Athan Member Joined Mar 18, 2008 Messages 3,784 Aug 17, 2012 #41 This poll sucks. I voted, but only because THERE WAS NO THIRD CHOICE.
Elwar Member Joined May 14, 2007 Messages 8,226 Aug 17, 2012 #42 roho76 said: I'm actually surprised by those numbers. Click to expand... I agree. 12 people think 8 years of tyranny is better than 4.
roho76 said: I'm actually surprised by those numbers. Click to expand... I agree. 12 people think 8 years of tyranny is better than 4.
anaconda Member Joined Nov 25, 2007 Messages 19,403 Aug 17, 2012 #43 Anti Federalist said: Obama/Biden A Romney "win" would set "our" efforts back decades. Click to expand... A case for just the opposite: http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/05/22/153295435/mitt-romney-vs-rand-paul-in-2016
Anti Federalist said: Obama/Biden A Romney "win" would set "our" efforts back decades. Click to expand... A case for just the opposite: http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/05/22/153295435/mitt-romney-vs-rand-paul-in-2016
Havax Member Joined Jan 25, 2008 Messages 1,441 Aug 17, 2012 #44 Athan said: This poll sucks. I voted, but only because THERE WAS NO THIRD CHOICE. Click to expand... No it doesn't. You're just too lazy or incompetent to read the original post and understand the purpose of the thread.
Athan said: This poll sucks. I voted, but only because THERE WAS NO THIRD CHOICE. Click to expand... No it doesn't. You're just too lazy or incompetent to read the original post and understand the purpose of the thread.