Pauliana: Yes, and when someone sees the light and changes their positions, we should never forgive them and never invite them into the tent.
brandonyates: There is a HUGE difference between "forgive them and invite them into the tent." and appointing them leader of the movement before they have even demostrated their change is sincere.
You guys are talking about forgiveness, but you ignore the
Libertarian principle of repentance and forgiveness that is much different (and better) than the Christian idea of forgiveness.
With Christian forgiveness, person A murders or robs person B, and for some reason some other guy (e.g. God) does the forgiving and person B (or his family in the case of a murdered victim) are not consulted on the matter and are never given a chance to be made whole.
But with
Libertarian repentance and forgiveness, person A is required to repent directly to his victim (person B) and offer to compensate his victim for damages he caused. Then it is up to person B to do any forgiving--should there be any forgiving.
So, its not up to us voters and Ron Paul activists to forgive Bob Barr. That's a decision for all of Barr's victims in the American Gulag and places like Falluja, Iraq whom Bob "The Surge is Working" Barr had a direct hand in victimizing.
I think if Barr is truly repentant for his past crimes, this could be a great opportunity to promote libertarianism. The kind of personal responsibility and repentance that
libertarianism requires from Bob Barr, is the same kind of repentance that
libertarianism requires from our whole violent, statist society.
I think this point can be made far better by a "sinner" like Bob Barr than a "saint" like Ron Paul.
By the way, I've got blood on my hands. I voted for George Wallace and his genocidal Veep Curtis "Bomb-em-back-to-the-Stone-Age" LeMay in 1968 in my 5th grade class. If a VietNamese person accused me of indirectly participating in the napalming of his family and asked me to compensate him for his losses, I would be forced to agree with him.