Who is John Galt? A Message From Liberty Candidate Art Robinson

donkefant

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
219
Got this from the Art Robinson campaign a couple of hours ago:

In her 1957 novel Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand explored the inherent conflict between the “men of the mind” – those who invent, build, and create the things that permit human beings to rise above the status of mere animal-like hunter gatherers with lives that are brutish and short – and Rudyard Kipling’s “Gods of the Market Place,” those who play upon the weaknesses of human nature to tempt men into a path of subservience to the state that leads to slavery for the men of the mind and for all mankind.

Ayn Rand’s men of the mind are a handful of heroic figures whose genius transforms technology and industry, and their enemies are condensed also to a few figures, epitomized by an allegorical Washington lobbyist – Wesley Mouch.

In Atlas Shrugged, the men of the mind go on strike. One by one they disappear, as cryptic signs appear that ask “Who is John Galt?” Galt, an especially talented man of the mind, is the leader of their revolt. Each man of the mind must decide whether he will continue to work for a world controlled by Wesley Mouch – and thereby provide technology for his enemies – or rebel and join John Galt

When Ayn Rand wrote her novel, the great flywheel of human progress powered by a century of American freedom seemed unstoppable. Yet, the statist chains that would be used to slow that flywheel and enslave Americans had already been forged and were beginning to have a noticeable effect. Rand had surely noticed them.

What would be the source of power to slow that flywheel and enslave the American people? Ayn Rand knew the answer – lobbyist Leslie Mouch and the U.S. Capitol building. The chains were formed by corruption of the U.S. Congress.

We are now 50 years beyond Atlas Shrugged. No longer just an allegorical novel, the dilemma posed for the men of the mind is here, now, in real life. Congress is corrupt; Congress has largely discarded the U.S. Constitution; and the 300,000 laws and regulations that Congress has created in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations are the chains that Congress and the lobbyists have prepared for the men of the mind and for all Americans. What is the response?

Well, the producers are definitely not going on strike. You see, Ayn Rand knew them but could not know what they would do.

They are not just a few heroic figures. They are not just the engineers. They are the machinists, the pipe fitters, the welders, the brick layers, the concrete pourers, the capital allocators, the stock and commodity traders, the electricians, the microelectronics specialists, the scientists, and all of the other productive people who have built and are striving to maintain and extend human progress.

And, they cannot be other than themselves. They cannot stop producing or at least striving to produce. They are the builders – not the destroyers. They cannot strike. Their machines need them, and they need their machines. They can only be what they inherently are.

In all of recorded human history, only one nation has been built for and by the men of the mind – the Constitutional Republic of the United States. And that nation is being destroyed by their enemies.

What will they do? First, they continue to work. Many have moved their efforts abroad, where here and there they find temporary niches of greater freedom, even under totalitarian regimes.

Most have remained in the United States. Some of these – especially those in dynamic new industries such as microelectronics, which have developed so rapidly that statist repression has not yet caught up with them – are still relatively free. Those in older industries – such as medicine and energy – find their best efforts suppressed, but they are still able to make minor progress.

While our current men and women of the mind do understand that their freedom to work is under assault by government, which is now entirely in control of the likes of Wesley Mouch, they have made a mistake. They have tried to hire their own lobbyists and politicians, whom they hope will correct this problem. This has not worked. In Atlas Shrugged, the central hero Hank Rearden makes the same error. He actually hires Wesley Mouch.

There is only one way out of this dilemma. The men of the mind themselves must become the U.S. Congress, restore the Republic, and then keep that Republic secure and functioning. There is precedent for this. During its first 100 years, our Congress was composed mostly of citizen volunteers, who served short terms and then returned to their own work.

A Congress made up almost entirely of career politicians and lawyers who make unprincipled and unconstitutional deals with lobbyists to serve their own self interests has failed our nation. It cannot be relied upon to maintain American liberty and justice.

Our country has done the experiments. When men and women were set free, the result was American exceptionalism and the greatest expansion of prosperity in history. As central governmental power has become ascendant, individual freedom and prosperity have diminished. Freedom works... Slavery does not.

“Over-taxation, over-regulation, over-litigation, and over-indebtedness” are not just political slogans. They are the tools of tyranny

The Robinson family enjoys, more than anything else, working productively. We are people of the mind. We work constantly; we think carefully; we occasionally invent something useful; we are like millions of other productive Americans; and we have little to no interest in politics.

Yet, if our house were on fire, we would fight the fire; if our country were invaded, we would fight the invaders; if one of us were ill, we would fight the disease; and since freedom is imperiled, especially our freedom to produce, we are fighting this oppression.

In 2010 and now 2012, we are doing something that we do not want to do, but we have no choice. Congress must be populated by honest productive Americans. Will we be among them? We don’t know. We do know that, by our efforts, we will set an example. Our Congress must change. It must be populated by the men of the mind

In the Defense of our Constitution,

Art Robinson
 
Could you imagine if we got someone like this in Congress?

It's not so far-fetched as you might think:

In 2010, Art Robinson narrowly lost to longtime liberal Democrat incumbent Peter DeFazio by about 10 points, 54%-44%.

AND the Cook Partisan Voting Index has rated DeFazio's old district as D+2, which means it narrowly leans Democratic.

Having been endorsed by Ron Paul in 2010 AND 2012, he's clearly on our side. He's also been endorsed by Steve Forbes.

DONATE: http://www.artforcongress.com/

He was also recently mentioned in a Human Events article:

Leave it to a scientist to keep trying if one experiment doesn’t work out as planned.

Two years ago, Dr. Art Robinson did something a bit unusual for his background and training. The CalTech and University of California - San Diego graduate and research scientist had seen veteran Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio speak at a town meeting in Oregon's 4th District.

"Listening to him, I couldn’t believe he was my congressman, or that he had been in office since 1986," Robinson recalled, "but we already had a Republican candidate and that was that." But when the likely GOP nominee abandoned the race before the primary, Robinson 68 years old, president and director of a research institute and farm, a widower and father of six decided to become a candidate.

Stumping throughout the seven county districts, speaking "before any group that would have me," fledgling candidate Robinson spoke his mind on issues and did so with passion. He called for abolishing the U.S. Departments of Education and Energy, as well as "cutting the budgets of just about every other government agency and department." He also spoke with passion about making legislation by strictly following the U.S. Constitution, and argued forcefully against the concept of global warming. (Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), arguably the strongest opponent of global warming in Congress, cites the petition of global warming skeptics among scientists drawn up by Robinson a few years earlier as the reason he got started on the issue).

And then things started to happen. More than 6,000 individuals made small-but-substantial donations to Robinson and he raised more than $1.3 million. Different tea party groups throughout the 4th District weighed in for the scientist hopeful and, in Robinson's words, "The crowds got larger and larger and before long, there were 42,000 yard signs up in the district, all out by volunteers."

Robinson's first "experiment" was not a success. He lost, albeit with 43.6 percent of the vote, or the strongest showing against DeFazio (lifetime American Conservative Union Rating: 14.15 percent). But this year, Robinson is back, with a better-funded campaign, the blessing of state and national GOP organizations, and will likely get the ballot lines of the Constitution and Libertarian parties along with that of the Republicans.

"People are losing economic freedom," he says, "and they are finding it hard to compete with more government spending and more programs. My opponent doesn’t see it that way. He's a big government socialist who voted for ObamaCare after saying he wouldn't, and for all but one of the stimulus packages."

Clearly, Art Robinson is a unique type of candidate who, when one experiment doesn't get the intended results, tries another. With help from fellow conservatives, this experiment will succeed with the intended results: Rep. Art Robinson (R-Ore.).
 
Last edited:
Nice right up but the corrupt are not working for there own self interest. They are working for irrational short term pleasures must like a cat burglar. They are short sighted and wish to have money without work, respect without being respectable, love without self worth. and so on and so on.

Atlas shrugged is about how the men of the mind continue to work till the strikers convince them that they are working for their own destruction. so in a way its all falling into place.

There may never be an organized strike but every day people make decisions not to do something because of government red tape and in that perfect moment they are going Galt. Though they may not know the hole philosophical meaning behind the decision.
 
''I have done by plan and intention what had been done throughout history by silent default. there have always been men of intelligence who went on strike, in protest and despair, but they did not know the meaning of their action. the man who retires from public life, to think, but not to share his thoughts-the man who chooses to spend his years in the obscurity of menial employment, keeping to himself the fire of his mind, never giving it form, expression or reality, refusing to bring it into a world he despises-the man who is defeated by revulsion, the man who renounces before he has started, the man who gives up rather then give in, the man who functions at a fraction of his capacity, disarmed by his longing for an ideal he has not foud-they are on strike, on strike against unreason, on strike against your world and your values. but not knowing any values of their own, they abandon the quest to know in the darkness of their hopeless indignation, which is righteous without knowledge of the right, and passionate without knowledge of desire, they concede to you the power of reality and surrender the incentives of their mind- and they perish in bitter futility. as rebels who never learned the object of their rebellion, as lovers who never discovered their love.
"
John Galt


SEE
 
Back
Top