Why HAS global warming slowed? Scientists admit they don't know why

Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
907
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2398753/Why-HAS-global-warming-slowed-Scientists-admit-dont-know-why.html

The intergovernmental study claims scientists are 95 per cent sure that humans are to blame for climate change, but presently they have not come up with a unified reason for why global surface temperatures have not risen as predicted in the past 15 years.

According to the unpublished draft document, scientists believe volcanic ash, less heat from the sun and more heat being absorbed by oceans could explain the mystery.

...According to the draft study, scientists are struggling to predict the impact that global warming will have in certain regions, which is not helpful for government planners, who use the IPCC report to inform policies.
 
Last edited:
That is a BS excuse. The real reason is because they knew from the start that man made global warming was insignificant and posed no risk for animal nor plant life whatsoever! However they wanted to make a living, and this was an easy way to do it, so they will say whatever they have to say to keep the grants coming in and stay employed pushing this BS about man made global warming because it suits their interests and the interests of the elite.
 
Last edited:
That is a BS excuse. The real reason is because they knew from the start the man made global warming was insignificant and posed no risk for Earth whatsoever! However they wanted to make a living, and this was an easy way to do it, so they will say whatever they have to say to keep the grants coming in and stay employed pushing this BS about made made global warming because it suits the interests of the elite.

I think they are just delusional. Activism is rampant in science which is clouding their ability to objectively discern and thus damaging their credibility in the process.
 
I think they are just delusional. Activism is rampant in science which is clouding their ability to objectively discern and thus damaging their credibility in the process.

That could be true as well. I think the majority though are just trying to milk it for all it is worth to them.
 
I know, I know! Because taxes have been increased? As taxes go up, temperatures are stabilized. Obviously a causal relationship exists between the too. If we want 100% stability we will need a 100% tax.

I now declare myself a Government plant...ahahahahabwahahahaha
 
That is a BS excuse. The real reason is because they knew from the start the man made global warming was insignificant and posed no risk for animal or plant life whatsoever! However they wanted to make a living, and this was an easy way to do it, so they will say whatever they have to say to keep the grants coming in and stay employed pushing this BS about man made global warming because it suits the interests of the elite.

This. They're fraudsters.

I'm so sick of hearing from these liars. They even invaded a dream I had a couple of nights ago. Check this out:

I was in some university and there were choppers outside, buzzing the building, very close. I knew it was a Homeland Security exercise when suddenly they started firing live rounds at the building. We were looking for a place to take cover and kept running into heavy locked metal doors that prevented us from doing so and I became aware that the purpose of them was carbon sequestration and I cursed those idiot global warming tards.

lol
 
This was a good discussion from last fall here at the university. Economics aspect of the discussion i thought was rather good. Is toward the end as I recall.

I don't expect many here to take the time to watch the discussion Q& A but for those who do I think they'll have a better idea of where the activism actually is at this point. I hate to use the term "activism" because that's not what this is but sometimes you have to make like you're on the bus and just blend in to solicit interest in learning about processes such as these. Processes, meaning transition...which demands knowledge of scope and where we are realistically.

The title of the video itself is actually misleading and, really, this is one for the folks who want to understand what's happening right now both scientifically and from a geopolitical perspective including taxes and economics as applicable to discussion regarding energy here at home.

 
Last edited:
When the East Anglia emails were released, the most interesting one I read was from a guy with the World Bank and the importance of getting the fraudsters' global tax passed.

There are no words for how much I hate these people.
 
Isn't 'carbon sequestration' THE dumbest thing you've ever heard of?! I swear to God I cannot believe people are so damn dumb that they fall for this shit. I read an article a couple of days ago where the fraudsters were trying to raise an alarm that Europe's forest had reached the limits of their ability to absorb CO2. It would laughable if it weren't for the fact that crap like this is being programmed into kids heads. It's mind blowing that adults, some who seem fairly bright, like Chis Hayes (even though he's an MSNBC commie) believe this stuff. These climatetards actually believe CO2 is poison! Jeez, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone.
 
Meh. You won't be there until you get around to asking who the heck paid for these assholes to up and move to Mars?

Ah haaaaa.....:rolleyes:


That's getting into the woo category but there is a belief among some that they're from Mars and they long to go back. Another thread, lol.
 
Speaking of carbon sequestration ....

While doing some reading on salt domes during the BP oil disaster, I found out that stimulus funds were spent to pump CO2 into salt domes in Louisiana. It's just insane. The amount of time, money and effort devoted to a 'problem' that doesn't exist.
 
Speaking of carbon sequestration ....

While doing some reading on salt domes during the BP oil disaster, I found out that stimulus funds were spent to pump CO2 into salt domes in Louisiana. It's just insane. The amount of time, money and effort devoted to a 'problem' that doesn't exist.

susano, I've rarely seen you post here yet you are one of the original members. In fact, I don't recall ever reading any of your posts so I don't know what your leanings are relative to all of this.

Is this a topic that interests you more than others?
 
Last edited:
Isn't 'carbon sequestration' THE dumbest thing you've ever heard of?! I swear to God I cannot believe people are so damn dumb that they fall for this shit. I read an article a couple of days ago where the fraudsters were trying to raise an alarm that Europe's forest had reached the limits of their ability to absorb CO2. It would laughable if it weren't for the fact that crap like this is being programmed into kids heads. It's mind blowing that adults, some who seem fairly bright, like Chis Hayes (even though he's an MSNBC commie) believe this stuff. These climatetards actually believe CO2 is poison! Jeez, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone.

People will believe what is told to them from "authorities" when they do not have the ability, or will not use their ability, to think for themselves.
 
susano, I've rarely seen you post here yet you are one of the original members. In fact, I don't recall ever reading any of your posts so I don't know what your leanings are relative to all of this.

Is this a topic that interests you more than others?

I'm kind of an infrequent poster, spending most of my forum time on conspiracy and general discussion boards.

It's a topic that has infuriated me but not any more than several others. I do take the time to keep abreast of the latest bullshit, though. I see AGW as a transfer of wealth/tax scam, mainly to benefit the banksters and being used for "Enterprise Corruption" to build infrastructure in 'under-developed' nations for multinational corporate exploitation, sold as 'helping the poor' and helping the environment.
 
People will believe what is told to them from "authorities" when they do not have the ability, or will not use their ability, to think for themselves.

I agree but when I mentioned Chris Hayes I brought him because he's obviously not some mall rat type. In spite of his political views he seems like a very smart guy, yet he lacks the brains to see junk science for the fraud that it is. I really find that astounding. I often wonder if it's some kind of mind control.
 
With Al Gore’s vast collection of overly large homes and monitors aside, temperatures have only decreased because Mr. Gore has finally decided to clean his massive home office, having recycled the small forest that had to be cut down to provide him with material for which craft his propaganda for public dissemination:

gore_desk.jpg



carbon-tax-al-gore.jpg
 
Back
Top