I don't think you can dismiss such a notion as simply "establishment politicking". Clearly someone such as the OP, who has been on these boards since '07 and has 3,000 posts under their belt, is not likely an establishment hack. This is a genuine question based in pragmatism, even if it's misguided. It would not even be close to the ideal scenario, but it is not out of the realm of possibility.
That said, I do not believe that Ron would ever choose Mitt, but if he did, I would still vote for him. Like I said, I just hope he hires amazing security, if that ends up being the case.
No, you misunderstand. I am not saying anyone that posts this question is establishment. I am saying the meme was created by the establishment, and started showing up in various establishment media sources. That is where the meme is coming from, and as memes do, it spreads, and so people here start talking about it. Some here are plants, I'm sure. Others are full on Ron Paul supporters who are sincerely curious.
This is an extremely common, and extremely well known, manipulation tactic. It's often called 'floating an idea'. It's a common method of vetting options on controversial subjects. You have a few outlier articles float an idea, like a Paul/Romney ticket, or a Romney/Rand ticket, and you gauge reception to the idea. It's such a odd concept, that people start talking about it. Wondering about it. Discussing it. It's like a seed; you plant the idea, and watch it spread. And suddenly a ridiculous concept, like Paul actually accepting Romney as VP, become an option on the table, which is the goal of floating an idea. And here we are, discussing the ultimate compromise, putting Romney in second in line, and acting like it's a good thing despite obvious examples in history, like Kennedy, as to why this is an absolutely unacceptable option.
It's really no different than how you spread any meme -- like how articles and comment sections commonly refer to Paul supporters as being rude, or young, or druggies. Common sense and even a bit of reading of comment sections disprove this; it is the anti-Paul commenters that hurl insults, and most Paul respondents write eloquent rebuttals, or simply 'Ron Paul 2012!'. Yet, this meme that we're rude sticks... even in the face of empirical evidence that anyone can find in the comment section to any article.