Yet another FBI setup, this time "anarchists"

[Noble Savage]

what would be great is if a group fronted as violent anarchist to document undercover agents involvement

 

[Kluge]

what would be great is if a group fronted as violent anarchist to document undercover agents involvement

That would be interesting. You'd have to have someone who's totally anal about keeping records so you could both figure out what draws them to you and get out of prison. Plus you'd have to be very smart, but willing to act really stupid. And have nobody that relies on you, like children or elderly parents.

 

[azxd]

Further proof of why you should never even consider violence. Don't muse about it. Don't fantasize about it. Be careful how you vent your frustrations in public forums.

All you have to do is suggest something silly like that and some agent of the government will make his acquaintance with you and lead you down a path to your arrest and imprisonment.



Hmmm.... Just heard a knock on the door... Be right back...

And the idiots wrote about their plans on facebook ... Tip off !!!

But some want to develop another conspiracy LOL
Sometimes things are exactly as they appear, and sometimes not ... But no evidence is needed for the conviction, when hatred rules the mind.

 

[azxd]

Well that's just super. At some point "right wing extremists" will be considered a domestic terror organization (basically already is), then we're really fucked. By this precedent we're all "supporting terrorism" even though noone here advocates violence.

GG. Secession please, while we still can.

Just another step closer. Sympathize with these anarchists? You're a terrorist.

TEA Party supporters are already classified as "right wing extremists" by the media, and some factions of LE ... And you want to associate US with anarchists who DO SUPPORT VIOLENCE ?

WTF are you trying to do ?

Ah,
Nevermind !!!
The media is capable of scouring this forum, and linking all the hatred together to show Ron Paul's supporters for what they really are.
Quite damaging to the movement, if you ask me ... And they don't even need to make stuff up.

 

[azxd]

There are many-a-flavors of anarchism. Typically the "anarchist" that get's demonized by the state is those of the leftist variety for they have no qualms in regards to initiating violence to "advance" their "goals". But those of us who are voluntaryists/AnCaps get lumped into this group with AnComm's and AnSyn's under the umbrella of "anarchists". So they come out and say simply "ANYONE THAT DOESN'T WISH FOR THEIR TO BE A STATE IS A TERRORIST!!!"

The majority of the unthinking public thinks of anarchists as some kind of violent astray group that just wishes for chaos upon society. The leftist anarchist tend to fit that mold (to be honest). This is just an effort to lump us all as one and to empower the state against a "new" enemy. OMG PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE IN THE STATE SO WE MUST KILL THEM ALL/TORTURE THEM/IMPRISON THEM/ETC...!!! HOW DARE THESE TRAITORS OF COLLECTIVISM!?!?! USA! USA! USA! WE ARE ONE PEOPLE UNITED!!! WE ARE ONE NOT INDIVIDUALS AND EVERYTHING IS COLLECTIVE!!!"

That, in my opinion, is why it was stupid for those who still want rule by law to refer to themselves as any kind of anarchist. But, that bridge has already been crossed.

Exactly, and it CAN hurt the movement immensely.

 

[TheTexan]

TEA Party supporters are already classified as "right wing extremists" by the media, and some factions of LE ... And you want to associate US with anarchists who DO SUPPORT VIOLENCE ?

A person who supports violence is by definition not an anarchist.

 

[Kluge]

Ah,
Nevermind !!!
The media is capable of scouring this forum, and linking all the hatred together to show Ron Paul's supporters for what they really are.
Quite damaging to the movement, if you ask me ... And they don't even need to make stuff up.

It's about time you admitted that you aren't a supporter. I mean, it's obvious that you don't put yourself in the "hater" category that you put all of us in.

 

[azxd]

A person who supports violence is by definition not an anarchist.

Oh,
I stand corected in my verbage use ... Those who hold no value for others possessions, and destroy things like little kids.

 

[azxd]

It's about time you admitted that you aren't a supporter. I mean, it's obvious that you don't put yourself in the "hater" category that you put all of us in.

If you honestly think one must HATE the system, to support Ron Paul ... I'll suggest that you have a very warped sense of what the movement is actually about.

The last time I checked, we were all working within the system, to effect change ... Crying due to an internal bias, doesn't help the movement, and doesn't change the system.
But it does allow those who are interested and curious to see a negative side of the movement.

 

[Kluge]

If you honestly think one must HATE the system, to support Ron Paul ... I'll suggest that you have a very warped sense of what the movement is actually about.

The last time I checked, we were all working within the system, to effect change ... Crying due to an internal bias, doesn't help the movement, and doesn't change the system.
But it does allow those who are interested and curious to see a negative side of the movement.

Your reading comprehension is abysmal.

Now go back, read it again and point out where I ever said that anyone has to hate anything.

I do believe that you're conflating "hate" with "criticism." And further, you confuse criticism with information-sharing. Those are basic words and concepts that you should have learned the meaning of long ago, unless you're 8, in which case you should learn them soon.

Good luck.

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

Why would a bunch of lefty anarchists wanna blow up a Federal Reserve branch? (It was mentioned as a potential target in one of the articles)

 

[JebSanderson]

Why would a bunch of lefty anarchists wanna blow up a Federal Reserve branch? (It was mentioned as a potential target in one of the articles)

Because most anarchists support the abolition of money.

 

[Endgame]

I can believe some 20-something Clevelanders are dumb enough to come up with an idea like this without FBI help. No one with a head on their shoulders sticks around that place.

 

[oyarde]

Why would a bunch of lefty anarchists wanna blow up a Federal Reserve branch? (It was mentioned as a potential target in one of the articles)

I dunno , but I got two bucks on 90% of unemployed leftists committing random acts of vandalism , not being able to find the Fed

 

[oyarde]

I can believe some 20-something Clevelanders are dumb enough to come up with an idea like this without FBI help. No one with a head on their shoulders sticks around that place.

What , you mean "The Mistake by the Lake " ??

 

[oyarde]

I can believe some 20-something Clevelanders are dumb enough to come up with an idea like this without FBI help. No one with a head on their shoulders sticks around that place.

What year was it the River caught on fire ?1969 ?

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

Because most anarchists support the abolition of money.

They gonna blow up Fort Knox too and take away all the gold and silver people have stored?

 

[JebSanderson]

They gonna blow up Fort Knox too and take away all the gold and silver people have stored?

I'd blow up Fort Knox with an atomic device containing cobalt and iodine, which would render the gold useless for 58 years Obviously I'd invest in gold beforehand and the value of my investment would skyrocket.

Oh and my name is Auric Goldfinger.

 

[Tyler_Durden]

This never would've happened if they would've simply followed my 1st two rules. Sigh.

 

[oyarde]

I'd blow up Fort Knox with an atomic device containing cobalt and iodine, which would render the gold useless for 58 years Obviously I'd invest in gold beforehand and the value of my investment would skyrocket.

Oh and my name is Auric Goldfinger.

I see no effect on the value of my silver , Goldfinger .