WikiLeaks releases draft of highly-secretive multi-national trade deal

Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
16,463
No wonder they kept it secret. What a malicious piece of US corporate lobbying. TPP is about world domination for US corporations. Nothing else. We will stop this madness in New Zealand,” he told RT’s Andrew Blake.
According to WikiLeaks, the Obama administration and senior heads of state from other potential TPP nations have expressed interest in ratifying the agreement before 2014.

http://rt.com/usa/wikileaks-tpp-ip-dotcom-670/
 
This is disturbing and is BIG news! People better start paying attention!!
 



Stop the Free Trade Agenda

STOP FREE TRADE AGENDA is a major new action project of The John Birch Society with the purpose of preserving our personal freedoms and national independence by stopping congressional approval of any new multilateral free trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). A vote to approve the TPP agreement is expected in late 2013; a vote on the TTIP agreement is expected in 2015. The global power elites view multilateral free trade agreements as one of their main vehicles for establishing, step by step, socialistic regional governments controlled by themselves as steppingstones toward a socialistic global government under the United Nations.




How the Free Trade Agenda Is Knocking Down America -- The New American (PDF) Special Report
http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/TNA2917.pdf


September 2, 2013


The Special Report includes the following articles:

- The "Free Trade" Agenda Threatens Our Rights
- Global Merger: Piece by Piece
- The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty
- Trade Promises... and Trade Reality
- North American Union: From NAFTA to the NAU
- Fast-track: Enabler of the "Free Trade" Agenda
- Regional Scheme for the Pacific Rim
- EU/U.S. — Transatlantic Convergence
- Preserve Your Rights: Stop the "Free Trade" Agenda


Tools to STOP the "Free Trade" Agenda - Pamphlet, Reprints, CDs, TNA Special Issues
https://www.jbs.org/shop-jbs/stop-the-free-trade-agenda


Facebook:

Choose Freedom - STOP the Free Trade Agenda
 
Support Freedom, stop free trade! Yeah, makes total sense!

Just think about PATRIOT and other government agendas that are just the opposite of what their name implies.
Now think about stopping that agenda

Now does that make more sense?
 
Just think about PATRIOT and other government agendas that are just the opposite of what their name implies.
Now think about stopping that agenda

Now does that make more sense?
A little, but sometimes I'm not sure what people are opposing. Is the message "Support free trade, but stop the free trade agenda because it's not real free trade" and "Patriots oppose USA PATRIOT Act" or "Oppose free trade, and free trade agenda" and "Unpatriotic and proud of it"?
 
Yes, Ron Paul Opposes "Free Trade" Agreements


Ron Paul: Oppose Free Trade Agreements



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFLRuMHAK_w

Ron Paul says Free Trade Agreements erode National sovereignty, destroy jobs, and only serves the special interests. So-called "Free Trade" is Government-managed trade.



Henry Kissinger: NAFTA, the Architecture for the New World Order



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKKwZl1BTxk

Henry Kissinger: NAFTA -- it will represent the most creative step towards a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the cold war. The revolution sweeping the Western hemisphere points to an international order based on cooperation. It is this revolution that is at stake in the ratification of NAFTA. What congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement, but the Architecture of a new international system - Los Angeles Times, 1993
 
NY Times Endorses the TPP's Corporate Coup d'état ...

Abby Martin talks about the New York Times' bizarre endorsement of the Trans Pacific Partnership, a multi-nation trade deal that is being negotiated by corporations behind closed doors and kept secret from the public.

 
NY Times Endorses the TPP's Corporate Coup d'état ...

Abby Martin talks about the New York Times' bizarre endorsement of the Trans Pacific Partnership, a multi-nation trade deal that is being negotiated by corporations behind closed doors and kept secret from the public.



Abby Martin hates profits! <s>
 
A little, but sometimes I'm not sure what people are opposing. Is the message "Support free trade, but stop the free trade agenda because it's not real free trade" and "Patriots oppose USA PATRIOT Act" or "Oppose free trade, and free trade agenda" and "Unpatriotic and proud of it"?
Yeah, I think you've got it. :)
 
Indeed. This news really warrants people to pay attention.

I've been warning about this since 2012.


2poeff6.jpg



Beware the Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Pact


John Birch Society
Nov. 15, 2012
 
A little, but sometimes I'm not sure what people are opposing. Is the message "Support free trade, but stop the free trade agenda because it's not real free trade" and "Patriots oppose USA PATRIOT Act" or "Oppose free trade, and free trade agenda" and "Unpatriotic and proud of it"?

Ron Paul calls "Free Trade" agreements by their actual name: "Government-Managed Trade" agreements.
 
Can this meme, intellectual property, ever be altered back to state enforced monopoly. How can a non-existent entity be created out of nothing and become part of the vernacular? There is no IP.
 
Can this meme, intellectual property, ever be altered back to state enforced monopoly. How can a non-existent entity be created out of nothing and become part of the vernacular? There is no IP.

Abolishing "Intellectual Property rights" is a losing argument.
 
Abolishing "Intellectual Property rights" is a losing argument.

There is no such thing as intellectual property. There is nothing to abolish, There is no right.
I was going to ask you to show me where this term Intellectual Property existed pre-1800. I googled it myself...

John McLean, ...
"Congress, then, by this act, instead of sanctioning an existing right, as contended, created it."[3] McLean also rejected Wheaton's contention that requiring registration and the other conditions of the law were improper. Congress was giving Wheaton and other creators a special protection and it was not unreasonable to expect them to observe the formalities, the Court ruled.

Does this make it any cleare for you.
 
There is no such thing as intellectual property. There is nothing to abolish, There is no right.
I was going to ask you to show me where this term Intellectual Property existed pre-1800. I googled it myself...

John McLean, ...

Does this make it any cleare for you.

I'm telling you, too many people have too much invested in IP. You need to have a better argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRB
Back
Top