The problem with this is that apparently in a lot of states, in order for write in votes to be counted, the person written is has to have qualified for/registered as a write-in candidate.
And I think in some places, if someone declares they are a write in candidate, they have to pay the fees the same as those who are on the ballot.
Some states even have really obscure laws that make it almost impossible for write in votes to be counted. For example, in Pennsylvania (I think), in order for someone to receive the credit as a write-in, you must write the names of all 21 delegates in that little space.
I've just become aware of this recently when I read a couple of things that really sounded wrong. One of them was about declared write-in candidates having to pay fees just like those who are on the ballot. The other was when I read about the libertarian caucuses(?) in Missouri and California. A write in candidate received more votes than anyone who was running as a libertarian. Presumably, it was Ron Paul. But those votes were counted as "Uncommitted" (Presumably because he had not 'qualified' as a write-in candidate.)
I researched this on google. And I think the outlook is bleak, for any type of write-in effort. Or, at least, that is my impression. But I'm not satisfied, even now, that I found enough info to give a comprehensive picture of how it works, or of what states you have to pay to get on the ballot .
And these problems don't even take into account the obstacles to writing in a candidate when you aren't using paper ballots.
I think the whole thing is atrocious, though. Writing in someone should always be an option. And there shouldn't be so many obstacles to that.
