Wyoming is 1st state to reject science standards (no global warming hoax)

[PRB]

If global warming and global cooling is a natural occurrence, why hire scientists at the government level to promote man made global warming scams?

You answered your own question.

You basically said "If I'm right, why are people saying I'm wrong?"

Why not the lesson be about global cooling instead, since after all, that is the point in which we are headed (no warming in last 20 years has government scientists baffled LMAO) by many scientists - mini global ice age?

Source?

Is it because Gore and his elite power hungry, money stealing criminals won't be able to tax you in multiple ways?

No, because Gore or anybody else can easily buy stock in another company that exploits the fear of cooling, or government can still tax something else.

The northeast part of America just experienced their coldest winter EVER recorded in 120 years. If you look at the warming and cooling chart cycle over the last 400,000 years, we are at the top and there is no where but DOWN (global cooling).

Cherry picking expert. When you want to talk about cooling, you limit the discussion to America. When you want to downplay something, you look at a 400,000 year record, as if you're willing to live and die like people did 400,000 years ago (you can't even live like people did 100 years ago).

http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_ylt=AwrB8pElunZThFIAXHWJzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTI0aGJmOHZoBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDaW1nBG9pZANmNDM3MTU0NTBlNTdjZjhlMjkzMjdiODUyNzhhODU0OQRncG9zAzE5MwRpdANiaW5n?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Dglobal%2Bwarming%2Bcharts%26fr%3Daaplw%26fr2%3Dpiv-web%26spos%3D36%26nost%3D1%26tab%3Dorganic%26ri%3D193&w=500&h=395&imgurl=www.frot.co.nz%2Fsift%2Fimages_global_warming%2Fco2_temperature_chart.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frot.co.nz%2Fsift%2Fglobal_warming.htm&size=37.0KB&name=But+a+more+detailed+chart+would+reveal+that+the+CO2+rises+hundreds+of+...&p=global+warming+charts&oid=f43715450e57cf8e29327b85278a8549&fr2=piv-web&fr=aaplw&tt=But+a+more+detailed+chart+would+reveal+that+the+CO2+rises+hundreds+of+...&b=181&ni=21&no=193&ts=&tab=organic&sigr=11dc8p7t2&sigb=13rdjvos7&sigi=123ao0bq1&sigt=1291suhql&sign=1291suhql&.crumb=PArcC1UYyTx&fr=aaplw&fr2=piv-web

The warming cycle that started about 20,000 years ago way before the industrial revolution and your vehicle being on the road, has lead to the development and growth of humans.

So what do you predict next? Cooling?

When the earth plummets back down to an ice age area slowly over the next 100,000 years, it's going to be devastating to humans. Growing food basically becomes impossible. Only those living near the equator might survive...

Warming can be equally devastating, if it means droughts, even for 5-10 years.

 

[PRB]

Then how will people demonstrate that they care?

By, like you, knowing where not to live. If you call people who live in NO and NJ dipshits, I guess you have one leg up from them, you know and believe something they don't, one can even say you're more of an alarmist than they are.

 

[Lord Xar]

wrong, global warming does not equal taxing carbon emissions, if you believe that, YOU are agreeing with Al Gore. That's your problem.

lulz. Right-eeee-oooooo. What fairy tale are you living in? You believe the Obama admin, and its sycophantic media are slavishly frothing at the mouth pushing this hoax every single day... all friggin day cause they care about you? LULZZZ.

Nothing but more control, more taxation will ensue..... and as of this moment, correct - no taxation. But I like to think of this moment in time as the "IRAQ HAS WMD!!!!!" period.

....... and if there is global warming - tell me again how we can avoid another mini-ice age? We can't... The earth has always and will always go thru some minor, and some extreme climate changes. It is the nature of the beast. That is just the way it is. Taxing, controlling, new 'energy' commodity will not change that... oh, except line the pockets of the special interests.

If the government fucking cared about "global warming" they fucking stop all their damn wars.....



I was thinking the other day, if the dust bowl all of a sudden happened again.... the alarmists would screaming of "global warming"... lolol. Fucking travesty how easy this zombie nation swings to the symphony of government propaganda.

I found this interesting: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/17/pseudoscientists-eight-climate-claims-debunked/

 

[PRB]

lulz. Right-eeee-oooooo. What fairy tale are you living in? You believe the Obama admin, and its sycophantic media are slavishly frothing at the mouth pushing this hoax every single day... all friggin day cause they care about you? LULZZZ.

never said that.

Nothing but more control, more taxation will ensue..... and as of this moment, correct - no taxation. But I like to think of this moment in time as the "IRAQ HAS WMD!!!!!" period.

the difference is that if WMD and climate change are not comparable as far as threat to quality of life.

....... and if there is global warming - tell me again how we can avoid another mini-ice age? We can't... The earth has always and will always go thru some minor, and some extreme climate changes.

Just like you'll eventually die, except some scientists have more precise predictions than your generalizations. So not only will you die, you'll die before you're 100.

It is the nature of the beast. That is just the way it is. Taxing, controlling, new 'energy' commodity will not change that... oh, except line the pockets of the special interests.

And I said I'm opposed to taxation, didn't I?

If the government fucking cared about "global warming" they fucking stop all their damn wars.....

I was thinking the other day, if the dust bowl all of a sudden happened again.... the alarmists would screaming of "global warming"... lolol. Fucking travesty how easy this zombie nation swings to the symphony of government propaganda.

I found this interesting: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/17/pseudoscientists-eight-climate-claims-debunked/

 

[PaulConventionWV]

No, it wouldn't. You totally missed the point here when I said this.
CRU is neither the primary gatherer nor the authority on publishing global climate data, so if CRU went away, all their staff were liars, climate change theory would still stand (sadly, you can't even proven CRU staff were liars based on the emails).

I didn't miss that part at all. It doesn't matter how significant they are. If they are doing it, then there must be a reason for them to do it; a reason that may also motivate others to do it. Why would they falsify data if they were so insignificant that it wouldn't amount to anything?

 

[PaulConventionWV]

One thing PRB probably doesn't do is care enough to personally contribute to people in hurricanes. He declined to answer whether or not he gives to people in hurricanes.

He does, however, care enough to suggest that everyone should care.

Yep. Without any meaningful solutions, this all becomes pointless sophistry.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

I admitted I don't care about them. Are you heartless enough to admit it?

Then why do you care if we believe in global warming?

 

[PaulConventionWV]

I never said I cared. I never said you need to care, I was using the word heartless to describe myself, in case you wanted to come on my side.

Obviously "your side" cares about SOMETHING or else you wouldn't be arguing.

Now that I think about it, you didn't respond when I asked you what your reason was for arguing after you asked me if I was arguing with you for no reason. Now I know why. Global warming is just a joke to you. Is it real? Who cares? Just argue.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Cherry picking expert. When you want to talk about cooling, you limit the discussion to America. When you want to downplay something, you look at a 400,000 year record, as if you're willing to live and die like people did 400,000 years ago (you can't even live like people did 100 years ago).

So, what you're saying is that having the same temperature as we did 400,000 years ago would eliminate all of our knowledge and technology and make us also live like they did 400,000 years ago? Is that what you're so afraid of?

Warming can be equally devastating, if it means droughts, even for 5-10 years.

Oh, so it's droughts you're worried about? Then what are you doing about it?

 

[PRB]

Obviously "your side" cares about SOMETHING or else you wouldn't be arguing.

In my case, simply scientific data. What we do about it is entirely another story.

Now that I think about it, you didn't respond when I asked you what your reason was for arguing after you asked me if I was arguing with you for no reason. Now I know why. Global warming is just a joke to you. Is it real? Who cares? Just argue.

Global warming isn't just a joke for me, but it also isn't political for me.

 

[PRB]

Oh, so it's droughts you're worried about? Then what are you doing about it?

Being prepared for it. So I hopefully do not end up like Katrina and Sandy victims, or anybody whose life depends on stable water supply.

 

[PRB]

Then why do you care if we believe in global warming?

The same way I "care" if you believe in gravity or evolution, so I can mock you if you're wrong.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

In my case, simply scientific data. What we do about it is entirely another story.



Global warming isn't just a joke for me, but it also isn't political for me.

It may not be for you, but it IS political, whether you like it or not.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Being prepared for it. So I hopefully do not end up like Katrina and Sandy victims, or anybody whose life depends on stable water supply.

Sounds like pretty much what every human being has done since the beginning of mankind. Good strategy.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

The same way I "care" if you believe in gravity or evolution, so I can mock you if you're wrong.

How noble of you. It just goes to show you that those who most ardently defend science are the ones with the biggest pretense of knowledge. They just go around ridiculing people who don't believe in Theory X because they can't do actual science, but they sure as hell can jump on every perceived "consensus" and defend it like little minions by employing circular logic, studying up on the theory and referring back to it any time it's criticized in order to look smart.

 

[PRB]

How noble of you. It just goes to show you that those who most ardently defend science are the ones with the biggest pretense of knowledge.

Does it? or just that when facts and evidence are on your side, you get to be laugh at people who are delusional, ignorant, and otherwise wrong?

They just go around ridiculing people who don't believe in Theory X because they can't do actual science,

Can't do science is one thing, but being knowing ignorant is another.

but they sure as hell can jump on every perceived "consensus" and defend it like little minions by employing circular logic,

Perceived consensus? As opposed to what? Actual consensus? Got a definition for that?

studying up on the theory and referring back to it any time it's criticized in order to look smart.

Not any time it's criticized, just when it's criticized by people who have no idea what they're talking about.

 

[PRB]

Sounds like pretty much what every human being has done since the beginning of mankind. Good strategy.

Except people who are victims to hurricanes and earthquakes, if they were prepared they'd not be victims.

 

[PRB]

It may not be for you, but it IS political, whether you like it or not.

No, it's only political for people who make it so.

 

[PRB]

Just to put a nail in the coffin for the claim "UN, NWO, IPCC just made up global warming so they can tax us on carbon emissions to scam us into thinking we can reverse the climate changes"

Sorry, even the UN has given up on taxing, reducing, and mitigation now. So you can retire that old argument.
http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...surviving-not-stopping-climate-change/359929/

How about, listen to scientists, accept that global warming is true, and be prepared for it? I'm not saying pay any emissions taxes or reduce emissions, I've NEVER been in favor of government regulations, I've also never said cutting all carbon emissions tomorrow will have a noticeable effect.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

By, like you, knowing where not to live.

So you demonstrate your caring for others by knowing where to live?

If you call people who live in NO and NJ dipshits, I guess you have one leg up from them, you know and believe something they don't, one can even say you're more of an alarmist than they are.

I used to live in New Jersey, so should I call myself an alarmist?