Why the NC Transgender law is retarded, and how it helps perverts

[GunnyFreedom]

Here is the actual bill. I colored the added parts green and the subtracted parts red to make it easier. Show me this minimum wage crap you are talking about. The only thing is says in section 2.1, is that State wage laws take precedence over municipal wage laws. Apparently this was in question since Charlotte was trying to overturn State Law. It is no longer in question. No change has been made to the wage laws, except to clarify that the State has authority over the municipalities, full stop.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SECOND EXTRA SESSION 2016

SESSION LAW 2016-3
HOUSE BILL 2

AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR SINGLE‑SEX MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY BATHROOM AND CHANGING FACILITIES IN SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC AGENCIES AND TO CREATE STATEWIDE CONSISTENCY IN REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS.

Whereas, the North Carolina Constitution directs the General Assembly to provide for the organization and government of all cities and counties and to give cities and counties such powers and duties as the General Assembly deems advisable in Section 1 of Article VII of the North Carolina Constitution; and

Whereas, the North Carolina Constitution reflects the importance of statewide laws related to commerce by prohibiting the General Assembly from enacting local acts regulating labor, trade, mining, or manufacturing in Section 24 of Article II of the North Carolina Constitution; and

Whereas, the General Assembly finds that laws and obligations consistent statewide for all businesses, organizations, and employers doing business in the State will improve intrastate commerce; and

Whereas, the General Assembly finds that laws and obligations consistent statewide for all businesses, organizations, and employers doing business in the State benefit the businesses, organizations, and employers seeking to do business in the State and attracts new businesses, organizations, and employers to the State; Now, therefore,

The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

PART I. SINGLE‑SEX MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY BATHROOM AND CHANGING FACILITIES

SECTION 1.1. G.S. 115C‑47 is amended by adding a new subdivision to read:​

"(63) To Establish Single‑Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities. – Local boards of education shall establish single‑sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities as provided in G.S. 115C‑521.2."​

SECTION 1.2. Article 37 of Chapter 115C of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:​

"§ 115C‑521.2. Single‑sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities.
(a) Definitions. – The following definitions apply in this section:
(1) Biological sex. – The physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person's birth certificate.
(2) Multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility. – A facility designed or designated to be used by more than one person at a time where students may be in various states of undress in the presence of other persons. A multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility may include, but is not limited to, a school restroom, locker room, changing room, or shower room.
(3) Single occupancy bathroom or changing facility. – A facility designed or designated to be used by only one person at a time where students may be in various states of undress. A single occupancy bathroom or changing facility may include, but is not limited to, a single stall restroom designated as unisex or for use based on biological sex.
(b) Single‑Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities. – Local boards of education shall require every multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility that is designated for student use to be designated for and used only by students based on their biological sex.
(c) Accommodations Permitted. – Nothing in this section shall prohibit local boards of education from providing accommodations such as single occupancy bathroom or changing facilities or controlled use of faculty facilities upon a request due to special circumstances, but in no event shall that accommodation result in the local boards of education allowing a student to use a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated under subsection (b) of this section for a sex other than the student's biological sex.
(d) Exceptions. – This section does not apply to persons entering a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated for use by the opposite sex:
(1) For custodial purposes.
(2) For maintenance or inspection purposes.
(3) To render medical assistance.
(4) To accompany a student needing assistance when the assisting individual is an employee or authorized volunteer of the local board of education or the student's parent or authorized caregiver.
(5) To receive assistance in using the facility.
(6) To accompany a person other than a student needing assistance.
(7) That has been temporarily designated for use by that person's biological sex."​

SECTION 1.3. Chapter 143 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new Article to read:​

"Article 81.
"Single‑Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities.
"§ 143‑760. Single‑sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities.
(a) Definitions. – The following definitions apply in this section:
(1) Biological sex. – The physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person's birth certificate.
(2) Executive branch agency. – Agencies, boards, offices, departments, and institutions of the executive branch, including The University of North Carolina and the North Carolina Community College System.
(3) Multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility. – A facility designed or designated to be used by more than one person at a time where persons may be in various states of undress in the presence of other persons. A multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility may include, but is not limited to, a restroom, locker room, changing room, or shower room.​

(4) Public agency. – Includes any of the following:
a. Executive branch agencies.
b. All agencies, boards, offices, and departments under the direction and control of a member of the Council of State.
c. "Unit" as defined in G.S. 159‑7(b)(15).
d. "Public authority" as defined in G.S. 159‑7(b)(10).
e. A local board of education.
f. The judicial branch.
g. The legislative branch.
h. Any other political subdivision of the State.
​

(5) Single occupancy bathroom or changing facility. – A facility designed or designated to be used by only one person at a time where persons may be in various states of undress. A single occupancy bathroom or changing facility may include, but is not limited to, a single stall restroom designated as unisex or for use based on biological sex.
(b) Single‑Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities. – Public agencies shall require every multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility to be designated for and only used by persons based on their biological sex.
(c) Accommodations Permitted. – Nothing in this section shall prohibit public agencies from providing accommodations such as single occupancy bathroom or changing facilities upon a person's request due to special circumstances, but in no event shall that accommodation result in the public agency allowing a person to use a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated under subsection (b) of this section for a sex other than the person's biological sex.
(d) Exceptions. – This section does not apply to persons entering a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated for use by the opposite sex:
(1) For custodial purposes.
(2) For maintenance or inspection purposes.
(3) To render medical assistance.
(4) To accompany a person needing assistance.
(4a) For a minor under the age of seven who accompanies a person caring for that minor.
(5) That has been temporarily designated for use by that person's biological sex."

​

PART II. STATEWIDE CONSISTENCY IN LAWS RELATED TO EMPLOYMENT AND CONTRACTING

SECTION 2.1. G.S. 95‑25.1 reads as rewritten:​

"§ 95‑25.1. Short title and legislative purpose.purpose; local governments preempted.
(a) This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "Wage and Hour Act."
(b) The public policy of this State is declared as follows: The wage levels of employees, hours of labor, payment of earned wages, and the well‑being of minors are subjects of concern requiring legislation to promote the general welfare of the people of the State without jeopardizing the competitive position of North Carolina business and industry. The General Assembly declares that the general welfare of the State requires the enactment of this law under the police power of the State.
(c) The provisions of this Article supersede and preempt any ordinance, regulation, resolution, or policy adopted or imposed by a unit of local government or other political subdivision of the State that regulates or imposes any requirement upon an employer pertaining to compensation of employees, such as the wage levels of employees, hours of labor, payment of earned wages, benefits, leave, or well‑being of minors in the workforce. This subsection shall not apply to any of the following:
(1) A local government regulating, compensating, or controlling its own employees.
(2) Economic development incentives awarded under Chapter 143B of the General Statutes.
(3) Economic development incentives awarded under Article 1 of Chapter 158 of the General Statutes.
(4) A requirement of federal community development block grants.
(5) Programs established under G.S. 153A‑376 or G.S. 160A‑456."​

SECTION 2.2. G.S. 153A‑449(a) reads as rewritten:​

"(a) Authority. – A county may contract with and appropriate money to any person, association, or corporation, in order to carry out any public purpose that the county is authorized by law to engage in. A county may not require a private contractor under this section to abide by any restriction that the county could not impose on all employers in the county, such as paying minimum wage or providing paid sick leave to its employees, regulations or controls on the contractor's employment practices or mandate or prohibit the provision of goods, services, or accommodations to any member of the public as a condition of bidding on acontract.contract or a qualification‑based selection, except as otherwise required or allowed by State law."​

SECTION 2.3. G.S. 160A‑20.1(a) reads as rewritten:​

"(a) Authority. – A city may contract with and appropriate money to any person, association, or corporation, in order to carry out any public purpose that the city is authorized by law to engage in. A city may not require a private contractor under this section to abide by any restriction that the city could not impose on all employers in the city, such as paying minimum wage or providing paid sick leave to its employees, regulations or controls on the contractor's employment practices or mandate or prohibit the provision of goods, services, or accommodations to any member of the public as a condition of bidding on a contract.contract or a qualification‑based selection, except as otherwise required or allowed by State law."​

PART III. PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS

SECTION 3.1. G.S. 143‑422.2 reads as rewritten:​

"§ 143‑422.2. Legislative declaration.
(a) It is the public policy of this State to protect and safeguard the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain and hold employment without discrimination or abridgement on account of race, religion, color, national origin, age, biological sex or handicap by employers which regularly employ 15 or more employees.
(b) It is recognized that the practice of denying employment opportunity and discriminating in the terms of employment foments domestic strife and unrest, deprives the State of the fullest utilization of its capacities for advancement and development, and substantially and adversely affects the interests of employees, employers, and the public in general.
(c) The General Assembly declares that the regulation of discriminatory practices in employment is properly an issue of general, statewide concern, such that this Article and other applicable provisions of the General Statutes supersede and preempt any ordinance, regulation, resolution, or policy adopted or imposed by a unit of local government or other political subdivision of the State that regulates or imposes any requirement upon an employer pertaining to the regulation of discriminatory practices in employment, except such regulations applicable to personnel employed by that body that are not otherwise in conflict with State law."​

SECTION 3.2. G.S. 143‑422.3 reads as rewritten:​

"§ 143‑422.3. Investigations; conciliations.
The Human Relations Commission in the Department of Administration shall have the authority to receive charges of discrimination from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission pursuant to an agreement under Section 709(b) of Public Law 88‑352, as amended by Public Law 92‑261, and investigate and conciliate charges of discrimination. Throughout this process, the agency shall use its good offices to effect an amicable resolution of the charges of discrimination. This Article does not create, and shall not be construed to create or support, a statutory or common law private right of action, and no person may bring any civil action based upon the public policy expressed herein."​

SECTION 3.3. Chapter 143 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new Article to read:​

"Article 49B.
"Equal Access to Public Accommodations.
"§ 143‑422.10. Short title.
This Article shall be known and may be cited as the Equal Access to Public Accommodations Act.
"§ 143‑422.11. Legislative declaration.
(a) It is the public policy of this State to protect and safeguard the right and opportunity of all individuals within the State to enjoy fully and equally the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of places of public accommodation free of discrimination because of race, religion, color, national origin, or biological sex, provided that designating multiple or single occupancy bathrooms or changing facilities according to biological sex, as defined in G.S. 143‑760(a)(1), (3), and (5), shall not be deemed to constitute discrimination.​

(b) The General Assembly declares that the regulation of discriminatory practices in places of public accommodation is properly an issue of general, statewide concern, such that this Article and other applicable provisions of the General Statutes supersede and preempt any ordinance, regulation, resolution, or policy adopted or imposed by a unit of local government or other political subdivision of the State that regulates or imposes any requirement pertaining to the regulation of discriminatory practices in places of public accommodation.
"§ 143‑422.12. Places of public accommodation – defined.
For purposes of this Article, places of public accommodation has the same meaning as defined in G.S. 168A‑3(8), but shall exclude any private club or other establishment not, in fact, open to the public.
"§ 143‑422.13. Investigations; conciliations.
The Human Relations Commission in the Department of Administration shall have the authority to receive, investigate, and conciliate complaints of discrimination in public accommodations. Throughout this process, the Human Relations Commission shall use its good offices to effect an amicable resolution of the complaints of discrimination. This Article does not create, and shall not be construed to create or support, a statutory or common law private right of action, and no person may bring any civil action based upon the public policy expressed herein."

​

PART IV. SEVERABILITY

SECTION 4. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this act that can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act is temporarily or permanently restrained or enjoined by judicial order, this act shall be enforced as though such restrained or enjoined provisions had not been adopted, provided that whenever such temporary or permanent restraining order or injunction is stayed, dissolved, or otherwise ceases to have effect, such provisions shall have full force and effect.

PART V. EFFECTIVE DATE

SECTION 5. This act is effective when it becomes law and applies to any action taken on or after that date, to any ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy adopted or amended on or after that date, and to any contract entered into on or after that date. The provisions of Sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 of this act supersede and preempt any ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy adopted prior to the effective date of this act that purports to regulate a subject matter preempted by this act or that violates or is not consistent with this act, and such ordinances, resolutions, regulations, or policies shall be null and void as of the effective date of this act.

In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 23[SUP]rd[/SUP] day of March, 2016.


s/ Daniel J. Forest
President of the Senate


s/ Tim Moore
Speaker of the House of Representatives


s/ Pat McCrory
Governor


Approved 9:57 p.m. this 23[SUP]rd[/SUP] day of March, 2016

 

[RJB]

Because it's not a simple repeal of the charlotte law, it's something else, so don't be surprised if people disagree with it for other reasons. Some people don't want government property to be managed like that.

I've noticed despite people's (especially Gunny's) requesting, you have yet to cite a single sentence from the actual legislation to back up what you say.

 

[Origanalist]

 

[Origanalist]

Because it's not a simple repeal of the charlotte law, it's something else, so don't be surprised if people disagree with it for other reasons. Some people don't want government property to be managed like that.

Lolol

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Because it's not a simple repeal of the charlotte law, it's something else, so don't be surprised if people disagree with it for other reasons. Some people don't want government property to be managed like that.

Uhh. English is a language. It's words and constructs have actual meaning. You can disagree with me as to what "See bill run. Run Billy run." means all day long, but you will be wrong. You don't get to come up with your own brand new meanings for basic english text just because your emotions compel you to create controversy out of milk.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

You can't claim it's purely about 'freedom', when you impose the specific restrictions on state buildings too, of course you'll have people opposing it, who don't agree with those restrictions on buildings.



That's not what the wsj and lawyers are saying about the bill.

I don't rightly GAF what a bunch of presstitutes say about the bill. I am a former lawmaker myself, and I have eyeballs and a brain to read and comprehend the actual legislation itself.

 

[erowe1]

Also, you're assuming most bathrooms are kept under lock and key or are actively monitored, they aren't. So if a fake trans man walked into a woman's bathroom, he could give an excuse to enter initially by pretending to be a transman, even without having an id.

In that respect it's no change from the status quo. Anyone can walk into any bathroom without even saying anything to anyone.

But it used to be that when the need arose for property owners to kick men out of women's rooms, they were able to do that. Now, thanks to this NC law, they are still able to do that, notwithstanding the attempts by certain local governments to force them to let men shower with girls.

 

[erowe1]

Because it's not a simple repeal of the charlotte law, it's something else, so don't be surprised if people disagree with it for other reasons. Some people don't want government property to be managed like that.

That's a very generous application of the word "some." So long as government property exists, 99% of us do want government property to be managed like that.

 

[Gh34]

That's a very generous application of the word "some." So long as government property exists, 99% of us do want government property to be managed like that.

If it was 99%, there wouldn't be any controversy in the first place.

I don't rightly GAF what a bunch of presstitutes say about the bill. I am a former lawmaker myself, and I have eyeballs and a brain to read and comprehend the actual legislation itself.

Then you should publish an article about it explaining your reasoning, because many people don't agree with your interpretation.

 

[erowe1]

If it was 99%, there wouldn't be any controversy in the first place.

It's manufactured controversy being pushed by people who want to change the culture.

 

[Gh34]

It's manufactured controversy being pushed by people who want to change the culture.

Except for the fact that is a new law in its entirety and didn't exist decades ago, so this law is the change.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

If it was 99%, there wouldn't be any controversy in the first place.



Then you should publish an article about it explaining your reasoning, because many people don't agree with your interpretation.

All the people who actually wrote the bill seem to agree with my interpretation. All the people who have actually....you know....READ the %$#@#$ bill seem to agree with my interpretation. Why are you going to punish ME because YOU are too %$#$#@ lazy to bother to read the bill? I don't even like the stupid bill and you want ME to run about defending it because YOU can't be bothered to do your own due diligence???

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Except for the fact that is a new law in its entirety and didn't exist decades ago, so this law is the change.

NC is not the first to pass such a law, and NC's version is the most unobtrusive and tame to date. But hey, don't let a crisis go to waste amirite?

 

[Gh34]

NC is not the first to pass such a law, and NC's version is the most unobtrusive and tame to date. But hey, don't let a crisis go to waste amirite?

Doesn't change that this didn't exist decades ago and is a new issue. When even the pro-republican wsj writes that it features the elements regarding the minimum wage, then the burden is on you.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Doesn't change that this didn't exist decades ago and is a new issue. When even the pro-republican wsj writes that it features the elements regarding the minimum wage, then the burden is on you.

Because 20 years ago it was just so common for men to walk into women's rooms claiming to be transgender. This all came out of nowhere, and had nothing at all with the Charlotte City Council holding a gun to private businesses heads and forcing them to let men into their women's rooms against their will. Nope, none of that is relevant, all this is is a bunch of old white CIS gender men who hate on gay people and are simply acting out of bigotry. The fact that it was a special session following the Charlotte ordinance is just coincidence, of course. This is all about antigay bigotry. waaahh waaah waaahhh I will keep inventing shyt to pretend like I am oppressed until oppression loses all meaning to these people. Muhahaha.

 

[Gh34]

Because 20 years ago it was just so common for men to walk into women's rooms claiming to be transgender. This all came out of nowhere, and had nothing at all with the Charlotte City Council holding a gun to private businesses heads and forcing them to let men into their women's rooms against their will. Nope, none of that is relevant, all this is is a bunch of old white CIS gender men who hate on gay people and are simply acting out of bigotry. The fact that it was a special session following the Charlotte ordinance is just coincidence, of course. This is all about antigay bigotry. waaahh waaah waaahhh I will keep inventing shyt to pretend like I am oppressed until oppression loses all meaning to these people. Muhahaha.

Then if it was just about charlotte, they would have simply repealed the charlotte bill only instead of embellishing all these other details to the bill.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Then if it was just about charlotte, they would have simply repealed the charlotte bill only instead of embellishing all these other details to the bill.

You know that huh? You know Tim Moore, Skip Stam, and Bob Steinburg well enough to know that they will prefer to overturn the Charlotte ordinance and not want to write new law? You know the key players on this bill well enough to know that these veteran legislators never just default to writing new legislation whenever an issue strikes?

 

[Mach]

Hmmmm..... maybe there's something to this stuff....

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

Pertinent: