Who would you least hate to see win the general election?

[boomer]

i'm curious as to why obama

 

[Luther]

i don't even want to ponder on me making that choice right now!!! as far as i'm concerned there are only two candidates running right now: Ron Paul vs. StatusQuo

It's clear that the three candidates listed represent the status quo in very significant ways, but they do have distinct attributes that would make their presidencies different in important ways. McCain is certainly the worst choice of the three; he is certifiably insane; his presidency would probably cause an escalation of the Bush conquest of the Middle East into a world war.

 

[boomer]

Obama's healthcare is at least not mandated like Hillary's....McCain is too liberal and too war mongering

understandable

 

[bappley]

I'm doing a write-in on this poll for ron paul

 

[Dustancostine]

Will never vote for a Socialist Dem, Not ever, Not ever,

McCain is a bizzillion times better than a socialist.

 

[boomer]

do you guys think war mongering is worse than socialist-esque policies?

 

[jsu718]

Of those three, my decision comes completely aside from policy. McCain and Clinton are corrupt establishment characters. Obama is slightly less likely to sell himself to the powers that be. McCain and Clinton did long ago.

 

[angelatc]

I'd rather see a horse be elected to office than those three.

Quoted for truth...and if you think that Obama is less likely to sell himself, I probably need to remind you that he is a product of the Chicago Democratic machine! There are no politicians in Chicago that aren't corrupt. None. Nada. Zip.

 

[Luther]

i'm curious as to why obama

Obama and Clinton hardly differ in their political positions, but Obama got to where he is mostly through his own achievement. Hillary is where she is only because she married Bill. I regret to bring up superficial attributes, but Obama is tall, thin, and handsome, Clinton is short, fat, and old. Fine, call me a sexist. My defense would be that I have a refined sense of aesthetics. Either would be better than McCain because McCain is insane; Clinton or Obama would be restrained in their decision making to a large degree by popular opinion.

 

[Luther]

do you guys think war mongering is worse than socialist-esque policies?

Most definitely yes. State socialism only causes harm to yourself. Imperialism and aggressive war cause harm to others, therefore it is the greater moral evil.

 

[NEPA_Revolution]

I hate McCain. I want to kill someone when I hear Hillary on the news. Process of Elimination

 

[boomer]

Most definitely yes. State socialism only causes harm to yourself. Imperialism and aggressive war cause harm to others, therefore it is the greater moral evil.

agreed

 

[RevolutionSD]

Obama?
Do you guys even know ANYTHING about him?

He voted to fund the war TWICE.

He voted FOR the patriot act.

He will not rule out a NUCLEAR strike on Iran!

There is no difference btw Obama & Hillary. You're voting for the NWO either way.

 

[Austin]

I would least hate to see Obama, but I would never, ever vote for him.

Patriot Act, Iraq War Funding, Real ID Act, Pakistan, CFR, Taxes, etc etc

 

[NEPA_Revolution]

Why do you think Obama uses the Red State thing so much SD

 

[Revolution9]

obama

Skull and Bones finance guy and hooked into the machine that killed family farms. he is for bigtime agricultural welfare for corporations.

HTH
Randy

 

[Luther]

Obama?
Do you guys even know ANYTHING about him?

He voted to fund the war TWICE.

He voted FOR the patriot act.

He will not rule out a NUCLEAR strike on Iran!

There is no difference btw Obama & Hillary. You're voting for the NWO either way.

The question was about who would you least hate to win.

 

[ShowMeLiberty]

Why in the hell are people here actually answering these troll-like questions? You realize that everything you say will be reported directly back to Oprabama HQ, don't you?

 

[boomer]

do you guys ever get the feeling that the 3 are all getting their strings pulled by the same people?

 

[RSLudlum]

Ok if i have to pick which one i'd rather live with it being Prez it would be...Obama. He's quite liberal (probably an understatement) but his inexperience would make him less effective in implementing the policies he proposes therefore having quite a smaller effect on the grand scheme of American life. On the other hand, Hillary has the machinery to get things done. And McDisaster is totally out of the question..i hate even seeing or typing his damn name.