Wyoming is 1st state to reject science standards (no global warming hoax)

[PRB]

Scarce these days. I rely on about as much science as you. I put my pants on one leg at a time just like anyone else.

I don't know. Give me some examples. I use things I need.

"are all government funded research gone to the wrong conclusions?It's pretty safe to say... yes."

You don't know. Surprise!

 

[fisharmor]

I only needed to see one picture of a global warming research thermometer set up next to a building's HVAC exhaust vent to realize this is all bullshit.

I thought when they got snowed out of their conference a couple years ago we'd be done with this fairy tale already.

 

[PRB]

I only needed to see one picture of a global warming research thermometer set up next to a building's HVAC exhaust vent to realize this is all bullshit.

I thought when they got snowed out of their conference a couple years ago we'd be done with this fairy tale already.

because one thermometer is all they rely on, forget the millions of others.

as for snowed out of a conference, your assumption is that global warming has no snow.

 

[jllundqu]

It's Global Cooling!!! er wait... It's Global Warming!!! no um.... It's Climate Change!!! dang it..... no, It's Global Climate Disruption! Yeah that's what it is! Now pay your fair share!

 

[Ignostic?]

because one thermometer is all they rely on, forget the millions of others.

as for snowed out of a conference, your assumption is that global warming has no snow.

Not millions, just thousands. That's a ridiculously low resolution for the accuracy required for their claims. The living room of a typical house would require dozens of thermometers placed throughout it to be able to measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree accuracy. It's simply impossible for science to currently measure the Earth's average temperature to the accuracy required for their claims, let alone the historical data they are comparing it to.

 

[Carson]

Here is some food for thought on global warming.

The Hockey Stick vs. Ice Core Data


Found it here;

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100019671/climategate-the-video-everyone-should-see/

 

[Keith and stuff]

It's Global Cooling!!! er wait... It's Global Warming!!! no um.... It's Climate Change!!! dang it..... no, It's Global Climate Disruption! Yeah that's what it is! Now pay your fair share!

People seeking power will say whatever they can to get power. Make stuff up... take advantage of sad situations... take advantage of good things... smear good people. People want stuff and they will stop at nothing to get it.

 

[PRB]

Not millions, just thousands. That's a ridiculously low resolution for the accuracy required for their claims. The living room of a typical house would require dozens of thermometers placed throughout it to be able to measure the temperature to a tenth of a degree accuracy. It's simply impossible for science to currently measure the Earth's average temperature to the accuracy required for their claims, let alone the historical data they are comparing it to.

therefore you expect future temperature to be higher or lower than scientists are predicting? or is it completely coin toss for you and you're prepared for all cases?

 

[PRB]

Here is some food for thought on global warming.

The Hockey Stick vs. Ice Core Data


Found it here;

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...71/climategate-the-video-everyone-should-see/

Comparing it to the past from anything over 100 years is pointless, since we didn't have the fragile lifestyle back then. Hurricane Sandy and Katrina didn't destroy civilization, it didn't kill all of Americans, it didn't even destroy the people's lives forever, not even those in the city. But does that mean it was nothing and nothing worth preparing for?

Nobody is saying global warming will destroy our way of life, but is that all you're concerned about? Hypocritically, you post graphs in your signature comparing dollar value to the past, as if you'd be willing to live the lifestyle of the past.

 

[PRB]

People seeking power will say whatever they can to get power. Make stuff up... take advantage of sad situations... take advantage of good things... smear good people. People want stuff and they will stop at nothing to get it.

so to think they need to make stuff up is assuming an overkill and convuluted conspiracy.

 

[PRB]

It's Global Cooling!!! er wait... It's Global Warming!!! no um.... It's Climate Change!!! dang it..... no, It's Global Climate Disruption! Yeah that's what it is! Now pay your fair share!

What does IPCC stand for? that's how long the phrase has been used. So you can stop with the baseless claim that "they" first claim cooling, then warming, then climate change, it's just not true.

 

[Antischism]

People here should bookmark this site and read through it: http://www.skepticalscience.com/

A lot of the arguments against anthropogenic climate change are addressed and there is a comment section for each issue for further reading/clarification.

 

[PRB]

People here should bookmark this site and read through it: http://www.skepticalscience.com/

A lot of the arguments against anthropogenic climate change are addressed and there is a comment section for each issue for further reading/clarification.

inb4 somebody dismisses it as state funded alarmist propaganda

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Just because governments use global warming as an excuse to create new laws does not mean it is a hoax. The government often uses children as an excuse to create laws, but I am pretty sure children exist.

It actually kinda does. That's a false equivocation fallacy.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Finally somebody understands this *sigh*

9/11 must've never happened if the government is using it as an excuse to attack Iraq.

False equivocation.

You can't compare a real, tangible event, something that doesn't need reports to be proven, with a complicated theory involving myriad data points that nobody can directly observe. Where there is an agenda, you can bet the government is lying to you. Just because the actual event of 9/11 actually happened, that doesn't mean the facts surrounding it are not shrouded in secrecy. Something like global warming, however, doesn't need to actually happen to elicit a fear response from the people.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

"are all government funded research gone to the wrong conclusions?It's pretty safe to say... yes."

You don't know. Surprise!

Your point?

 

[PaulConventionWV]

inb4 somebody dismisses it as state funded alarmist propaganda

No, just sheeple propaganda. Scientists on something called skepticalscience.com? Nah, I've seen the science whores before and their language. They love the word "skeptic" and use it profusely, not to mention the word "science." I doubt there is a single scientist on that website. Just a bunch of faux "enlightened" know-it-alls.

 

[PRB]

Your point?

you make a bold claim that "it's safe to say all" but then when I ask you, you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[PRB]

No, just sheeple propaganda. Scientists on something called skepticalscience.com? Nah, I've seen the science whores before and their language. They love the word "skeptic" and use it profusely, not to mention the word "science." I doubt there is a single scientist on that website. Just a bunch of faux "enlightened" know-it-alls.

the scientists don't need to be "on the site" but several scientists are actually cited. who is this site's "faux enlightened" any different than the conspiracy theorist sites you read and trust?

 

[Antischism]

No, just sheeple propaganda. Scientists on something called skepticalscience.com? Nah, I've seen the science whores before and their language. They love the word "skeptic" and use it profusely, not to mention the word "science." I doubt there is a single scientist on that website. Just a bunch of faux "enlightened" know-it-alls.

You should probably look through the site if that's your assumption. They base everything off of extensively researched, peer reviewed science papers. Whether you choose to ignore scientific consensus or not is your choice, though. The research is there and cited, then explained. There is also a section for comments where people can ask questions, which is also helpful if you want to read through it.