Wow Andrew Jackson Nails IT!

s35wf

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
1,048
I just read Andrew Jackson's farewell address to the nation. I never paid much attention to history in school, so im catching up on my own now. Besides I dont think/remember being taught much about Jackson while in school..... anyways after reading this i cant believe how he hits everything that is currently happening today within our banking system. amazing. EVERYONE NEEDS to READ This!

Link Here:
http://www.reformation.org/jackson_farewell_message.html
 
Damn shame that his wisdom didn't sink into the general consciousness well enough to stick. :( It's such a beautiful piece, and should be in every kid's history book.
 
Last edited:
The States which had so long been retarded in their improvement by the Indian tribes residing in the midst of them are at length relieved from the evil, and this unhappy race--the original dwellers in our land--are now placed in a situation where we may well hope that they will share in the blessings of civilization and be saved from that degradation and destruction to which they were rapidly' hastening while they remained in the States; and while the safety and comfort of our own citizens have been greatly promoted by their removal, the philanthropist will rejoice that the remnant of that ill-fated race has been at length placed beyond the reach of injury or oppression, and that the paternal care of the General Government will hereafter watch over them and protect the

interesting
 
We're engaged in a timeless struggle. Individual freedom versus elitist dictat. Our ancestors fought this same fight, but sadly their wisdom and admonitions have been erased from the public consciousness by the passage of time. If Jackson were to give this farewell speech today no doubt the Hannitys and Limbaughs and Moyers of the world would unite in calling him a crackpot.

Reading this speech makes me very sad, and just reinforces my fond desire to dig up and desecrate Woodrow Wilson's corpse.

edit: Isn't it ironic that Jackson's portrait graces the very paper fiat money that he opposed his entire life? Wtf is that? Is that like a final parting insult from the banksters?
 
Last edited:
omfg dun lissen to diz rasist lyk omfg diden yall lern bout duh trale of teerz?!?!?!?!!?11
 
Another funny thing about Jackson is that many native American activists groups want his portrait off the $20, because they don't like seeing his racist genocidal face on their money. What's hilarious is that Jackson probably wouldn't want his face on that fake-ass currency either.
 
It's an awesome thing to read.

Excerpt
"The paper system being founded on public confidence and having of itself no intrinsic value, it is liable to great and sudden fluctuations, thereby rendering property insecure and the wages of labor unsteady and uncertain. The corporations which create the paper money can not be relied upon to keep the circulating medium uniform in amount. In times of prosperity, when confidence is high, they are tempted by the prospect of gain or by the influence of those who hope to profit by it to extend their issues of paper beyond the bounds of discretion and the reasonable demands of business; and when these issues have been pushed on from day to day, until public confidence is at length shaken, then a reaction takes place, and they immediately withdraw the credits they have given, suddenly curtail their issues, and produce an unexpected and ruinous contraction of the circulating medium, which is felt by the whole community. The banks by this means save themselves, and the mischievous consequences of their imprudence or cupidity are visited upon the public. Nor does the evil stop here. These ebbs and flows in the currency and these indiscreet extensions of credit naturally engender a spirit of speculation injurious to the habits and character of the people. We have already seen its effects in the wild spirit of speculation in the public lands and various kinds of stock which within the last year or two seized upon such a multitude of our citizens and threatened to pervade all classes of society and to withdraw their attention from the sober pursuits of honest industry. It is not by encouraging this spirit that we shall best preserve public virtue and promote the true interests of our country; but if your currency continues as exclusively paper as it now is, it will foster this eager desire to amass wealth without labor; it will multiply the number of dependents on bank accommodations and bank favors; the temptation to obtain money at any sacrifice will become stronger and stronger, and inevitably lead to corruption, which will find its way into your public councils and destroy at no distant day the purity of your Government."
 
Another funny thing about Jackson is that many native American activists groups want his portrait off the $20, because they don't like seeing his racist genocidal face on their money. What's hilarious is that Jackson probably wouldn't want his face on that fake-ass currency either.

According to Wikipedia:

Jackson first appeared on the twenty dollar bill in 1928. It is not clear the reason the bill was switched from Grover Cleveland to Andrew Jackson. According to the U.S. Treasury, "Treasury Department records do not reveal the reason that portraits of these particular statesmen were chosen in preference to those of other persons of equal importance and prominence."[3] The placement of Jackson on the $20 bill may be a historical irony; as president, he vehemently opposed both the National Bank and paper money and made the goal of his administration the destruction of the National Bank.[4][5] In his farewell address to the nation, he cautioned the public about paper money.​
 
Another funny thing about Jackson is that many native American activists groups want his portrait off the $20, because they don't like seeing his racist genocidal face on their money. What's hilarious is that Jackson probably wouldn't want his face on that fake-ass currency either.

It's a fucking disgrace that Jackson and Jefferson are printed on paper money. They must be turning over in their graves with today's state of affairs.
 
Thank you for sharing the Jackson Farewell Address.

You may appreciate this excerpt of a letter from Thomas Jefferson (Letter to James Monroe, January 1, 1815) - It appears as though we are going to have to repeat this mistake at least once more.

“If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied. The issuing power of money should be taken from the bankers and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies.

We are completely saddled and bridled, and the bank is so firmly mounted on us that we must go where they ill guide.

The dominion which the banking institutions have obtained over the minds of our citizens...must be broken, or it will break us.”


Adam L Tucker
just3ants
 
I have been honoring jackson on my frn by writing next to him "I killed the Bank" and then on the back promoting the endthefed.us site :)
 
+1
There is, perhaps, no one of the powers conferred on the Federal Government so liable to abuse as the taxing power. The most productive and convenient sources of revenue were necessarily given to it, that it might be able to perform the important duties imposed upon it; and the taxes which it lays upon commerce being concealed from the real payer in the price of the article, they do not so readily attract the attention of the people as smaller sums demanded from them directly by the taxgatherer. But the tax imposed on goods enhances by so much the price of the commodity to the consumer, and as many of these duties are imposed on articles of necessity which are daily used by the great body of the people, the money raised by these imposts is drawn from their pockets. Congress has no right under the Constitution to take money from the people unless it is required to execute some one of the specific powers intrusted to the Government; and if they raise more than is necessary for such purposes, it is an abuse of the power of taxation, and unjust and oppressive. It may indeed happen that the revenue will sometimes exceed the amount anticipated when the taxes were laid. When, however, this is ascertained, it is easy to reduce them, and in such a case it is unquestionably the duty of the Government to reduce them, for no circumstances can justify it in assuming a power not given to it by the Constitution nor in taking away the money of the people when it is not needed for the legitimate wants of the Government.
 
The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson — and I am not wholly excepting the Administration of W.W. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States — only on a far bigger and broader basis.
Letter to Col. Edward Mandell House (21 November 1933); as quoted in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945, edited by Elliott Roosevelt (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1950), pg. 373.
 
But in order to maintain the Union unimpaired it is absolutely necessary that the laws passed by the constituted authorities should be faithfully executed in every part of the country, and that every good citizen should at all times stand ready to put down, with the combined force of the nation, every attempt at unlawful resistance, under whatever pretext it may be made or whatever shape it may assume. Unconstitutional or oppressive laws may no doubt be passed by Congress, either from erroneous views or the want of due consideration; if they are within the reach of judicial authority, the remedy is easy and peaceful; and if, from the character of the law, it is an abuse of power not within the control of the judiciary, then free discussion and calm appeals to reason and to the justice of the people will not fail to redress the wrong. But until the law shall be declared void by the courts or repealed by Congress no individual or combination of individuals can be justified in forcibly resisting its execution. It is impossible that any government can continue to exist upon any other principles. It would cease to be a government and be unworthy of the name if it had not the power to enforce the execution of its own laws within its own sphere of action.

It's too bad that the SCOTUS can no longer be trusted to reign in the other branches when they exceed their Constitutional authority, as Jackson apparently assumed would be the case.
 
It's too bad that the SCOTUS can no longer be trusted to reign in the other branches when they exceed their Constitutional authority, as Jackson apparently assumed would be the case.

'Lysander Spooner once said that he believed "that by false interpretations, and naked usurpations, the government has been made in practice a very widely, and almost wholly, different thing from what the Constitution itself purports to authorize." At the same time, he could not exonerate the Constitution, for it "has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." It is hard to argue with that.' -- Thomas E. Woods Jr
 
It's too bad that the SCOTUS can no longer be trusted to reign in the other branches when they exceed their Constitutional authority, as Jackson apparently assumed would be the case.

Right. For this reason, the only real remedy short of returning to something similar to the Articles of Confederation is secession as the various branches of government at the federal level have conspired to usurp the power of the states and their respective peoples.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top