Why was there SUCH A HUGE TURNOUT?!

Because Michigan has a population of 7 million and New Hampshire only has a population of 800,000?
 
let me guess.. RON's percentage goes down, the GHOULS goes up.. how did I know?
 
Because Michigan has a population of 7 million and New Hampshire only has a population of 800,000?

That explains it. >_>

Seriously, I expected Ron Paul to get at least 10%, though, and we all KNOW the graph will stay linear, since that's how it works in the real world.
 
Holy hell, Ron Paul has over 10,000 votes, and he's ONLY AT 6%?! This is insane!

The NH Republican turnout was 1/4 of the whole NH population. So do the math with the Michigan turn out which is like 2484611, and with Democrats crossing over it could be a huge turnout.
 
let me guess.. RON's percentage goes down, the GHOULS goes up.. how did I know?

Ron's is going up atm.

Coming from someone who used to live in Iowa, maybe this fact will let you in. In Iowa there are more pigs (the animals, no political jibe here) than people in every county except 2.
 
In 2000, Michigan had about 1.2 million votes in their Republican primary... just to put things in perspective.
 
Back
Top