Wisconsin meltdown puts Trump on track for convention fight

On April 01, 2017

The Stupid Party finally exclaims,

"Wow, we could have supported Trump, instead we've got BOTH Clinton's back in the White House."


Since Trump believe that the US economy does better under the democrats especially Clinton, maybe this is not a bad thing after all. Trump get her best pals into the white house and the US economy booms.
 
That would leave Trump with a good majority of delegates even if not enough to clinch. With that large of a lead, it would be difficult to deny him the nomination.

If all those went to Cruz it would be:
Cruz: 1109 delegates
Trump: 1236 delegates

The more going to Kasich, the bigger the lead by Trump.

The degree of plurality does not matter . . .Trump goes down after only a plurality first ballot "win" and would never get a majority later then.

Team Rubio asks MN GOP to not "release" delegates -- yet
http://examinergazette.com/2016/04/03/team-rubio-asks-mn-gop-to-not-release-delegates-yet.html
 
Last edited:
That would leave Trump with a good majority of delegates even if not enough to clinch. With that large of a lead, it would be difficult to deny him the nomination.

If all those went to Cruz it would be:
Cruz: 1109 delegates
Trump: 1236 delegates

The more going to Kasich, the bigger the lead by Trump. Kasich, for example, is currently polling #2 in New York.

Trump cannot clinch without a majority, he cannot have a "good majority" and not clinch. No one can win the nomination without a majority of the delegate votes.
 
Last edited:
Trump cannot clinch without a majority, he cannot have a "good majority" and not clinch. No one can win the nomination without a majority of the delegate votes.

One can have a majority of delegate votes but still lack enough to "clinch" the nomination. By definition, nobody can "clinch" without a majority. It will be tough to say that the guy with the most delegates does not deserve to be the nominee.
 
One can have a majority of delegate votes but still lack enough to "clinch" the nomination. By definition, nobody can "clinch" without a majority. It will be tough to say that the guy with the most delegates does not deserve to be the nominee.

Respectfully, the above makes no sense.

A plurality is different than a majority.

By the rules, any majority (50% of the delegates, plus one; or more) clinches the nomination.

There is no such thing as "a majority that does not clinch" as you assert.

Your statement
One can have a majority of delegate votes but still lack enough to "clinch" the nomination.
is flat-out wrong.
 
Oooh the drama! This election season really is shaping to be the best one ever!
 
One can have a majority of delegate votes but still lack enough to "clinch" the nomination. By definition, nobody can "clinch" without a majority. It will be tough to say that the guy with the most delegates does not deserve to be the nominee.

No it won't. the majority is the rule, and Reince Priebus maintains that will not be relaxed to accommodate Trump.
 
No it won't. the majority is the rule, and Reince Priebus maintains that will not be relaxed to accommodate Trump.

It doesn't have to be relaxed in that circumstance, which I don't think is what will be occurring.

Cruz hasn't won enough states to be nominated, and he's not even eligible to be president.
 
It doesn't have to be relaxed in that circumstance, which I don't think is what will be occurring.

Cruz hasn't won enough states to be nominated, and he's not even eligible to be president.

Rule 40b doesn't have anything about "winning" 8 states. They just need a majority of 8 delegations to sign their state's petition.
 
It doesn't have to be relaxed in that circumstance, which I don't think is what will be occurring.

Cruz hasn't won enough states to be nominated, and he's not even eligible to be president.

So far, every court that has ruled on a challenge to Cruz's eligibility has said he is. I don't expect that will change when he becomes the nominee.
 
So far, every court that has ruled on a challenge to Cruz's eligibility has said he is. I don't expect that will change when he becomes the nominee.

You have just read the headlines, not the actual cases.
 
New York and Illinois cases were dismissed on technicalities- not the merits of the case. Pennsylvania did rule that he was eligible.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/03/11...at-ted-cruz-is-eligible-to-run-for-president/

A Pennsylvania judge has rejected an effort to kick Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz off the state primary ballot, ruling that the Texas senator’s birth outside of the United States doesn’t disqualify him from the ballot under the U.S. Constitution.

The ruling is the latest legal victory for Mr. Cruz on the eligibility question. So-called “birther” suits have been filed in other states, including New York and Illinois. The cases in those two states were dismissed on technical grounds.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution says a president must be a “natural born Citizen.” Mr. Cruz has been a citizen from birth because his mother was one. The question is whether his birthplace, a hospital in Calgary, makes him a “natural born citizen,” a term undefined in the Constitution and by the Supreme Court.

Unlike the suits filed against Mr. Cruz in other states, the case in Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court resulted in a ruling on the underlying constitutional question. The judge, citing various legal scholars, agreed with Mr. Cruz that he’s eligible to run.

“Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a ‘natural born citizen’ includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth,” wrote Judge Dan Pellegrini in a written opinion issued after denied the petition at a hearing Thursday.

Elliott then appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court, which issued an order Thursday denying his appeal.

At least six other lawsuits against Cruz have been dismissed, though federal cases are pending in Texas and Alabama. Most of the cases that have been tossed so far have been dismissed on procedural grounds, excepting Elliott’s original lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
Oooh the drama! This election season really is shaping to be the best one ever!

YES,

RPF knows words, it has the best words, the best words for this election, but there is not a better word than circus.

Now, please pass me the bread.
 
Back
Top