I can't remember what debate it was, but I lost all respect for Ron Paul when he kept referring to POC as "the blacks." Not just once but many times. "The blacks" this..."The blacks" that... He sounded like a crazy racist uncle after too many drinks.
Wait... RP wants to disallow the USSC from ruling on the constitutionality of laws? Wow, that disbands the Union and takes us right back to a confederate style of government.
Let us be clear: Ron Paul has no chance AT ALL of getting the GOP nomination. None.
Let's just be very thankful for this fact, as well as being thankful for the fact that all the unreconstructed confederates among us have, historically, lost, and lost, and lost again.
Ron Paul is opposed to a separation of church & state.
While my sister and I were standing outside at 3:30 am on Black Friday (don't ask), we had 2 people going down the line handing out Ron Paul pamphlets. I took one look at it and handed it back saying "no thank you"- to which one of the supporters says to me in a loud voice "what, you support illegal immigration?" My sister looked at me with a oh crap look and I said to him "my political opinions ar none of your business especially at 3:30 in the morning so have a good holiday season." His friend pulled him on down the line and the people around me started laughing- then when the tool came back past me in line, he says again "anyone who is against illegal immigration should vote for Ron Paul." And I just said "and anyone who supports a woman's right to choose will vote against him." And got a ton of applause from the women around me. I was just so freakin' irritated with that guy. I mean, come one- if you're going to support someone, that's fine but don't make it all about 1 issue and don't bother me when I am standing in line in 30 degree weather waiting to try to grab a cheap KitchenAid mixer for my MIL.
I am not a Libertarian. I believe in government. I think Government is Good. Frankly, I don't know why anyone who thinks government is bad wants a job in government. That would be like me trying to get a job at Dow Chemical, or within the Republican party, for that matter.
But (and this is a big but) I understand the principles behind Libertarianism. Basically, it's like, "Leave me alone to make my own decisions". So how can someone claim to be a Libertarian, and want to take away women's legal choices? I don't get it.
My postition on Ron Paul is very simple. Ron Paul does not believe that my family should have the right to exist, or the same access to services as other families (health insurance,employment,housing,etc.) Therefore Ron Paul can't possibly get my vote.
I really don't get why any poor/working class people could support him also, since he believes in less social services and more breaks for big corporations who don't want to invest here anyway-so no safety net AND no increase in Jobs or Wages.
Not only that, but the "Gold Standard" is just silly. Gold is no more "real" in value than paper money. Just like paper money, gold only has special value because we believe it to have value. It could just as easily be the "Sand Standard" or the "Salt Standard".
To really understand this, read two books: Gulliver's Travels (pay special attention to the section with the Whinnams and the giant diamonds) and The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. When you are done, do some research about Oz's author, L. Frank Baum, and get the backstory on what he was really writing about.
My apologies if this has been mentioned, but I would like to suggest you read the article titled "The Ron Paul Campaign and its Neo-Nazi Supporters" in the November 14, 2007 edition of American Thinker dot com. It is quite eye opening.
A bit OT but there is some interesting information in there about Cindy Sheehan too.
I just printed the above referenced book. Ugh.
He spouts off about how unfair it is that blacks and hispanics can have civil rights groups and a caucus, but whites can't without being called racist. And so far I'm only on the 3nd page of chapter 1.
Well, the problem is that many states would opt to curtail citizens rights if given the power. This doesn't just apply to abortion rights, but other civil liberties, including those based on race and gender.
Ron Paul would leave it to the states to decide if blacks and whites could marry. After all, that's not in the constitution.
While I am 100% against the Iraq War, I am also opposed to Ron Paul's "let the Iraqis deal with the mess we made of their country" plan. It simply isn't realistic (or fair) for every single US soldier to be out of Iraq that day after the election. Or rather, it's about as realistic as returning to the gold standard.
The source is lewrockwell . com, which is a site that makes no bones about its appreciation for the Confederacy. And considers Abraham Lincoln virtually a criminal.
He still believes that having access to health care isn't every human being's right.. I can't understand why THAT alone isn't enough to make any compassionate person realize he is bad news. He supports raw milk farmers? Groovy enough. He still rather you die in a gutter than use taxes to fund health care.
Tax deductions will not make healthcare affordable for me. I already pay no taxes and get the EIC (which he opposes). He does nothing for me in regards to healthcare, and there are many others out there just like me. What are we supposed to do, just go without? Oh wait, that's what we are doing.
Well, it may not be his "idea" that people go without, but it may very be the reality that comes from his plan.
I mean, I think it's terrific that the administered to folks who couldn't pay, but how many doctors actually do that?? Many won't even take cash. Why would that suddenly change?
So I say, "Yay" for raw milk, but the "cost" of that elsewhere (like less medical care and social programs) just are NOT worth it to me.
Most doctors will laugh in your face if you ask them to make payment arrangements. And pro bono? Dream on!
Direct quotes from other women who oppose Ron Paul from three very different high volume all women message boards:
ROFL!!! I love the way men think they know what women want!!
Huh?! I'm a feminist and am 100% for Dr. P. While I disagree on a couple of issues, those pale in comparison to the major ones.Well, the fact that you are unusual is just what this thread was begun to discuss. Thus the discussion of feminism, which is the prevailing ideology, and is hostile (to say the least) to what Dr. Paul represents.
Gee, I spent something like half an hour composing a lengthy commentary on numerous posts, which I thought was "thoughtful", some of it perhaps provocative (I like a good discussion), and this is all the response you're willing to offer?
Huh?! I'm a feminist and am 100% for Dr. P. While I disagree on a couple of issues, those pale in comparison to the major ones.
after this post. Any person on here who degrades someone for their race, gender, sexual orientation, age will be put on ignore.
please ignore me, i have super secret information i need to tell men about and i don't want the women to know it.
please ignore me, i have super secret information i need to tell men about and i don't want the women to know it.
Huh?! I'm a feminist and am 100% for Dr. P. While I disagree on a couple of issues, those pale in comparison to the major ones.
"Feminism" means so many different things that it appears to mean very little. Its theoretical advocates constantly contradict each other and themselves. Rather than damaging feminism, its incoherence offers an easy defense against all criticism: whatever the complaint, the response is that it misses the mark because feminism is really something else.
Direct quotes from other women who oppose Ron Paul from three very different high volume all women message boards:
Another problem, all the woman bashing going on. There are females here. Do you want to drive them away? Do you want the new female on board to say....hmmm nevermind?