Who Thinks Every Future Money Bomb Should be Centered Against an Opposing Candidate?

Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
12,749
Round 1: The Revolution vs. RomneyCare (Mitt Romney)
Round 2: The Revolution vs. the Federal Reserve (Herman Cain)
Round 3: The Revolution vs. Adultery (Newt Gingrich)
Round 4: The Revolution vs. the Global Warmists (Tim Pawlenty)
Round 5: The Revolution vs. the Ditz (Sarah Palin)

Or whatever works best against each candidate. Or one can be "vs. TARP", which is basically all of them.
 
I don't consider this to be a bad idea but perhaps would leave anyone that ISN'T ALREADY a RP supporter with a bad taste in their mouth. I'd hate for him to be labeled the jerk of the race.

With that said I thought "Revolution vs. Romneycare" was a distasteful idea at first- but seems to be catching more press this way so I've changed my mind.
 
I think Romney is fair game but we want to pick up supporters of others as they drop out, so I don't know. Plus Ron will actually ELEVATE their name recognition (except Gingrich and Palin, and we are MOST likely to pick up some of Palin's if she doesn't run.) I'd say we supporters should take on the lesser lights, for now.

I do agree that an anti-tarp one at somepoint would open the door to supporter made video ads showing ALL the others (whichever are still standing) except Bachmann supporting TARP.
 
Last edited:
Only candidates that are clearly ahead like Mitt Romney. Anyone else would be acknowledging that they actually exist, and that is what you want to avoid. A candidate needs to present the IMAGE to the people that they are a front runner, and it will work wonders. In this case, the RP campaign is saying we are close behind Romney and there is nothing in between.
 
the only reason Romneycare was targeted, is because frankly, it's the only potential competition to the Champions of the Constitution at this given time.
 
Obviously if the money bombs are going to be every month, it should be either an Independence Day Money bomb, or with the Ames Straw Poll around the corner, it should be an Iowa Projects Money Bomb (Link). That gives them an extra push for Ames 30+ days before the event.

They're going to need the money and I'm sure that is going to be the next major focus!
 
Last edited:
The other candidates are phony double talkers that deserve to be exposed. Fox News and the neo-con radio hosts sure aren't telling the truth about them. I don't see it as "attacking", I see it as informing the public about who these people really are.
 
The other candidates are phony double talkers that deserve to be exposed. Fox News and the neo-con radio hosts sure aren't telling the truth about them. I don't see it as "attacking", I see it as informing the public about who these people really are.

I just think that is our place, and perhaps the place of ads if they are like Rand's, not like Conway's. But WE can take the others down. And once Ron is attacked, it would be different.
 
I think we need some time until the next effort. The "Iowa Projects" idea should be the next money bomb focus. Could be a week-long thing.
 
There aren't too many people deciding between Ron Paul and Romney. Romney is not well liked by the tea party conservatives, and people who might be supporting Palin or Bachmann likely appreciate the attacking of Romney.

It also says "Round 1". Ron may trying to position himself as "antiRomney". The Conservative opponent of the Establishment RINO Romney. Many think that it'll boil down in the end to a tea party Conservative vs an establishment RINO.


Only candidates that are clearly ahead like Mitt Romney. Anyone else would be acknowledging that they actually exist, and that is what you want to avoid. A candidate needs to present the IMAGE to the people that they are a front runner, and it will work wonders. In this case, the RP campaign is saying we are close behind Romney and there is nothing in between.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top