. When the fat rose to the top, he skimmed it off and used it on the spot to create 'Stanley's Snake Oil,' a liniment that was immediately snapped up by the throng that had gathered to watch the spectacle."

There were two major problems with Stanley's claim about his oil:

First, rattlesnake oil was far less effective than the original Chinese snake oil it was trying to emulate. A 1989 letter to The Western Journal of Medicine from psychiatrist and researcher Richard Kunin revealed that the Chinese oil contained almost triple the amount of a vital acid as did rattlesnake oil.

Secondly, Stanley's Snake Oil didn't contain any snake oil at all. The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 sought to clamp down on the sale of patent medicines and it was that legislation that led to Stanley's undoing. After seizing a shipment of Stanley's Snake Oil in 1917, federal investigators found that it primarily contained mineral oil, a fatty oil believed to be beef fat, red pepper and turpentine. That's right — Stanley's signature product did not contain a drop of actual snake oil, and hundreds of consumers discovered they had been had.

It was probably around then that snake oil became symbolic of fraud. Snake oil salesmen and traveling doctors became stock characters in American Westerns. The first written usage of the phrase appeared in Stephen Vincent Benet's epic 1927 poem John Brown's Body, when the poet refers to "Crooked creatures of a thousand dubious trades ... sellers of snake-oil balm and lucky rings." About 30 years later, playwright Eugene O'Neill referred to snake oil in his 1956 play The Iceman Cometh, when a character suggested that a rival was "standing on a street corner in hell right now, making suckers of the damned, telling them there's nothing like snake oil for a bad burn."

As for what happened to Clark Stanley after it was found that his whole empire was based on a lie? He was fined $20 (that's about $429 in today's dollars) for violating the food and drug act and for "misbranding" his product by "falsely and fraudulently represent[ing] it as a remedy for all pain."

Stanley did not dispute the charges.