Will Tom Davis be Ron Paul's successor?

Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
590
He's pushing Mises Institute lectures on his facebook, he's stood up for Ron Paul through think and thin, he's a dynamic speaker, he's popular, he's young, he's a believer in non-interventionism, he doesn't bend to popular opinion...

Will Tom Davis emerge as Ron Paul's successor as Ron gets older over the next ten years?
 
I'm hoping he will be a Mark Sanford or Jim DeMint successor, which will make him a contender for the Presidency in the future.

He is an awesome liberty candidate. I trust him.
 
I'm hoping he will be a Mark Sanford or Jim DeMint successor, which will make him a contender for the Presidency in the future.

He is an awesome liberty candidate. I trust him.

I will vote for him if we still have the right to vote by then.
 
I will accept no fewer than four Ron Paul successors.
Preferably a dozen or more.
 
Well, let's not talk about Dr. Paul like he's out of the picture. It's bad juju.
 
I think he's probably gearing up to primary Mrs. Linsdey Graham in 2013/2014. The Ron Paul wing of the party will be his strongest ally in the battle now that he's one of us, and it will probably shape up to be an epic establishment vs outsider battle ala Paul Vs Grayson.

Just my wild guess. :)
 
I'm hoping he will be a Mark Sanford or Jim DeMint successor, which will make him a contender for the Presidency in the future.

He is an awesome liberty candidate. I trust him.

The GOP is shifting. By the next election a Ron Paul candidate including one who agrees with Dr. Paul on foreign policy will in first place. I was listening to a talk show host who has been decidedly unfriendly to Dr. Paul over the years. He gave a very fair and positive analysis of Ron Paul's post SC speech. He added that Ron Paul was right to say the momentum was going the way of our movement. He just didn't think that momentum was enough to win him the presidency this go round. But that means that someone that this movement could trust could carry the day in 2016. I think that person is Rand, although some here don't trust Rand precisely because they see him as the "Jim DeMint" type.
 
The GOP is shifting. By the next election a Ron Paul candidate including one who agrees with Dr. Paul on foreign policy will in first place. I was listening to a talk show host who has been decidedly unfriendly to Dr. Paul over the years. He gave a very fair and positive analysis of Ron Paul's post SC speech. He added that Ron Paul was right to say the momentum was going the way of our movement. He just didn't think that momentum was enough to win him the presidency this go round. But that means that someone that this movement could trust could carry the day in 2016. I think that person is Rand, although some here don't trust Rand precisely because they see him as the "Jim DeMint" type.

I see Rand as distancing himself from Ron's foreign policy, as all other liberty candidates are. I won't get enthusiastic about another candidate unless they own Ron's foreign policy and wear it proudly. It's hard to support a politician unless they have (figurative) balls.
 
Will Tom Davis emerge as Ron Paul's successor as Ron gets older over the next ten years?
His participation in the Mises Academy is a very good sign. I hope he keeps it up. If he does, I have no doubt that the rEVOLution will have his back.

However, you should say "as one of Ron Paul's successors" - don't forget Glen Bradley, Justin Amash & Rand Paul!

And I hope we can add Karen Kwiatkowski & Thomas Massie to that list soon.
 
I see Rand as distancing himself from Ron's foreign policy, as all other liberty candidates are. I won't get enthusiastic about another candidate unless they own Ron's foreign policy and wear it proudly. It's hard to support a politician unless they have (figurative) balls.
Do you think Rand could've won in KY if he had done that?
 
Back
Top