Who is the biggest threat to the establishment?

[Christopher A. Brown]

He's a great philosopher, but just because I quote him doesn't mean I'm some slavish devotee. I'm not some pure Evolian; he was a monarchist, I am a neo-Heathian, he was a classical feudalist, I am a capitalist, he was a racial mystic, I am a race realist. I disagree with him on many things, as I do everyone. I don't agree with anyone more than 75 or 80 percent of the time, including the thinkers I like most.

A very reasonable and quality position.

A group of revolutionaries made an imperfect Declaration 239 years ago that resulted in an imperfect constitution a few years later.

Would you agree with these implied, mostly defined aspects of their intent?

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

A) Stewart Rhodes- A Yale Law graduate who was a U.S. paratrooper. Founded and is a leader of Oathkeepers which defended Cliven Bundy. Was a part of Ron Paul's campaign staff.

Nope, a noble effort, but there's no way they can stop any determined government from enforcing its policies.

B) Joe Bannister- A former IRS agent who was aquitted for tax evasion because he stated there is no law that makes most Americans liable for income tax.

This issue is a total dead end, a distraction. I'd rate him as counterproductive.

D) Tom Woods- Led State Nullification movement.

If Tom owned FOX news, he'd be my pick. But he doesn't, he only has books and a small radio show. Not enough of a voice.

C) Edward Snowden- Former NSA agent who revealed that NSA was spying on most Americans.

Yup, easily the most threatening to the establishment. It's not even so much about the details of the spying programs, as it is about undermining faith in government in general: ala "if they hid this from us, what else are they hiding?"

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Yup, easily the most threatening to the establishment. It's not even so much about the details of the spying programs, as it is about undermining faith in government in general: ala "if they hid this from us, what else are they hiding?"

He does not threaten really. He's released information that is a threat, but only if we can use it.

Inspiration of fear really is not a use. His release of NSA surveillance facts has only made us afraid. We have to have power to use the information and change what the NSA does. We are clueless on how to find our power, my efforts here to create unity are proving that. However, there is interference, but we don't seem to be able to use his information defining how that works. Duh.

Of course, if fear is all we are capable of, we probably would make the mistake of terming such as a threat, despite the fact that the threat is to government IF we can use the info, which we can't.

Accordingly, we are impotent and only a threat to ourselves with our uselessness. But that is not an instant absolute. Only if we continue to be unable to use the information, is it so.

Here is the most useful information of his info releases. The challenge is, can anyone figure out how to use it?

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

Who can conduct critical thinking and is unafraid to do so?