bump... Conza, did you figure this out?
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.CNN doctored the image. That's my analysis anyway.
Re-Edit: Yeah, I can't see any other way.. according to the times.. where if it was natural, you'd be looking at thread 1; thread 2; thread 3; thread 4... all containing posting times pretty closely, before a time that would bump the thread above another.
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.
It is mildly interesting, however, that forsmant said yesterday that there was a moment when they did line up that way.
Here yah go:
![]()
something tells me dr.'d.
Haven't bothered yet. Busy.
I think someone else said they did in another thread... said it didn't line up.
I guess they could have editted the image.
Edit:
Ok it doesn't make any sense... in order to get:
Going off the pics... the bump would have occurred in the 3rd page for: who are you voting for? That leaves; 04:28 AM, 04:29 AM, 04:41 AM.
This is the starting blocs. Now one of these posts has to have come BEFORE the thread; which is below it -- "Let's Stop Overreacting about Barr!"
Except; it was CREATED @ 04:58 AM....Haha... so it's impossible for a thread whose last post is at 4.41am.... to be AHEAD of a thread CREATED at 4.58am....
CNN doctored the image. That's my analysis anyway.
Re-Edit: Yeah, I can't see any other way.. according to the times.. where if it was natural, you'd be looking at thread 1; thread 2; thread 3; thread 4... all containing posting times pretty closely, before a time that would bump the thread above another.
What I think is funny about this is how Abbi presented RPFs in such a way that one should naturally know about the forum.![]()
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.
something tells me dr.'d.
You guys are good! I never would have thought that in a million years. I am so completely gullible and skeptical at the same timebrandonyates said:Yea, clearly the whole thing was photoshopped together. Check out the vertical lines....
Does it matter if it was photoshopped or not?
The threads existed and were given attention. Nothing was taken out of context.
Now, if they changed the wording of the title to "Let's get gay with Barr and rape aliens"...