Who is the biggest threat to the establishment?

[dude58677]

Claiming Rand and Ron Paul is too easy so I brought up these others.

A) Stewart Rhodes- A Yale Law graduate who was a U.S. paratrooper. Founded and is a leader of Oathkeepers which defended Cliven Bundy. Was a part of Ron Paul's campaign staff.

B) Joe Bannister- A former IRS agent who was aquitted for tax evasion because he stated there is no law that makes most Americans liable for income tax.

C) Edward Snowden- Former NSA agent who revealed that NSA was spying on most Americans.

D) Tom Woods- Led State Nullification movement.

 

[CPUd]

 

[Ronin Truth]

"The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are." -- H.L. Mencken

//

 

[anaconda]

This is not hard: Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura, Edward Snowden, Louis Farrakhan, Andrew Napolitano, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie. Rand Paul is a second tier threat by muddling and confusing his message but remains significant due to his bargaining chip in ratings, senatorial membership, media talking points about liberty, and connection to the Ron Paul network.

 

[anaconda]

Bannister would be a threat if he joined forces with others like Sherry Jackson, Larken Rose, and Wesley Snipes. And then if Rand would write an op ed in TIME Magazine about them and how they are heros.

 

[wizardwatson]

Why am I not on this list?

 

[Aspie Minarcho-Capitalist]

For me it has to be Judge Andrew Napolitano, hence there's no doubt that if he runs for president in the forseeable future he will be burlesqued by the mass media in the same precise way that Ron Paul had endured.

 

[wizardwatson]

For me it has to be Judge Andrew Napolitano, hence there's no doubt that if he runs for president in the forseeable future he will be burlesqued by the mass media in the same precise way that Ron Paul had endured.

Gosh darn that evil media!

Better we just sit here and do nothing except complain about the media.

Here, I'll help.

Go back in time and clip this dude's dad's nuts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

The one who has done the most objective damage to the establishment is Snowden, by far.

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

This is not hard: Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura, Edward Snowden, Louis Farrakhan, Andrew Napolitano, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie. Rand Paul is a second tier threat by muddling and confusing his message but remains significant due to his bargaining chip in ratings, senatorial membership, media talking points about liberty, and connection to the Ron Paul network.

Louis Farrakhan is an idiot and an embarrassment to the noble movement of black nationalism.

 

[wizardwatson]

Louis Farrakhan is an idiot and an embarrassment to the noble movement of black nationalism.

I thought Traditionalists were against Nationalism? Julius Evola didn't like nationalism.

Evola was one of a number of right-wing intellectuals who opposed Benito Mussolini's Lateran Accords with the Roman Catholic Church and rejected the Fascist party's nationalism and its focus on mass movement mob politics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola

I thought you said you read about Evola? Are you sure?

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

I thought Traditionalists were against Nationalism? Julius Evola didn't like nationalism.



I thought you said you read about Evola? Are you sure?

Evola said many things that were very insightful, and other things I disagree with, like all philosophers I draw from.

 

[wizardwatson]

Evola said many things that were very insightful, and other things I disagree with, like all philosophers I draw from.

Well, I draw from many as well, and yet the only one I see you quoting is Julius Evola who seems like a bit of a dummy.

But at least I know why they stole the Swastika from those Hindus.

" The term ariya (arya in Sanskrit), which in fact mean "Aryan", recurs throughout the canon. The path of awakening is called Aryan -- ariya magga; the four fundamental truths are Aryan -- ariya saccani; the mode of knowledge is Aryan -- ariya naya; the teaching is called Aryan (particularly that which considers the contingency of the world) and is, in turn, addressed to the Ariya; the doctrine is spoken of as accessible and intelligible, not to the common crowd, but only to the Ariya."

-- The Doctrine of the Awakening: The Attainment of Self-Mastery According to the Earliest Buddhist Texts

You've all been tricked by the God of Abraham. Might want to snap out of it.

For other deliciously boring quotes by Julius Ebola you can find a bunch on this 14 page thread at Stormfront (Nazi party pad):

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t953402/

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

Well, I draw from many as well, and yet the only one I see you quoting is Julius Evola who seems like a bit of a dummy.

But at least I know why they stole the Swastika from those Hindus.



You've all been tricked by the God of Abraham. Might want to snap out of it.

For other deliciously boring quotes by Julius Ebola you can find a bunch on this 14 page thread at Stormfront (Nazi party pad):

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t953402/

He's a great philosopher, but just because I quote him doesn't mean I'm some slavish devotee. I'm not some pure Evolian; he was a monarchist, I am a neo-Heathian, he was a classical feudalist, I am a capitalist, he was a racial mystic, I am a race realist. I disagree with him on many things, as I do everyone. I don't agree with anyone more than 75 or 80 percent of the time, including the thinkers I like most.

 

[wizardwatson]

He's a great philosopher, but just because I quote him doesn't mean I'm some slavish devotee. I'm not some pure Evolian; he was a monarchist, I am a neo-Heathian, he was a classical feudalist, I am a capitalist, he was a racial mystic, I am a race realist. I disagree with him on many things, as I do everyone. I don't agree with anyone more than 75 or 80 percent of the time, including the thinkers I like most.

Hitler was a "Christian" too.

He was a Nazi. Just with more emphasis on the ZI.



Labels don't work on me. I judge a man by the ideas he defends and the positions he takes. You are obsessed with race on this forum. You have in your signature a beloved idol of the Stormfront crowd.

I'm the gatekeeper of this place. As long as I remain here, the Spirit is alive. You cannot remove me. Everyone else left.

I'm still standing, buttercup.



The Lord is coming.

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

He was a Nazi. Just with more emphasis on the ZI.

No he was not. Himmler was keeping tabs on him, because he thought Evola's reactionary monarchism was a threat to the Reich.

I'm the gatekeeper of this place. As long as I remain here, the Spirit is alive. You cannot remove me. Everyone else left.

I'm still standing, buttercup.

Don't ever change, wizzy.

 

[wizardwatson]

No he was not. Himmler was keeping tabs on him, because he thought Evola's reactionary monarchism was a threat to the Reich.

Don't ever change, wizzy.

Soon, it will be my turn to laugh. I will not remain captive for very much longer.



EDIT: Your are so very defensive about his Nazi connections. But what is really telling is how much Nazi history you know in order to refute his Nazi connections. LOL.

Anyway, I know he wasn't in the Nazi party, hence the emphasis on the ZI. Not enough NA for Hitler to trust him.

Sad face.

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

EDIT: Your are so very defensive about his Nazi connections. But what is really telling is how much Nazi history you know in order to refute his Nazi connections. LOL.

Anyway, I know he wasn't in the Nazi party, hence the emphasis on the ZI. Not enough NA for Hitler to trust him.

Sad face.

...You couldn't even read his wiki page...

 

[Ronin Truth]

Why am I not on this list?

Because Tom Woods was chosen to represent Topeka, you missed the meeting.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

The one who has done the most objective damage to the establishment is Snowden, by far.

I would agree. In fact we are not developed, open minded or free enough to even appreciate some of what he exposed.

For example, the training manual of GCHQ that is used by the "five eyes alliance" is not at all understood even while it's procedures are executed on a daily basis right here in this forum before our eyes.

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

And BTW, Greenwald, just for sharing what Snowden released could also be on the list.