
I've heard Dr. Paul mentioned - favorably, too - by a Fox Reporter this morning, Cavuto is supposed to have him on before the debate, Hannity and Colmes is supposed to have him on after.
Why?
What is going on?
![]()
Out of curiosity, where is the info that says he will be on Cavuto and Hannity?

We all know that Hannity is FOX's right winged servant and Colmes is FOX's satirical, nerdy-goofy, scapegoat FAKE liberal; After all, FOX is a right winged network notorious for spin and propaganda.
Worst case scenario: We will see five and a half minutes of Hannity shouting Dr. Paul down, quetsioning his patriotism and casting aspersions on his character and 30 seconds of Colmes plugging some gruesome true crime segment on Greta Van Susteren's show.
Best Case Scenario: Ron Paul might be able to get a few words in.
Everyone get ready for the censoring and the manipulation; We'll make FOX pay if they dare to pull an MSNBC, ABC or Yahoo.![]()
You think Ron can't completely dismantle Hannity in a matter of seconds? I watched him do it to Bill Maher, and that guy is a noisy, politically schizophrenic narcissist who even mocks GOD.
Well-founded logic obliterates pomp any day of the week. I would love to see Hannity and Paul face to face for 5 minutes without Hannity wielding the "hang up" button.
They had Newt Gingrich on Fox and Friends this morning. And they were trying to get him to admit that he was thinking about running, but instead he talked about how well Ron Paul did in the first debate.
Those fox and friends people didn't even know how to respond to that.
If Ron does well in this debate, then I`m betting the "top tier" guys will all become born-again Constitutionalists.![]()

I agree, I'm GLAD they are breaking the silence!
At the opening of the interview a few minutes ago on Fox, Cavuto specifically said that Fox News has NEVER had so many requests to get a single individual on the air as they have had for Ron Paul.
![]()