Who Killed the Constitution?

Good Author Good Conent

Definitely listening to this one. NVP is cool. Best show on the net. Other try to fake the funk and Hoot slaps them with edge of his pabst.
 
This show is gonna be the bomb

Don't mess with NVP. When they say TWOOD is gonna be on the show and you doubt it, you feel the Pain of Hoots Ninja Turtle Founding Father backhand. NVP is the best show on the Net. They have been practicing thier Sholin style for many many years. When you least expect it Ray comes with his centipede attack while Hoot uses the fury of the Panda.
 
So, it's not "original content" - it's a talk show host

Drsteveparent said:
No it is our original show and Mr. Woods is a host on our network.
Click to expand...

So, it's not an "original content" interview.

It's simply another talk show host who on any given day may talk about something of interest or not, just like all your other regularly scheduled hosts.

Presumably, today's broadcast will be the equivalent of an "infomercial" to increase sales of his book.

Note: Even MSM has e-mail subscriptions that list the topics that will be discussed every day the day *before* the broadcast.

MSM also makes transcripts available, which is much more efficient usage of my minimal discretionary time each day.
 
Sally08 said:
So, it's not an "original content" interview.

It's simply another talk show host who on any given day may talk about something of interest or not, just like all your other regularly scheduled hosts.

Presumably, today's broadcast will be the equivalent of an "infomercial" to increase sales of his book.

Note: Even MSM has e-mail subscriptions that list the topics that will be discussed every day the day *before* the broadcast.

MSM also makes transcripts available, which is much more efficient usage of my minimal discretionary time each day.
Click to expand...

Um, authors go on the radio all the time to talk about their books. For heaven's sake, why do people here go out of their way to find fault?
 
Interview or talk show host?

NightOwl said:
Um, authors go on the radio all the time to talk about their books. For heaven's sake, why do people here go out of their way to find fault?
Click to expand...

The context of my post was whether Revolution Broadcasting was, yet again, "piggybacking" someone else's efforts in broadcasting interviews without giving credit to those who actually were able to schedule such interviews.

It initially appeared that this would be another interview. Hence, the question was raised as to who set up the interview.

Then, it turned out that this is not an "interview" at all, but a new broadcast host who happens to have just published another book.

I consider "interviewing yourself" to be an "infomercial".

And I never listen to informercials-

For some reason, they're always biased-

Then, again, I've never listened to talk radio ever, either.
 
Sally08 said:
So, it's not an "original content" interview.

It's simply another talk show host who on any given day may talk about something of interest or not, just like all your other regularly scheduled hosts.

Presumably, today's broadcast will be the equivalent of an "infomercial" to increase sales of his book.

Note: Even MSM has e-mail subscriptions that list the topics that will be discussed every day the day *before* the broadcast.

MSM also makes transcripts available, which is much more efficient usage of my minimal discretionary time each day.
Click to expand...

I love this comment : MSM also makes transcripts available, which is much more efficient usage of my minimal discretionary time each day.[/QUOTE]

You sure spend hours upon hours hijacking our posts on daily paul LAURIE/SALLY08.

You also failed to read the content in this post : Mr. Woods also has 2 books endorsed by Dr. Ron Paul.

I can see why a Mccain staffer would not like this information out to the people.
 
Sally08 said:
The context of my post was whether Revolution Broadcasting was, yet again, "piggybacking" someone else's efforts in broadcasting interviews without giving credit to those who actually were able to schedule such interviews.

It initially appeared that this would be another interview. Hence, the question was raised as to who set up the interview.

Then, it turned out that this is not an "interview" at all, but a new broadcast host who happens to have just published another book.

I consider "interviewing yourself" to be an "infomercial".

And I never listen to informercials-

For some reason, they're always biased-

Then, again, I've never listened to talk radio ever, either.
Click to expand...

You're not reading carefully. Dr. Woods is going to be a new host, but this isn't his program he's appearing on. So no, he isn't interviewing himself. His new program hasn't even started yet, as far as I can see.
 
Thomas Woods may be a great guy

LibertyEagle said:
Sally98,

Thomas Woods is a good guy. He's well worth listening to.
Click to expand...

But I will *never* listen to him via RevolutionBroadcasting.

I already researched contact information for him to tell him that directly.

I also sent Lew Rockwell the RB advertisements mentioning the Mises affiliation. We had discussions about "Dr. Steve Parent" in the past, so I'm sure that Lew is well aware of the possible erroneous assumption that Thomas Woods is speaking as a "representative of Mises" due to the Mises reference.

The business world absolutely frowns on people who express *personal* opinions/political involvement AND USE THEIR COMPANY NAME.

In this instance, it was "Dr. Steve Parent" et al using the Mises name in such an inappropriate manner. Why am I not surprised?

Do any of the broadcasters wonder how many other potential listeners feel the same way *due to* the very public "reputation" of the avatar "Dr. Steve Parent"?
 
Back to the "original content" question

rayzer said:
Oh, I see. Mr. Woods scheduled to be on the North Virginia Patriots show live tomorrow at about 3:25PM Eastern to the best of my knowledge.
Click to expand...

So, Revolution Broadcasting *is* "piggybacking" the Thomas Woods interview as scheduled by North Virginia Patriots.

It is *not* content originated by Revolution Broadcasting.

That is not how to "brand" a "news station".

Look at Townhall - it has branded its "Townhall" with many contributing columnists *who are known as the contributors*.

For RevolutionBroadcasting, "Dr. Steve Parent" is the only name visible *in his daily, constantly SPAMMED ads on both RPFs and DP about the broadcast content*.

That means that the people who did the *work* are not getting the credit they deserve for their *own* online identities/futures.

Even worse for the RB broadcasters is that the "affiliation" with the name "Dr. Steve Parent" eliminates many people from *ever* considering the opinions of such people to be "credible".

Is the cost/benefit worth it?
 
Sally08 said:
So, Revolution Broadcasting *is* "piggybacking" the Thomas Woods interview as scheduled by North Virginia Patriots.

It is *not* content originated by Revolution Broadcasting.
Click to expand...

Is this true? I thought the interview was actually being conducted by Revol. Broadcasting?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
Our Enemy, The Bureaucracy [2025 Mises Circle @ Phoenix AZ]
Replies
3
Views
108
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
PAF
Debate: Jacob Hornberger vs. Walter Block re: libertarianism and Israel
Replies
7
Views
972
PAF
PAF
PAF
Taking the Constitution Seriously
2
Replies
24
Views
564
PAF
PAF
PAF
David Hume’s Insights Explain America’s Economic Decline
Replies
4
Views
71
Snowball
Snowball
jmdrake
Progressive Medhi Hassan embarasses 20 "far right" Republicans
2
Replies
20
Views
330
unknown
unknown
Back
Top