Why I changed my mind about Black Lives Matter

Occam's Banana

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
40,895
Why I changed my mind about Black Lives Matter
https://www.rocanews.com/blog-posts/how-i-came-to-oppose-black-lives-matter
Thaddeus Russell (31 August 2020)

Like many Americans, after August 9, 2014 I was convinced that the criminal justice system was fundamentally racist, and that police routinely murdered unarmed and innocent black people. That was the day that 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot to death by officer Darren Wilson of the Ferguson, Missouri police force. It was also the day when major news outlets began reporting on the shooting without failing to name Brown as “black” and Wilson as “white,” underscoring the implicit assumption that the difference in their purported races was the most salient and newsworthy fact about the case.

Over time, I have realized two fundamental flaws with this understanding of events.

First, the facts of the Brown case have changed. [...]

Second are the broader trends I have learned about police violence and race.

Early in the morning on the same day Michael Brown was killed, on a road in Springfield Township, Pennsylvania, state police officers approached Joseph Penderghest III, who was cutting himself with a folding knife. According to a local news report, the police “attempted to stop Penderghest from harming himself using verbal commands, pepper spray and stun guns, but were unsuccessful.” The officers never saw any weapon on Penderghest other than the knife, and in the words of the York County district attorney who investigated the case, they perceived him to be a “paranoid, delusional and suicidal man.” And yet the fully armed troopers opened fire when Penderghest began walking toward them. At least one bullet hit Penderghest, who fell to the ground. He managed to rise to his feet, at which point the police fired multiple rounds and “fatally wounded” the suicidal man.

(A side note: Americans in psychological crisis are killed at alarmingly high rates compared to their counterparts elsewhere. Some advocates for police reform have noted that in most other civilized countries, armed police are not given the responsibility of handling such people. It is highly unlikely for suicidal people outside the U.S. to die at the hands of police, a fact that should lead to at least one major reform in America’s criminal justice system.)

I did not know about the killing of Joseph Penderghest until I began researching for this post. Nor did I know about the many other white people who had been killed by police for little or no justifiable reason. Only recently did I learn that since 2015 – soon after the day Michael Brown and Joseph Penderghest lost their lives – law enforcement has killed at least 356 completely unarmed people, of whom 146 were white and 125 were black. While these numbers are disproportionate (whites account for 63% of the population, blacks 13%), they actually indicate lower rates of police violence against black people than one would expect when controlling for violent crime rates and police interactions.

[...]

For those of us who find the killings of Michael Brown or Joseph Penderghest or George Floyd unacceptable; who believe that police in this country have far too many responsibilities; that those responsibilities result in frequent and often deadly interactions with civilians; and that the criminal justice system has killed or incarcerated far too many white people for us to believe that it is primarily driven by any kind of explicit or systemic racism, the narrative put forward by the Black Lives Matter movement and its allies in major news outlets is the main obstacle to meaningful police reform.

The fight isn’t between black and white. The fight is between the state and all of us.
 
and that the criminal justice system has killed or incarcerated far too many white people for us to believe that it is primarily driven by any kind of explicit or systemic racism, the narrative put forward by the Black Lives Matter movement and its allies in major news outlets is the main obstacle to meaningful police reform.

iu
 
When the statists come to kill you they dont care what color you are , any such belief is foolish .
 
The entire article just in case it goes down the memory hole.


Why I changed my mind about Black Lives Matter

https://www.rocanews.com/blog-posts/how-i-came-to-oppose-black-lives-matter

Thaddeus Russell

August 31, 2020

Thaddeus Russell is the founder and CEO of Renegade University, the host of the Unregistered podcast and the author of A Renegade History of the United States.

Like many Americans, after August 9, 2014 I was convinced that the criminal justice system was fundamentally racist, and that police routinely murdered unarmed and innocent black people. That was the day that 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot to death by officer Darren Wilson of the Ferguson, Missouri police force. It was also the day when major news outlets began reporting on the shooting without failing to name Brown as “black” and Wilson as “white,” underscoring the implicit assumption that the difference in their purported races was the most salient and newsworthy fact about the case.

Over time, I have realized two fundamental flaws with this understanding of events.

First, the facts of the Brown case have changed. In the initial version of events, Brown was unarmed, and, according to the friend who was with him, had his hands held over his head in an act of surrender when Wilson opened fire. The apocryphal protest phrase “hands up, don’t shoot!” comes from this description.

Yet a subsequent Department of Justice report showed that Michael Brown’s friend – the primary witness – was almost certainly lying about the events that led to Wilson’s firing his gun, calling the friend’s claims “irreconcilable” with the physical evidence. Rather than Brown having his hands up, seven months after the killing, DOJ presented substantial evidence suggesting that he was actually moving toward Wilson when he was shot.

Second are the broader trends I have learned about police violence and race.

Early in the morning on the same day Michael Brown was killed, on a road in Springfield Township, Pennsylvania, state police officers approached Joseph Penderghest III, who was cutting himself with a folding knife. According to a local news report, the police “attempted to stop Penderghest from harming himself using verbal commands, pepper spray and stun guns, but were unsuccessful.” The officers never saw any weapon on Penderghest other than the knife, and in the words of the York County district attorney who investigated the case, they perceived him to be a “paranoid, delusional and suicidal man.” And yet the fully armed troopers opened fire when Penderghest began walking toward them. At least one bullet hit Penderghest, who fell to the ground. He managed to rise to his feet, at which point the police fired multiple rounds and “fatally wounded” the suicidal man.

(A side note: Americans in psychological crisis are killed at alarmingly high rates compared to their counterparts elsewhere. Some advocates for police reform have noted that in most other civilized countries, armed police are not given the responsibility of handling such people. It is highly unlikely for suicidal people outside the U.S. to die at the hands of police, a fact that should lead to at least one major reform in America’s criminal justice system.)

I did not know about the killing of Joseph Penderghest until I began researching for this post. Nor did I know about the many other white people who had been killed by police for little or no justifiable reason. Only recently did I learn that since 2015 – soon after the day Michael Brown and Joseph Penderghest lost their lives – law enforcement has killed at least 356 completely unarmed people, of whom 146 were white and 125 were black. While these numbers are disproportionate (whites account for 63% of the population, blacks 13%), they actually indicate lower rates of police violence against black people than one would expect when controlling for violent crime rates and police interactions.

The Department of Justice report did reveal another damning trend about state abuse that is unconnected to race: it showed that the Ferguson city government had enacted sizeable increases in municipal fines and fees each year, while ordering “police and court staff to deliver those revenue increases.” City officials routinely urged the police chief to generate government revenue through law enforcement. For Michael Brown and other residents of Ferguson, this meant frequent encounters with police that left many impoverished, humiliated, brutalized, locked up, or even dead.

I would never tell my son to confront a cop the way that Michael Brown probably did, but given what I now know about the relationship between police and the residents of Ferguson, I understand why a young man would be angry enough to do it.

Ferguson isn’t unique. Since the DOJ’s report, we have learned that many cities use policing as a principal means of revenue extraction, and that, despite what supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement tell us to do in November, most such municipalities are run by Democratic mayors and city councils.

For those of us who find the killings of Michael Brown or Joseph Penderghest or George Floyd unacceptable; who believe that police in this country have far too many responsibilities; that those responsibilities result in frequent and often deadly interactions with civilians; and that the criminal justice system has killed or incarcerated far too many white people for us to believe that it is primarily driven by any kind of explicit or systemic racism, the narrative put forward by the Black Lives Matter movement and its allies in major news outlets is the main obstacle to meaningful police reform.

The fight isn’t between black and white. The fight is between the state and all of us.
 
I for one didn't find Michael Brown's death unacceptable, he fought the cop for his gun. George Floyd died because he had drugs in his system and then freaked out when he was arrested for an admittedly petty crime. He wasn't killed over racism and neither was Brown, but they both have sparked a rise in the victimhood mantra that really doesn't fit the facts.
 
Want to end the amount of police violence

1 End the drug war

2. End qualified immunity or make it easier for their to be investigations by third party organizations on police violence and ability to hold serious incidents to a higher standard in court.

3. Defund all federal funding to local police

4. Suicidal calls should only be supported by Police to provide perimeter security. In no way should Police be directly dealing with the person. A qualified team of mental health experts should be the ones handling the incident directly. My opinion.

There is other stuff I haven't thought of but this is a start.
 
Want to end the amount of police violence

1 End the drug war

2. End qualified immunity or make it easier for their to be investigations by third party organizations on police violence and ability to hold serious incidents to a higher standard in court.

3. Defund all federal funding to local police

4. Suicidal calls should only be supported by Police to provide perimeter security. In no way should Police be directly dealing with the person. A qualified team of mental health experts should be the ones handling the incident directly. My opinion.

There is other stuff I haven't thought of but this is a start.

Eliminate Circular Force Continuum training.
 
Eliminate Circular Force Continuum training.

What are you're thoughts on how that contributes. Because I've never really considered it. It always made sense that if you had to use force to subdue someone who was violent, then you should only use enough force to maintain control. I've never thought it should be used for non violent arrests.
 
Back
Top