Why do we need guns?...

Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
6,870
...because of idiots like this:





We need to ban all guns to save many peoples lives!! I thank all of you who voted for Obama since he will ban guns and restore peace to america. People shouldn't have to worry about some criminal or redneck killing them. Rednecks support the killings and mass shootings at columbine, virginia tech and love to expand their political agenda. We need a total ban all guns in all 57 states RIGHT NOW!!! I have the right to feel safe, it's in the constitution.


Note 1: 5:30 is of interest.


Note 2: I really hope he's joking, but I'm not sure.
 
Sadly, yes. However, I would still put my money on troll.
 
A right to feel safe? And thats in the Constitution of the 57 States? But a right to own a gun ISNT?

/facepalm
 
Please don't do it. I'm proud of my REPutation as it is. It means I'm not part of the crowd of sheeple and that I'm capable of independent thought.
 
Thankfully , I have seen no zombies ...

Trust me, they are all around us. Hiding. Waiting. Watching. And JUST when you thought you were safe BANG!!!!! You're getting your brains eaten. I'm telling ya, best to have a gun on you at all times. Those zombies are sneaky bastards...

Guy on the video???

ZOMBIE!!!!

With a toothache, apparently.

And sinus congestion.

(Trust me...)

"320 rounds on average per second" Awesome!!!! I WANT one of those!!!!

Check out the poster at .37. Some of the labels are really freaking funny.

"Black color scheme make bullets more deadly" (I got nuthin' to say about this one)

"I don't know what these are, but they sure do look scary" (My personal favorite)

"Flash hider makes it impossible to find the shooter" ('cause he is rendered "invisible")

"High capacity "clips" provide an endless number of bullets" (Cool! No more trips to the store!)

"Firing selector has two modes "Safe" and "Killing Spree"" (Damn! Mine just says 'Safe" and "Semi" I feel rooked.)
 
Last edited:
If you believe in Liberty the question should never be why do we need this or that, the question should always be why should we ban this or that. Way too many laws!
 
Please don't do it. I'm proud of my REPutation as it is. It means I'm not part of the crowd of sheeple and that I'm capable of independent thought.

Please don't do that.

You need to follow our guidelines or you will be removed from the premises.
 
Help me out here. What part of the guidelines say I can't request a member to not give me a rep. You mean I have to accept a positive "rep" if someone says they want to give me one, and I'm prohibited from requesting them not to?

Seriously. Did I miss that part? I really do want to follow the guidelines, so please point it out to me.


Forum Guidelines

+ Posting of direct or inferred threats of violence against other people or property that is not your own is completely unacceptable by any user and subject to immediate banning.

+ No promotion of illegal activities.

+ Thread starters who are promoting their own material will be limited to two personal thread bumps.

+ Insulting or personally attacking other users is not allowed by any member. There is very little tolerance for violations, particular for new members. Reason: Insults lead to retaliation. This often results in a disruption of the board, which dilute the resources of members and the intent of the forum.

+ Off-topic posts - Posts that do not relate to the threads intent are subject to being deleted.

+ Topics posted in the wrong sub-forum are subject to being moved or deleted. Please understand the sub-forum division before starting a new topic. Suggestions for new sub-forums are always welcome. Reason: Leads to most effective use of users resources.

+ Any form of antagonizing other members is not allowed by non-established members.

+ If you are to be critical of another users ideas or message please do so in a respectful manner. It is possible to discuss your points as to why you feel the way you do, ideally you should include alternate suggestions or acknowledge you have none.

+ No posting of graphically offensive material. If there is a valid reason that relates to the campaign as to why something graphic is of value then post a link to the content and provide a clear warning adjacent to the link explaining the issue.

+ Floods of low-value material may be subject to being moved into an alternate sub-forum or deleted. More tolerance will be allowed for established members. Reason: Excessive low value posts dilute users time spent on the forum just reading topic threads.

+ No posting of others personal contact information.

+ No posting of any proclaimed campaign announcement that is not supported with a link to the campaigns homepage or other directly verifiable source.

+ Promoting agendas alternate to the platform of Dr. Paul will have allowances for established members. Controversial topics should focus on facts whenever possible.

+ Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. It will not be tolerated here.

+ Use relevant and descriptive topic titles. Poorly titled messages may be renamed. Reason: Respect time of other users.

+ No promoting of campaign tactics or other activity that grossly counter the morals or ethics of Dr. Paul.

+ No excessive / pointless negativity on the campaign, its future or elements of it. All messages with a negative tone about the campaign from new users must provide supportive facts as to why there is a perceived negative and provide some suggested solutions to the issue.

+ Ad hominem attacks on other candidates and their support groups are discouraged. This is not a moderatable offense for established users but will have low tolerances for non-established users. All are encouraged to address other candidates with their proper name. Reason: This activity is discouraged as it can be used to generate a negative image for our support community.

+ Care should be used when soliciting money for some effort to support the campaign as it is totally possible that a scammer will be looking to take advantage of the good nature of Ron Paul supporters. If you're going to do anything that will solicit taking money you'd be wise to make sure you have some established credibility within the community that matches what you expect. If you don't have that, try to set up some arrangements with a third party that does that so people send money to the trusted third party who make sure it goes where intended. When asking for money or promoting an event that you make money from, you should be transparent about any fees or percentages you will receive.

+ Read the welcoming message for each sub-forum to understand specific guidelines needed to achieve the objective of that sub-forum.
 
Last edited:
Seriously. Did I miss that part? I really do want to follow the guidelines, so please point it out to me.

It's possible that he may not be referring to that particular post, but to some of the guidelines lines in general. Just a guess.


+ Insulting or personally attacking other users is not allowed by any member. There is very little tolerance for violations, particular for new members. Reason: Insults lead to retaliation. This often results in a disruption of the board, which dilute the resources of members and the intent of the forum.

+ Any form of antagonizing other members is not allowed by non-established members.

+ If you are to be critical of another users ideas or message please do so in a respectful manner. It is possible to discuss your points as to why you feel the way you do, ideally you should include alternate suggestions or acknowledge you have none.
 
It's possible that he may not be referring to that particular post, but to some of the guidelines lines in general. Just a guess.


+ Insulting or personally attacking other users is not allowed by any member. There is very little tolerance for violations, particular for new members. Reason: Insults lead to retaliation. This often results in a disruption of the board, which dilute the resources of members and the intent of the forum.

+ Any form of antagonizing other members is not allowed by non-established members.

+ If you are to be critical of another users ideas or message please do so in a respectful manner. It is possible to discuss your points as to why you feel the way you do, ideally you should include alternate suggestions or acknowledge you have none.

He specifically quoted me in that particular post and asked to "please don't do that." So, again. What guideline does what I said violate?
 
He specifically quoted me in that particular post and asked to "please don't do that." So, again. What guideline does what I said violate?

Do you mind taking it with him privately instead of shitting all over this thread? Thanks.
 
Back
Top