Why do so many Ron Paul members doubt the dangers of socialism?

Madison320

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
6,028
I'm arguing with several people over in the World section who believe that problems in Venezuela are being made up by the MSM and US government. I think if someone really understands the consequences of socialism, especially extreme socialism, they wouldn't even have to watch the news to know things were going to get bad in Venezuela. When I heard Chavez was nationalizing businesses and setting price controls, like 10 years ago, I didn't need the media to tell me what was going to happen. So now the stuff has hit the fan from price controls and elimination of private property rights, like night follows day. Yet these supposed libertarians think it's all a media and government conspiracy.

This doesn't mean I'm in favor of interventionism, I'm against it. It just means I understand the effects of socialism.

Here's a tiny bit of what Chavez has done and this was a while time ago. There's been even more bad things that have happened since then:

Factbox: Venezuela's nationalizations under Chavez
6 MIN READ

(Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was re-elected on Sunday to another six-year term, potentially extending his rule to two decades and cementing his status as a dominant figure in modern Latin American history.

In 14 years in office, Chavez has nationalized major swaths of the OPEC nation’s economy as part of a socialist agenda.

Venezuelans expect more takeovers to come, possibly in the banking, health and food sectors.

Below are the main nationalizations under Chavez:

OIL
* In 2007, Chavez’s government took a majority stake in four oil projects in the vast Orinoco heavy crude belt worth an estimated $30 billion in total.

Exxon Mobil Corp and ConocoPhillips quit the country as a result and filed arbitration claims. Late last year, an arbitration panel ordered Venezuela to pay Exxon $908 million, though a larger case is still ongoing.

France’s Total SA and Norway’s StatoilHydro ASA received about $1 billion in compensation after reducing their holdings. Britain’s BP Plc and America’s Chevron Corp remained as minority partners.

* In 2008, Chavez’s administration implemented a windfall tax of 50 percent for prices over $70 per barrel, and 60 percent on oil over $100. Oil reached $147 that year, but soon slumped.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISING


* In 2009, Chavez seized a major gas injection project belonging to Williams Cos Inc and a range of assets from local service companies. This year, the energy minister said the government would pay $420 million to Williams and one of its U.S. partners, Exterran Holdings, for the takeover.

* In June 2010, the government seized 11 oil rigs from Oklahoma-based Helmerich & Payne Inc.

AGRICULTURE
* In 2009, Chavez nationalized a rice mill operated by a local unit of U.S. food giant Cargill Inc.

* In October 2010, Venezuela nationalized Fertinitro, one of the world’s biggest producers of nitrogen fertilizer, as well as Agroislena, a major local agricultural supply company. It also said it would take control of nearly 200,000 hectares (494,000 acres) of land owned by British meat company Vestey Foods.

* Vestey had already filed for arbitration over the earlier takeover of a ranch. Chavez said the latest deal with Vestey was a “friendly agreement.”

* In 2005, Chavez began implementing a 2001 law letting the state expropriate unproductive farms or seize land without proper titles. He has redistributed millions of acres deemed idle to boost food production and ease rural poverty.

* Chavez’s government has repeatedly threatened to seize Empresas Polar, Venezuela’s biggest employer and largest brewer and food processor.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISING


FINANCE
* In June 2010, Venezuela took over the mid-sized bank Banco Federal, citing liquidity problems and risk of fraud. The bank was closely linked to anti-government TV station Globovision.

* In 2009, Chavez paid $1 billion for Banco de Venezuela, a division of Spanish bank Grupo Santander.

* The government has closed a dozen small banks since November 2009 for what it said were operational irregularities. Some were reopened as state-run firms. Brokerages have also been closed and some employees jailed. Chavez has vowed to nationalize any bank that fails to meet government lending guidelines or is in financial trouble.

INDUSTRY
* In October 2010, Chavez ordered the takeover of the local operations of Owens Illinois Inc, which describes itself as the world’s largest glass container maker.

* Chavez in April 2008 announced the government takeover of the cement sector, targeting Switzerland’s Holcim Ltd, France’s Lafarge SA, and Mexico’s Cemex SAB de CV.

GOLD
* Chavez has considered bringing mining more firmly into state hands, and in 2009 the mining ministry seized Gold Reserve Inc’s Brisas project, which sits on one of Latin America’s largest gold veins. Gold Reserve immediately filed for arbitration with ICSID.

Pence, allies take new steps against Maduro
* In August 2011, Chavez said he was nationalizing the gold industry. Toronto-listed Rusoro Mining Ltd, owned by Russia’s Agapov family, was the only large gold miner operating in Venezuela, and this year it filed for arbitration.

STEEL
* The government paid $2 billion in 2009 for Argentine-led Ternium SA’s stake in Venezuela’s largest steel mill.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS
* In 2007, the nation’s largest telecommunications company CANTV was nationalized after the government bought out the U.S.-based Verizon Communications Inc’s 28.5 percent stake for $572 million. Analysts said Verizon received fair compensations for its assets.

POWER
* In 2007, Venezuela expropriated the assets of U.S.-based AES Corp in Electricidad de Caracas, the nation’s largest private power producer. The government paid AES $740 million for its 82 percent stake in the company. Analysts described the deal as fair for AES.

TRANSPORT
* In September 2011, the government nationalized a local ferry company, Conferry, which operates from the mainland to the resort island of Margarita. Conferry is owned by a wealthy family and began operating in 1959.

TOURISM
* In October 2011, Chavez said his government would seize private homes on the Los Roques archipelago in the Caribbean and use them for state-run tourism. The islands are among the nation’s favorite and most expensive tourist spots, with pristine white beaches and coral reefs that teem with sea life.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-election-nationalizations/factbox-venezuelas-nationalizations-under-chavez-idUSBRE89701X20121008
 
You started this thread to call out the straw man you created?

Answer me this: Is it impossible for a socialist to create a bad situation, and then for the CIA to exacerbate it?

Is it possible? Or is the world too black-and-white for that?

Yes, socialists shoot themselves in the foot. Can the CIA not also shoot their other foot? Do all socialists have only one foot?
 
Last edited:
You started this thread to call out the straw man you created?

Answer me this: Is it impossible for a socialist to create a bad situation, and then for the CIA to exacerbate it?

Is it possible? Or is the world too black-and-white for that?

I think you just described the last 70 years of history.
 
Pure speculation on my part, but I don't think that it has anything to do with socialism or virtues of Venezuela and the Venezuelan government whatsoever. Rather, there are some people who are so knee-jerk anti-American-establishment that they will reflexively take the side of literally anything or anyone who seems to be in opposition to it, no matter who it is. In the case of Venezuela, you have a political party and government which uses the United States as its scapegoat for everything that goes wrong in the country, and so in the course of keeping their people in line by hyping up the great satan, they happen to produce propaganda which is appealing to those who are not fans of American government.
 
Last edited:
You started this thread to call out the straw man you created?

Answer me this: Is it impossible for a socialist to create a bad situation, and then for the CIA to exacerbate it?

Is it possible? Or is the world too black-and-white for that?

Yes, socialists shoot themselves in the foot. Can the CIA not also shoot their other foot? Do all socialists have only one foot?

Yes of course the government can try to exaggerate it. But that wasn't what some people were claiming in the other thread.

Considering how much of the economy was nationalized I'm guessing the situation is actually worse than being reported.
 
Last edited:
I personally dislike socialists a very , very great deal. As a peaceful person though the only ones I want removed are the ones in my own country .
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
I personally dislike socialists a very , very great deal. As a peaceful person though the only ones I want removed are the ones in my own country .

Yup..
This country has been socialist since before I was born..
And I have watched it go downhill since..

And we have been manipulating and meddling in Venezuela since before I was born..

and our media as well as the OP want me to think it was somebody other than the chosen dictator(and his masters) that caused the problems.
 
Yes of course the government can try to exaggerate it. But that wasn't what some people were claiming in the other thread.

Considering how much of the economy was nationalized I'm guessing the situation is actually worse than being reported.

What people on your side cannot understand is that even though socialism is bad, it is not fatal and secondly, people and govt make adjustments depending on the result they get. You will never know if said mixed economic system govt will make an adjustment before the CIA comes to take it over if everytime the CIA comes to take it over.

How about this, can u give me an example of a mixed economic system(what u guys call a socialist govt) which has failed without US govt interference? To be fair, this is not a fair question to ask cos virtually all failed govt have been interfered with by the US govt. On the other hand, I can give you multiple examples of countries that trived while being very socialistic and only failed when the US invaded.
 
Yup..
This country has been socialist since before I was born..
And I have watched it go downhill since..

And we have been manipulating and meddling in Venezuela since before I was born..

and our media as well as the OP want me to think it was somebody other than the chosen dictator(and his masters) that caused the problems.

You got that backwards. I'm the OP and I'm saying it's entirely the fault of Chavez and Maduro and their socialist policies. Not a US conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Yup..
This country has been socialist since before I was born..
And I have watched it go downhill since..

And we have been manipulating and meddling in Venezuela since before I was born..

and our media as well as the OP want me to think it was somebody other than the chosen dictator(and his masters) that caused the problems.

This is 1958 in Venezuela with Nixon coming to visit. Just see the welcome party they threw for him

BE032271.jpg


an-automobile-that-has-sustained-damage-following-a-mob-attack-in-caracas-venezuela-a7a221-1600.jpg


C_rabtbVoAEgOnW.jpg


IMG_20160513_081620-e1463156979700-540x405.jpg




No doubt, the history of the US in Venezuela is long and it seems like no matter what the US govt does, they don't seem to want us around. Maybe we should be better listeners and just leave em alone.
 
What people on your side cannot understand is that even though socialism is bad, it is not fatal and secondly, people and govt make adjustments depending on the result they get. You will never know if said mixed economic system govt will make an adjustment before the CIA comes to take it over if everytime the CIA comes to take it over.

How about this, can u give me an example of a mixed economic system(what u guys call a socialist govt) which has failed without US govt interference? To be fair, this is not a fair question to ask cos virtually all failed govt have been interfered with by the US govt. On the other hand, I can give you multiple examples of countries that trived while being very socialistic and only failed when the US invaded.

Here's a few. Cuba, USSR, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Ecuador, Argentina, Greece.

Some really good side by side comparisons with East and West Germany and North and South Korea.

How could I forget China and the incredible turnaround when they switched to a much more capitalistic economy?
 
Last edited:
You got that backwards. I'm the OP and I'm saying it's entirely the fault of Chavez and Maduro and their socialist policies. Not a US conspiracy.

Well, history isn't on your side. Socialist states awash in natural resources aren't that quick to collapse--even when the price goes down. And the U.S. government isn't that likely to let a perfectly good crisis go to waste--like the one the dropping oil price caused in micromismanaged Venezuela.

Here's a few. Cuba, USSR, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Ecuador, Argentina, Greece.

Some really good side by side comparisons with East and West Germany and North and South Korea.

How could I forget China and the incredible turnaround when they switched to a much more capitalistic economy?

We embargoed the snot out of Cuba--even to the point of blockading them for a short while. The CIA sent in one Regime Change Team that we know of. Reagan and Bush both took credit for crashing the USSR and East Germany with the Cold War weapons race, for what that's worth. We embargoed the snot out of South Africa. It was the poster child for intervention for almost a decade.

I hate it when someone has a good point, but whose argument argues against that point. Couldn't you have limited that post to China and Greece?
 
Last edited:
Well, history isn't on your side. Socialist states awash in natural resources aren't that quick to collapse--even when the price goes down. And the U.S. government isn't that likely to let a perfectly good crisis go to waste--like the dropping oil price.

It depends on the degree of socialization. Venezuela went hard core socialism, basically communism.

So are you claiming that there's no way Venezuela could've collapsed that quickly? That it had to be some sort of interference? Did you read that list of nationalized companies I posted?
 
It depends on the degree of socialization. Venezuela went hard core socialism, basically communism.

So are you claiming that there's no way Venezuela could've collapsed that quickly? That it had to be some sort of interference? Did you read that list of nationalized companies I posted?

Obviously there was a way for Venezuela to collapse by now.

Whether U.S. help was needed is academic. This collapse clearly also had U.S. help. I'm not interested in turning a blind eye to either of the two major causes of that mess. There's too much evidence of all of the above.
 
Here's a few. Cuba, USSR, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Ecuador, Argentina, Greece.

Some really good side by side comparisons with East and West Germany and North and South Korea.

You got to put year like Ecuador 2000 etc.

Cuba - We had an embargo, sanction plus many failed attempt at invasion/assassination of their leader. Essentially they have been in a state of war since their independence from their US puppet leaders.

USSR - the US was actively trying to sabotage the nation and communism in general. Do we not remember the cold war? real proxy wars in Afghanistan where the purpose was to trip the Soviet union up. US sabotage and interference in the USSR is well know, you should do some research before putting USSR on the list

Btw, the 2 countries above where communist countries not mixed economy with socialism and yet they needed a multi decade effort by the US and its allies inorder to get it to collapse

Zimbabwe - Little is known about this but the US actually placed several sanctions on the country, not saying it wouldn't have collapsed but the rule states without US interference.

Argentina and Ecadour - I need to look up this one, also need a year when it collapsed to do my research.

Greece - I will leave this article when it comes to Greece, it is not as simple as saying socialism led to Greece's collapse

Back in 2001, Goldman Sachs struck a deal with the Greek government to mask their debt in order to gain entrance to the European Union. These "currency exchanges" were hidden, off-the-market, making the Greek economy appear to be better off than it actual was. These weapons of mass financial destruction resulted in Goldman profiting in the hundreds of millions, at least. For more information on this and other acts of financial terrorism in the global markets, see recently ranked #1 Most Dangerous People in Financial Media, Max Keiser and Stacey Herbert from the Keiser Report on RT.

Goldman Sachs, an investment bank headed by CEO Lloyd Blankfein, has a history of controversial activities. Goldman's involvement in child sex trafficking certainly raises a few eyebrows. Twelve-year Goldman recruiter Greg Smith authored an op-ed in the New York Times citing a "toxic and destructive" environment within the Wall Street oligarch's workplace. Thanks to Ron Paul's efforts to audit the Federal Reserve, a partial audit revealed that Goldman received a $814 billion loan from the Fed during the 2008 crisis. As former Obama White House Chief of Staff and former Goldman adviser Rahm Emmanuel said, "You never want a serious crisis go to waste."

The revolving door between Washington D.C. and Wall Street shows that not only do Goldman alumni hold some of the highest positions in financial areas of our government; the tentacles of this vampire squid have extraordinary influence in both parties:

Robert Rubin, 26 year Goldman veteran; Bill Clinton's Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, former Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs; George W. Bush's Treasury Secretary Mark Patterson, former Goldman lobbyist; Obama's chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) Elena Kagan, former Goldman adviser; Obama's 2010 Supreme Court appointment

This list goes on and on. And even in Europe. "Well, of course we need those with extensive financial experience to be at the helm of government finances." This is incredibly naive. The power of the Federal Reserve in conjunction with the Wall Street overlords' thirst for risk-free profits should not be underestimated. So powerful in fact, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are Goldman Sachs- approved frontmen. Remember, 'risk-free'.

https://mic.com/articles/9981/ron-p...s-that-goldman-sachs-helped-create#.sxHbCshJq

South Africa: Is South Africa a socialist country? From what I know, it more of a capitalist nation than a socialist one. When I think of welfare state or countries with huge nationalized industries, I think Russia, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Cuba etc etc not South Africa and also I didn't know it has collapsed. Post link to the article cos this is news to me.
 
Last edited:
I don't think very many people you encounter here doubt the dangers of socialism.

Of those that really do, I doubt that very many of them are Ron Paul supporters.

When you get down to the people who really are Ron Paul supporters and who really doubt the dangers of socialism, it's a very tiny and insignificant number.

But there's a caveat. When I say this I'm excluding all the people who support socialist immigration policies. There are a whole lot of those here.
 
Back in 2001, Goldman Sachs struck a deal with the Greek government to mask their debt in order to gain entrance to the European Union. These "currency exchanges" were hidden, off-the-market, making the Greek economy appear to be better off than it actual was.

What point is this supposed to support? It seems to me to support the theory that socialism does indeed precipitate the sort of crises the CIA loves to exploit.

Consider Afghanistan. It isn't socialist at all. And seventeen years later, the greatest military in history still hasn't subjugated it.

Madison320 is clearly, categorically right about one thing. Centralized micromismanagement is no boon to resiliency.
 
Here's a few. Cuba, USSR, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Ecuador, Argentina, Greece.

Some really good side by side comparisons with East and West Germany and North and South Korea.

How could I forget China and the incredible turnaround when they switched to a much more capitalistic economy?

Libya (before US bringing joys of capitalism)? Iraq (before US bringing joys of capitalism)? Syria (before US bringing joys of capitalism)?
 
Back
Top