Thanks. Seems the FUD is strong with this one.
Good question! If you use Satoshi's original client, Bitcoin-QT, yes the user must download and sync the entire blockchain. There are other clients, like Electrum, that don't require this and rely on multiple servers to keep a copy of the blockchain. There is also functionality in the original code that allows the download of the block header instead of the entire block. Not sure if this has been implemented yet.
Bitcoin is in fact one large piece of data. How I spell bitcoin is as meaningless as the original nominal amount of 50 assigned to the genesis block. I am not making an assumption. I am simply defining bitcoin in real terms. It really is one "thing". What you currently "own" is the right to create a marker in the bitcoin data by creating a division of the nominal amount assigned to that particular "block" or code segment in the data. You don't actually own bitcoin, you can't.
You argue for the nominal value which why the idea of there only being one bitcoin goes past you.
It doesn't matter how large the block chain gets there is still only one bitcoin. That is a strawman. I never said anything about the amount of bitcoin having anything to do with block chain size. This is again because you correlating the nominal value to the price that people are willing to pay for the right to divide the nominal value. I ignore the nominal value because I understand that it is meaningless and is only used in the protocol because without a nominal value, people cannot commence to dividing that value, thus the entire point of the math function that generates all this data becomes meaningless (0/x = 0).
Bitcoins are not digital rewards. This is the "token" increase to the nominal amount. The reward is the right (key) to infinitely divide that nominal amount. There is only one bitcoin. What is being sold for real debt is the right to divide the nominal amount (the right to place infinitely new division markers each with their own unique access key with inherent rights to subdivide)
Yes the system does give the miner rights to divide that nominal amount. That is all a miner gets. It doesn't matter what the nominal amount is since all that the miner has control over is the right to subdivide that amount and he could do it an infinite number of times. His hope is that he can sell his right for real debt or goods or services. He hopes he can find someone that wants the right to divide his piece of the bitcoin further.
You should understand that bitcoin is nothing more than a big ol fat nasty data file. It's nice that people refer to these nominal subdivisions as their own unique little entities and subdivide them into infinitely. It's also nice that people say they transact and spend them, but really that is not what is happening.
What people are doing is manipulating the big of fat nasty data file. They pay for the right to do this. Sure you could pay 700 million and be the proud owner of the number 1 million inside of the bitcoin and have the right to divide 1 million until your heart is content. That sounds fantastic! But I could just as simply pay 700 and have control over the number 1 inside of the bitcoin and DO THE EXACT SAME THING.